Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01935583

Intervention to Promote Survivor Resilience and Adjustment: Efficacy Evaluation

1. To evaluate the short and longer-term efficacy of a structured outpatient intervention program (The Resilience and Adjustment Intervention, RAI) to improve survivors' resilience. 2. To evaluate the impact of treatment on emotional well-being and postinjury adjustment. 3. To evaluate the impact of the intervention on abilities including problem solving, communication, and stress management. 4. To examine the extent to which treatment benefits are sustained in the longer-term.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Virginia Commonwealth University

Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States

About this study

To design effective resilience interventions, a treatment modality which is effective for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors is needed. Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) researchers have had considerable success in the past several decades developing and evaluating interventions for neurobehavioral, cognitive, and vocational challenges after TBI. Researchers have demonstrated the utility of the curriculum-based (C-B) treatment structure in various settings. Additionally, the efficacy of the C-B structure, independent of postinjury timeframe, allows the flexibility necessary to address the unique consequences of TBI.

The C-B treatment modality offers a promising strategy for the promotion of resilience postinjury. The primary purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of a structured, curriculum-based intervention to promote postinjury resilience and adjustment. Objectives include:

  • to evaluate the short and longer-term efficacy of a structured outpatient intervention program (The Resilience and Adjustment Intervention, RAI) to improve survivors' resilience
  • to evaluate the impact of treatment on emotional well-being and postinjury adjustment
  • to evaluate the impact of the intervention on abilities including problem solving, communication, and stress management
  • to examine the extent to which treatment benefits are sustained in the longer-term

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • mild, moderate, or severe TBI
  • able to understand and provide consent

Exclusion criteria

  • active substance abusers (e.g., intoxicated at arrival to intake)
  • at imminent risk of psychiatric hospitalization
  • in imminent danger of hurting themselves or others

Treatment and study plan

Resilience/Adjustment Counseling

Behavioral

Intervention to promote individual's resilience and adjustment (RAI) - The RAI is a structured approach to helping individuals after brain injury address issues related to resilience and adjustment. The RAI is implemented in seven sessions. Each session is in-person and lasts for 60 minutes.

Primary outcomes

  1. Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 (CD-RISC-10)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to Post-Treatment (5 weeks after Baseline)

    During the past decade, researchers have developed resilience measurement scales, and a recent review suggested that Connor and Davidson have been most successful. The authors first developed a 25 item scale (CD-RISC) reflecting resilience characteristics identified by Kobasa and Rutter. Normative studies including factor analyses indicated that the CD-RISC is reliable, valid, and sensitive to treatment effects. More recently, a 10-item version was developed using exploratory and confirmatory factors analyses. Respondents are presented with a series of descriptors (e.g., "I am able to adapt and change," "Coping with stress can strengthen me") and rate themselves on a 0 - 4 scale ranging from rarely true (0) to true nearly all the time (4). Campbell-Sills and colleagues have characterized the 10-item version, to be used in the present study, as demonstrating excellent psychometric properties, namely reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to Post-Treatment (5 weeks after Baseline)

    The MPAI-4 is comprised of 30 items rated from 0 - 4 with higher scores indicating greater problem severity. Items are subdivided into three subscales reflecting emotional and behavioral self-regulation (Adjustment Index), cognitive and physical abilities (Ability Index), and community integration (Participation Index). T-scores are obtained based on norms derived from a brain injury sample. The present investigation will focus on the former two subscales. Adjustment Index items relate to anxiety, depression, irritability, anger, social interaction, and self-awareness. The Ability Index includes items relating to verbal and nonverbal communication and problem solving ability. Research has provided evidence of good concurrent, construct, and predictive validity as well as satisfactory internal consistency. Sensitivity to treatment-related change has also been substantiated.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Virginia Commonwealth University

Other

Collaborators

  • Department of Health and Human Services

Registry information

Official study title

Intervention to Promote Survivor Resilience and Adjustment: Efficacy Evaluation (a Research Project Within the Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Grant)

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2017
First posted
Sep 5, 2013
Registry last updated
Oct 6, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.