Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02712268

Intervention to Improve Prescribing in Elderly Patients

This study tested the efficacy of an easy-to-use checklist aimed at supporting the therapeutic reasoning of physicians in order to reduce inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy in elderly adults admitted to an internal medicine unit.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Background: Polypharmacy and inappropriate medication prescriptions are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Most interventions proposed to improve appropriate prescribing are time and resource intensive and therefore hardly applicable in daily clinical practice.

Objective: To test the efficacy of an easy-to-use checklist aimed at supporting the therapeutic reasoning of physicians in order to reduce inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy.

Design: single-center, interventional, quasi-experimental before-after study. Patients: Consecutive patients aged ≥65 years, hospitalized in the division of internal medicine of a Swiss secondary-level hospital from September to November 2012 (control group, N=450) and from September to November 2013 (intervention group, N=450).

Intervention: Introduction of a 5-point checklist to be used by all physicians on the internal medicine wards.

Main Measures: The proportion of patients with prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) at discharge, according to Screening tool of older people's prescriptions (STOPP) criteria, and the number of prescribed medications at discharge, before and after the introduction of the checklist. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of polypharmacy (≥ 5 drugs) and hyperpolypharmacy (≥ 10 drugs), and the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing omissions (PPOs) according to START criteria.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Consecutive patients aged ≥65 years,
  • patients hospitalized in the division of internal medicine of a Swiss secondary-level hospital from September to November 2012 (control group, N=450) and from September to November 2013 (intervention group, N=450).

Exclusion criteria

  • none

Treatment and study plan

Checklist

Other

Introduction of a 5-point checklist to be used by all physicians on the internal medicine wards to review and adapt the medications of the patient.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the proportion of patients prescribed potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) at discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    The proportion of patients prescribed PIMs at discharge, according to STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) criteria, before and after the introduction of the checklist.

  2. Change in the number of prescribed medications at discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    Number of prescribed medications at discharge, before and after the introduction of the checklist.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of prescribed drugs at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

  2. Prevalence of polypharmacy at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    concomitant use of more than 5 drugs

  3. Prevalence of hyperpolypharmacy at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    concomitant use of more than 10 drugs

  4. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing omissions (PPO) at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    according to START (Screening Tool of Alert doctors to the Right Treatment) criteria

  5. Number of patients prescribed NSAID at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)

  6. Rate (%) of inappropriate prescriptions of NSAID at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)

  7. Number of patients prescribed proton pump inhibitors at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    proton pump inhibitor (PPI)

  8. Rate (%) of inappropriate prescriptions of proton pump inhibitors at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    proton pump inhibitor (PPI)

  9. Number of patients prescribed systemic corticosteroids at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

  10. Rate (%) of inappropriate prescriptions of systemic corticosteroids at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

  11. Number of patients prescribed metamizole at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

  12. Rate (%) of inappropriate prescriptions of metamizole at admission and discharge

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

  13. In-Hospital mortality rate

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

  14. All-cause re-hospitalization rate

    Time frame: In the 3 months after introduction of the checklist (Sept.-Nov. 2013, intervention group) and in 3 months (Sept.-Nov. 2012) one year before the introduction of the checklist (control group)

    re-hospitalization rate 30 days after discharge

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Intervention to Improve Appropriate Prescribing and Reduce Polypharmacy in Elderly Patients Admitted to an Internal Medicine Unit

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Mar 18, 2016
Registry last updated
Jan 4, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.