Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06631274

Intervention for Victimized Youth

IVY (Intervention for Victimized Youth). Just as ivy plants are strong and can flourish in difficult environments, the goal of IVY will be for targets of peer victimization to thrive academically and socially despite challenging circumstances.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

11 year–14 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The project involves the development of a virtual intervention program for targets of peer victimization. Intervention for Victimized Youth (IVY) will improve upon many limitations of existing interventions described above since it is the first intervention program to specifically address the needs of targets of peer victimization from a trauma perspective. Moreover, it addresses key limitations of CBITS and increases the flexibility of the intervention by using a virtual delivery model. Just as ivy plants are strong and can flourish in difficult environments, the goal of IVY is for victimized youth to thrive academically and socially despite challenging circumstances. IVY uses a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approach to address current distress due to peer victimization and teach strategies for handling any future peer victimization. Common elements of effective CBT-based trauma treatments are psychoeducation, emotion regulation skills, imaginal or in vivo exposure, cognitive processing, and/or problem solving. Several methods are used within sessions to teach the content, including psychoeducation, didactic teaching, modeling, role playing, and guided self-reflection.

The proposed 8-week intervention. The focus of the first 4 sessions will be on teaching skills to help students overcome emotional difficulties associated with being victimized. Weekly topics include: 1) Introduction & Psychoeducation, 2) Emotional Regulation Skill Building and Practice, 3) Identifying & Coping with Difficult Thoughts and Emotions, and 4) Connecting Thoughts, Emotions, and Behaviors. The last 4 sessions are specific to peer victimization issues with a focus on avoiding re-victimization since victimized youth often are victimized repeatedly and report that they defend other victims. Weekly topics include: 5) Options for Protecting Yourself, 6) Social Problem-Solving Skills, 7) Adaptive Thinking, and 8) Future Planning & Celebration. Participants will be taught several options for intervening. A decision-making process for evaluating social situations will be taught. Based on the outcome of that decision-making process, participants will be taught options for responding with the goal of avoiding re-victimized.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • current middle school student in US (defined as grades 6, 7, or 8)
  • experience at least one instance of peer victimization in past month
  • Have elevated or extremely elevated social-emotional distress score, as measured by the BESS (Behavior and Emotional Screening System)

Exclusion criteria

  • not current middle school student
  • not experience victimization in past month
  • no elevated score on BESS

Treatment and study plan

Counseling

Behavioral

The intervention (IVY; Intervention for Victimized Youth) is an 8 week group counseling intervention delivered in a virtual environment.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Social-emotional Distress

    Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline); Visit 8 (8 weeks after baseline at the termination visit)

    The Behavioral and Emotional Screening System is a 30 item measure. For each item, participants decide how often a statement is true for them and respond using a 4-point Likert scale (0=never to 3=always). Personal adjustment is measured by 8 items (possible mean scores ranging from 0 to 3) and internalizing problems is measured by 10 items (possible mean scores ranging from 0 to 3). Mean item scores are computed for personal adjustment and internalizing problems, respectively, at pretest (time 1) and posttest (time 2). For both subscales, higher scores indicate greater difficulties, i.e., worse adjustment and worse internalizing issues.

  2. Change in Knowledge of Self-protection Skills

    Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline); Visit 8 (8 weeks after baseline at the termination visit)

    The Knowledge of Self-Protection Options (KSPO) scale consists of 9 items assessing the degree to which participants have knowledge of how to protect themselves. Participants are asked "If I am being bullied, I know how to..." then rate each item on a 3 point scale ranging from 0 (No), 1 (A little bit), or 2 (Yes). Mean scores were calculated for each participant, which could range from 0 to 2, which higher scores representing greater knowledge of how to protect oneself.

  3. Change in Self-efficacy for Protecting Self

    Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline); Visit 8 (8 weeks after baseline at the termination visit)

    The Self-Efficacy for Protecting Self (SEPS) scale consists of 8 items with the stem of "How do you rate your ability to engage in each action?" Response options range from 1 (I can not do this well at all) to 4 (I can do this very well). Mean scores were calculated for each participant, which could range from 1 to 4, which higher scores representing greater efficacy in protecting oneself.

  4. Change in Knowledge of Coping Skills

    Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline); Visit 8 (8 weeks after baseline at the termination visit)

    Coping skills will be measured using the Brief COPE, which is a 28-item scale that assesses coping strategies. Items are rated on a scale from 1 (I haven't been doing this at all) to 4 (I've been doing this a lot). Avoidance coping is measured by 11 items and approach coping is measured by 12 items. Mean scores were calculated for each participant, which could range from 1 to 4, which higher scores representing greater knowledge of how to protect oneself.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Peer Victimization

    Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline); Visit 8 (8 weeks after baseline at the termination visit)

    The victim subscale of the Bullying Participant Behavior Questionnaire will be used to assess traditional/in-person victimization. The scale consists of 10 items Participants respond ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (7 or more times) in the past 30 days. A mean score was calculated for each participant, which could range from 1 to 5 with higher scores representing more victimization.

  2. Change in Cyber Victimization

    Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline); Visit 8 (8 weeks after baseline at the termination visit)

    The victim subscale of the Cyber Bullying Participant Rating Scales will be used to assess cyber victimization. The scale consists of 11 items. The 6-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 6 = many times a week) requires participants to rate how often they have been a victim. A mean score was calculated for each participant, which could range from 1 to 6 with higher scores representing more cyber victimization.

  3. Change in Traumatic Stress Symptoms

    Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline); Visit 8 (8 weeks after baseline at the termination visit)

    Child PTSD Symptom Screener-Self-Report Version for DSM-5 will be used to assess traumatic stress symptoms. The scale consists of 16 self-report items with item responses ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (6 or more times a week/almost always). A mean score was calculated for each participant, which could range from 0 to 4 with higher scores representing more traumatic stress.

  4. Change in Social Support

    Time frame: Visit 1 (baseline); Visit 8 (8 weeks after baseline at the termination visit)

    The Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale will be used to assess perceptions of social support. Only the peer support scale will be used. It consists of 12 items with response options ranging from 1 (never) to 6 (always). A mean score was calculated for each participant, which could range from 1 to 6 with higher scores representing more social support.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Florida State University

Other

Collaborators

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Registry information

Official study title

IVY: Intervention for Victimized Youth

Acronym: IVY

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.