Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03646448

Intervening in Problematic Internet Use

The present study examines the efficacy of a brief intervention for problematic Internet use based on Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in a sample of students screened proactively in vocational schools in Northern Germany. Participants will be randomized in an intervention and a control group. It is hypothesized that after 12 months, participants of the intervention group fulfill less DSM-5 criteria for Internet use disorders, spend less time in the Internet, and suffer from less negative consequences caused by the problematic Internet use, compared to the control group.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Internet Use Disorders

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Lübeck

Lübeck, Germany

About this study

Problematic Internet use is an increasing problem, especially in younger age groups. A population-based study revealed elevated prevalences in adolescents and young adults. The present study aims to provide an intervention for this vulnerable group to change the problematic Internet use. This is suggested to prevent the development of more severe forms of dependence. Brief interventions using MI and elements of CBT have shown to be an adequate method to change addictive behaviors.

For the recruitment, students of vocational schools in the states of Schleswig-Holstein and Hamburg in Northern Germany are screened proactively in classes. Participants fulfilling at least 21 points on the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) receive a diagnostic telephone interview. If fulfilling at least 2 DSM-5 criteria, participants will be randomly allocated to two conditions: (1) Intervention group with up to three telephone counseling sessions based on MI, (2) Control group receiving a booklet on problematic Internet use. Outcome measures are a reduction of DSM-5 criteria for Internet use disorders, a reduction of time spent on the Internet, and a reduction of negative consequences caused by the problematic Internet use. The efficacy of the intervention will be examined after 6 and 12 months in follow-up interviews.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • CIUS score of 21 and at least 2 DSM-criteria
  • At least 16 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • Current treatment for mental disorders

Treatment and study plan

Motivational Interviewing

Behavioral

Up to three counseling sessions on telephone based on Motivational Interviewing and elements of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Counselings are within 12 weeks after the baseline diagnostic interview and follow the stepped care approach.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of DSM-5 criteria

    Time frame: Assessment of criteria at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow ups

    Criteria for Internet Use Disorders according to the Internet Gaming Disorder in the DSM-5, but for all Internet Applications are assessed with a diagnostic clinical interview based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)

  2. Change of time spent on the Internet

    Time frame: Assessment of time on the Internet at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow ups

    Average time of private Internet use on a weekday and on weekends and maximum use are assessed at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow ups. Change of time is measured by the difference between the follow up assessments and the baseline.

  3. Change of disabilities caused by the problematic Internet use

    Time frame: Assessment of disabilities at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow ups

    World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) 2.0 (Adapted Version for problematic Internet use):

    • 4 items ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (strong impairment)
    • 2 items estimating the days of impairment in the past 12 months (time frame will be adapted to the time frame in the assessment)
    • For change of disabilities, the difference between follow up assessments and baseline will be measured for the single items.

  4. Change of negative consequences caused by the problematic Internet use

    Time frame: Assessment of negative consequences at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow ups

    Negative Consequences-Questionnaire from the Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony:

    • 8 items ranging from 1 (much worse) to 5 (much better)
    • Maximum sum score ranges from 8 to 40
    • The questionnaire is inversely coded, so higher outcomes provide a better outcome
    • For change of negative consequences, the difference between the sum scores in the follow up assessments and baseline will be measured

Secondary outcomes

  1. Readiness to change Internet use

    Time frame: Assessment of readiness to change at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow ups

    Readiness to change is measured with a single item ("How important would it be for you to change your Internet use behavior?") on a 10-point-Likert scale (1=not important at all, 10=very important). A higher value represents a better outcome.

  2. Self-efficacy to change Internet use

    Time frame: Assessment of self-efficacy at baseline and at 6- and 12-month follow ups

    Self-efficacy is measured with a single item ("How confident are you to change your Internet use behavior?") on a 10-point-Likert scale (1=not confident at all, 10=very confident). A higher value represents a better outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Luebeck

Other

Collaborators

  • Federal Ministry of Health, Germany

Registry information

Official study title

Intervening in Problematic Internet Use - Preventive Measures for Risk Groups

Acronym: iPIN

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Aug 24, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 18, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.