Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00063882

Interstitial Brachytherapy With or Without External-Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other sources to damage tumor cells. Interstitial brachytherapy uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Combining interstitial brachytherapy with external-beam radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether interstitial brachytherapy is more effective with or without external-beam radiation therapy in treating prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of interstitial brachytherapy with or without external-beam radiation therapy in treating patients who have prostate cancer.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–120 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Cross Cancer Institute at University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare the 5-year freedom from progression in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with interstitial brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).
  • Compare biochemical (i.e., prostate-specific antigen) failure, biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition, disease-specific survival, local progression, and distant metastases in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare morbidity and quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
  • Determine the feasibility of collecting Medicare data in a large Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) prostate cancer clinical trial for cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis of combined treatment with interstitial brachytherapy and EBRT.
  • Prospectively collect diagnostic biopsy samples from these patients for future biomarker analyses.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease stage (T1c vs T2a or T2b), Gleason score (≤ 6 vs 7), prostate-specific antigen (< 10 ng/mL vs 10-20 ng/mL), and prior neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients undergo external beam radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks. Within 2-4 weeks of radiotherapy, patients undergo interstitial brachytherapy with iodine I 125 or palladium Pd 103 seeds.
  • Arm II: Patients undergo interstitial brachytherapy only, as in arm I. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 4, 12, and 24 months, and then annually for 3 years.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 3-5 weeks, at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months, every 6 months for 4 years, and then annually thereafter.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • T1c-T2b, N0, M0
  • Intermediate-risk disease, as defined by 1 of the following:
  • Gleason score < 7 AND prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 10-20 ng/mL
  • Gleason score 7 AND PSA < 10 ng/mL
  • No evidence of distant metastases
  • Prostate volume ≤ 60 cc by transrectal ultrasonography
  • American Urological Association voiding symptom score no greater than 15 (alpha blockers allowed)

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 18 and over

Performance status

  • Zubrod 0-1

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • Not specified

Hepatic

  • Not specified

Renal

  • Not specified

Other

  • Patients must use effective contraception
  • No other malignancy within the past 5 years except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ at any other site
  • No major medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude study therapy
  • No hip prosthesis

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • No prior chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy

  • Prior neoadjuvant hormonal therapy allowed provided the following are true:
  • Therapy was initiated within 2-6 months of study enrollment
  • Therapy was no more than 6 months in duration
  • Use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (e.g., finasteride) is discontinued before registration
  • No concurrent hormonal therapy

Radiotherapy

  • No prior pelvic radiotherapy

Surgery

  • No prior radical surgery for prostate cancer
  • No prior transurethral resection of the prostate
  • No prior cryosurgery

Other

  • No prior transurethral needle ablation of the prostate
  • No prior transurethral microwave thermotherapy of the prostate

Treatment and study plan

Brachytherapy (100/110)

Radiation

100 Gy Palladium-103 (P-102) or 110 Gy Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds within 2-4 weeks of completion of external beam radiotherapy.

Brachytherapy (125/145)

Radiation

125 Gy Palladium-103 (P-103) or 145 Gy Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds within 4 weeks of study entry.

external beam radiation therapy

Radiation

Total dose of 45 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles as a daily dose of 1.8 Gy given 5 times per week. The prescribed dose is defined at the International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reference point. Both 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are permitted.

Other names: EBRT

Primary outcomes

  1. 5-Year Freedom From Progression Rate

    Time frame: From randomization to 5 years

    A Freedom from Progression (FFP) failure includes biochemical failure, local failure, distant failure, or death due to any cause. Patients who are failure free with less than 5 years of follow-up or who receive any secondary salvage therapy are censored. Freedom from Progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Biochemical Failure Rate (Protocol Definition)

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.

    Biochemical failure is defined as having 3 consecutive rises of post-treatment PSA or starting hormones after one or more elevations in post-treatment PSA but before 3 consecutive elevations are documented. The sum of the 3 consecutive rises must exceed 1 ng/mL above the nadir. If 3 consecutive PSA rises occur during the first 24 months followed by a subsequent non-hormonal induced PSA decrease, patients will not be considered PSA failures. Three consecutive rises with any of the 3 PSA values occurring more than 24 months after the implant procedure will constitute a failure. Time to biochemical is defined as time from randomization to the date of first biochemical failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without biochemical failure (competing risk). Biochemical failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.

  2. Biochemical Failure (Phoenix Definition)

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.

    Biochemical Failure is defined as an increase of 2 ng/ml or more in PSA over the nadir PSA after 24 months from the start of treatment or the start of salvage hormones. Time to biochemical is defined as time from randomization to the date of first biochemical failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without biochemical failure (competing risk). Biochemical failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.

  3. Prostate Cancer Death

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.

    Prostate cancer death is defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of treatment or death associated with any of the following: 1) further clinical tumor progression occurring after initiation of salvage androgen suppression therapy; 2) a rise that exceeds 1.0 ng/ml in the serum PSA level on at least two consecutive occasions that occurs during or after salvage androgen suppression therapy; and 3) disease progression in the absence of any anti-tumor therapy. Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of prostate cancer death, last known follow-up (censored), or death without prostate cancer (competing risk). Prostate cancer death rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.

  4. Local Failure

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.

    Failure is defined as progression (increase in palpable abnormality) at any time, failure of regression of the palpable tumor by two years, and redevelopment of a palpable abnormality after complete disappearance of previous abnormalities. Histologic criteria for local failure are presence of prostatic carcinoma upon biopsy and positive biopsy of the palpably normal prostate more than two years after the start of treatment. Time to local failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first local failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without local failure (competing risk). Local failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.

  5. Distant Metastases

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.

    Failure is defined as the appearance of any distant metastases. Time to distant metastases is defined as time from randomization to the date of first distant metastases, last known follow-up (censored), or death without distant metastases (competing risk). Distant metastases rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.

  6. Overall Survival

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients had been on study for at least 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.

    Failure is defined as death due to any cause. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Five year rates are reported.

  7. Percentage of Patients With Acute Grade 2+ and Grade 3+ Toxicities [Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), and Overall]

    Time frame: Zero to 180 days from the start of radiation

    Acute toxicities are scored according to NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0 and will be defined as the worst severity of the toxicity occurring ≤ 180 days from start of radiation. The CTC v 2.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to based.

  8. Time to Late Grade 3+ Toxicities [Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), and Overall]

    Time frame: From 181 days after the start of radiation to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years.

    Late toxicities are scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme and will be defined as the worst severity of the toxicity occurring > 180 days from radiation start. Grade 3+ GU/GI and overall were analyzed. RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to toxicity. Time to late grade 3+ toxicity is defined as time from randomization to the date of first late grade 3+ toxicity, last known follow-up (censored), or death without late grade 3+ toxicity (competing risk). Late grade 3+ toxicity rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.

  9. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) From Baseline to 4 Months

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation

    The EPIC form is a 50-item, validated tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprises of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal function). The urinary domain summary score can be separated into 2 distinct subscales: urinary incontinence and urinary irritative. Hormonal domain was excluded as concurrent use of hormones was exclusionary and prior neoadjuvant hormone use was low. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better health related quality of life. The change score was calculated as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at 4 months and a positive change reflects an improvement at 4 months.

  10. Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) From Baseline to 24 Months

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation

    The EPIC form is a 50-item, validated tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprises of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal function). The urinary domain summary score can be separated into 2 distinct subscales: urinary incontinence and urinary irritative. Hormonal domain was excluded as concurrent use of hormones was exclusionary and prior neoadjuvant hormone use was low. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better health related quality of life. The change score was calculated as the value at 24 months minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at 24 months and a positive change reflects an improvement at 24 months.

  11. Change in Total American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) Score From Baseline to 4 Months

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation

    The AUA-SI is a validated 7-item measure used to assess urinary symptoms. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms for the individual questions and overall total. Six questions ask about frequency of symptoms over the past month with possible responses: 0= Not at all; 1 = Less than 1 time in 5; 2 = less than half the time, 3 = About half the time, 4 = More than half the time, 5 = Almost always. An additional question asks the number of times one gets up to urinate after going to bed, with response indicating the exact number of times ranging from 0 to 5. The total score is the sum of the questions and ranges from 0 to 35. Change is calculated as follow-up timepoint score - baseline score such that a negative change reflects an improvement at the follow-up timepoint and a positive change reflects a decline at the follow-up timepoint.

  12. Change in Total American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) Score From Baseline to 24 Months

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation

    The AUA-SI is a validated 7-item measure used to assess urinary symptoms. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms for the individual questions and overall total. Six questions ask about frequency of symptoms over the past month with possible responses: 0= Not at all; 1 = Less than 1 time in 5; 2 = less than half the time, 3 = About half the time, 4 = More than half the time, 5 = Almost always. An additional question asks the number of times one gets up to urinate after going to bed, with response indicating the exact number of times ranging from 0 to 5. The total score is the sum of the questions and ranges from 0 to 35. Change is calculated as follow-up timepoint score - baseline score such that a negative change reflects an improvement at the follow-up timepoint and a positive change reflects a decline at the follow-up timepoint.

  13. Change in European Quality of Life-5 Domains (EQ-5D) From Baseline to 4 Months

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation

    The EQ-5D is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 3 problem levels (1-none, 2-moderate, 3-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The change score was calculated as the value at the follow-up timepoint minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at the follow-up timepoint and a positive change reflects an improvement at the follow-up timepoint.

  14. Change in European Quality of Life-5 Domains (EQ-5D) From Baseline to 24 Months

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation

    The EQ5D is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 3 problem levels (1-none, 2-moderate, 3-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The change score was calculated as the value at the follow-up timepoint minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at the follow-up timepoint and a positive change reflects an improvement at the follow-up timepoint.

Other outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Collecting Medicare Data in a Large RTOG Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial for Cost Effectiveness and Cost Utility Analysis of Combined Treatment With Interstitial Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiotherapy

    Time frame: Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.

  2. 5-Year Freedom From Progression Rate by Ethnicity

    Time frame: From randomization to 5 years

    NIH-required analysis. A Freedom from Progression (FFP) failure includes biochemical failure, local failure, distant failure, or death due to any cause. Patients who are failure free with less than 5 years of follow-up or who receive any secondary salvage therapy are censored. Freedom from Progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

  3. 5-Year Freedom From Progression Rate by Race

    Time frame: From randomization to 5 years

    NIH-required analysis. A Freedom from Progression (FFP) failure includes biochemical failure, local failure, distant failure, or death due to any cause. Patients who are failure free with less than 5 years of follow-up or who receive any secondary salvage therapy are censored. Freedom from Progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

Network

Collaborators

  • NRG Oncology
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III Study Comparing Combined External Beam Radiation and Transperineal Interstitial Permanent Brachytherapy With Brachytherapy Alone for Selected Patients With Intermediate Risk Prostatic Carcinoma

Important dates

Study start
2003
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jul 9, 2003
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.