Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Fu Jen Catholic University
New Taipei City, 24352, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT06934031
This study aims to compare the translation and interpretation performance of ChatGPT, Google Translate(GT),and UD Talk in cardiopulmonary consultations and analyze their effectiveness in addressing language barriers.The investigators hypothesize that ChatGPT and UD Talk will outperform GT in terms of accuracy and error rates.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
New Taipei City, 24352, Taiwan
Background: Language barriers in healthcare have a significant impact on patient safety, health outcomes, and the quality of healthcare services. With the increase in global migration, more patients are facing language challenges in foreign healthcare systems. Literature shows that providing professional interpretation services significantly improves patient satisfaction and communication quality. However, due to the high usage of ad-hoc interpreters and the shortage of professional interpreters, clinical communication quality has declined.
Study Design: This is a one-year, single-center, prospective observational study. Methods: The study will be conducted in the cardiology and pulmonology outpatient clinics at Fu Jen University Hospital. A total of 20 cardiopulmonary disease patients will be enrolled, withtheir consultation sessions recorded and transcribed into Chinese. The study will compare the three tools' performance in terms of semantic accuracy, error types, and severity, and analyze their feasibility in clinical practice. Further analysis will involve satisfaction surveys from both professional interpreters and non-native speakers living in Taiwan. The translation results will be evaluated for accuracy and error rates by 8 professional medical interpreters, with a satisfaction survey completed by a total of 14 non-experts. The evaluation tool will be based on the assessment rubrics from the National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters.
Effect: It is expected that ChatGPT and UD Talk will show better translation accuracy and interpretation quality compared to GT. UD Talk is anticipated to perform better than the other two tools in real-time interpretation. The study results will provide valuable insights for future medical interpretation training and clinical applications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
First part
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Second part
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Third part
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
ChatGPT, Google Translate, and UD talk
Time frame: 4 months
6-point Likert scale, with 5 representing the highest score and 0 representing the lowest.
Fu Jen Catholic University
Other
A Comparative Study of Interpretation Performance of ChatGPT, Google Translate, and UD Talk in Chinese and Japanese Medical Consultation Scenarios: Contexts of Cardiopulmonary Disease Consultation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04893447
Adolescent, Adult
Boise, Idaho, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05959993
Defibrillators, Implantable, Outpatients
Izmir, Bornova, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04935541
Behavior, Cataract
Ankara, Sıhhiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04245020
Behavior, General Surgery
Dublin, Co. Dublin, Ireland
View Trial Details