CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus
BehavioralTinnitus e-learning programme
Other names: iCBT
NCT Number: NCT02665975
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention with face to face standard clinical care for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
Objectives Tinnitus is one of the most distressing disabilities and innovative ways of managing the related health care burden is required. A cognitive behavioural therapy (CTB) based internet intervention (iCBT) has been developed to improve access to tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United Kingdom (UK) compared to standard face-to-face clinical care.
Design A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), will be used to evaluate the effectiveness iCBT on tinnitus distress. Participants placed in the experimental group will receive iCBT and those in the control group will undergo standard face-to-face hospital based clinical care.
Setting: This will be an multi-center study, recruiting from three tinnitus clinics in the East of England, UK; namely: Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Trust, Milton Keynes University Hospital and Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust
Participants: Recruitment will be undertaken from 3 separate clinical settings. Adult patients seen by ENT Consultants or Audiologist at these centers who mention being significantly bothered by tinnitus, and who would normally be referred for tinnitus services will be considered for the study. 80 Participants will be recruited and will be randomly assigned to either receiving face-to-face clinical clinical care consisting or or internet-based intervention (iCBT).
Intervention:
i) iCBT group: This group will undergo a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.
ii) Standard clinical care group: receive individual face-to-face tinnitus appointment providing the care deemed most important to this individual and follow-up appointments as required.
Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory- Screening version and self-reported measures for insomnia, hearing disability, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety and depression and quality of life. These will be measured at baseline, 3 months post- intervention and 6-months post- intervention, to assess the intervention effects over time.
Hypothesis: If iCBT proves feasible and is effective compared to standard clinical care, it may have implications for the way tinnitus suffers are managed in the UK. It may be that a subset of tinnitus suffers can be managed though an e-learning treatment program, freeing up services for those with more severe problems that need face to face treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Tinnitus e-learning programme
Other names: iCBT
Hospital tinnitus counselling
Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
A self-reported outcome measure of tinnitus severity. Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score out of 100 is reported and not any subscales Scores below 25 indicate mild tinnitus, from 25-50 indicated significant tinnitus and from 50-100 severe tinnitus
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both time points are reported
Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported
Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome
Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention
Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported
Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported
Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Hotal score used, not sub scales
Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention
Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported
Measure of sleep problems Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales
Anglia Ruskin University
Other
Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus: A Multi-study Randomised Control Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07731230
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Istanbul, Kadikoy, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04661995
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07637708
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Santiago, Chile
View Trial DetailsNCT07631403
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details