Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02665975

Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a CBT-based internet intervention with face to face standard clinical care for adults with tinnitus in the United Kingdom.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Objectives Tinnitus is one of the most distressing disabilities and innovative ways of managing the related health care burden is required. A cognitive behavioural therapy (CTB) based internet intervention (iCBT) has been developed to improve access to tinnitus treatments. This study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the impact associated with tinnitus in the United Kingdom (UK) compared to standard face-to-face clinical care.

Design A two-armed Randomized Control Trial (RCT), will be used to evaluate the effectiveness iCBT on tinnitus distress. Participants placed in the experimental group will receive iCBT and those in the control group will undergo standard face-to-face hospital based clinical care.

Setting: This will be an multi-center study, recruiting from three tinnitus clinics in the East of England, UK; namely: Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Trust, Milton Keynes University Hospital and Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust

Participants: Recruitment will be undertaken from 3 separate clinical settings. Adult patients seen by ENT Consultants or Audiologist at these centers who mention being significantly bothered by tinnitus, and who would normally be referred for tinnitus services will be considered for the study. 80 Participants will be recruited and will be randomly assigned to either receiving face-to-face clinical clinical care consisting or or internet-based intervention (iCBT).

Intervention:

i) iCBT group: This group will undergo a CTB-based internet intervention, providing an opportunity to learn about new ways of coping with tinnitus during everyday life. It is 8 week long e-learning intervention, with new modules introduced weekly and assignments given to practice techniques learnt.

ii) Standard clinical care group: receive individual face-to-face tinnitus appointment providing the care deemed most important to this individual and follow-up appointments as required.

Outcome measures: The main outcome measure is the Tinnitus Functional Index. Secondary outcome measures are the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory- Screening version and self-reported measures for insomnia, hearing disability, cognitive functioning, hyperacusis, anxiety and depression and quality of life. These will be measured at baseline, 3 months post- intervention and 6-months post- intervention, to assess the intervention effects over time.

Hypothesis: If iCBT proves feasible and is effective compared to standard clinical care, it may have implications for the way tinnitus suffers are managed in the UK. It may be that a subset of tinnitus suffers can be managed though an e-learning treatment program, freeing up services for those with more severe problems that need face to face treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Attending either Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Milton Keynes University Hospital or Hinchingbrooke Hospitals as recruitment is via these hospitals
  • The ability to read and type in English
  • No barriers to using a computer (e.g. significant fine motor control or visual problems)
  • Internet and e-mail access, and the ability to use these
  • Commitment to completing the programme
  • Completion of the online screening and outcome questionnaires
  • Agreeing to participate in either group and be randomized to one of these groups
  • Understanding and working towards the end goal of reducing the impact and distress of tinnitus, although the strength of the tinnitus may remain the same

Exclusion criteria

  • Reporting any major medical or psychiatric conditions
  • Reporting pulsatile, objective or unilateral tinnitus, which have not been investigated medically
  • Tinnitus as a consequence of a medical disorder, still under investigation
  • Undergoing any tinnitus therapy concurrently to partaking in this study

Treatment and study plan

CBT-based internet-intervention for tinnitus

Behavioral

Tinnitus e-learning programme

Other names: iCBT

Face-to-face clinical tinnitus care

Behavioral

Hospital tinnitus counselling

Primary outcomes

  1. The Tinnitus Functional Index

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention

    A self-reported outcome measure of tinnitus severity. Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation TFI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score out of 100 is reported and not any subscales Scores below 25 indicate mild tinnitus, from 25-50 indicated significant tinnitus and from 50-100 severe tinnitus

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both time points are reported

    Measure of how severe the tinnitus is Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation THI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales

  2. Satisfaction With Life Scale

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported

    Quality of life measure Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 5 Maximum value 35 Higher score is a better outcome

    Total score used, not sub scales

  3. Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention

    Measure of how cognitive difficulties such as concentration and memory Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 100 Higher score is a worse outcome Units are scores on a scale Total score used, not sub scales

  4. Patient Health Questionnaire

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention

    Measure of signs of depressive disorders Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales

  5. Generalised Anxiety Disorder

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. Both scores are reported

    Measure of anxiety disorder and traits Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 21 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales

  6. Hyperacusis Questionnaire

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported

    Measure of abnormal sound sensitivity Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 42 Hotal score used, not sub scales

  7. Hearing Handicap Inventory

    Time frame: At baseline and at 8 weeks post-intervention

    Measure of hearing difficulties or hearing disability using a screening tool Units of measurement: scores on a scale Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 40 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales

  8. Insomnia Severity Index

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 8 weeks post-intervention. both scores are reported

    Measure of sleep problems Units of measurement: scores on a scale Abbreviation ISI Minimal value: 0 Maximum value 28 Higher score is a worse outcome Total score used, not sub scales

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Anglia Ruskin University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Internet-based Versus Face-to-face Clinical Care for Tinnitus: A Multi-study Randomised Control Trial

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Jan 28, 2016
Registry last updated
Jul 14, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.