Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin
DrugAntibody-conjugated chemotherapy agent.
Other names: Mylotarg
NCT Number: NCT02724163
The main purpose of this study is :
1. To establish which number of doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (up to a maximum of 3 doses) is tolerated and can be safety delivered in combination with cytarabine plus mitoxantrone or liposomal daunorubicin in induction 2. To compare mitoxantrone (anthracenedione) & cytarabine with liposomal daunorubicin (anthracycline) & cytarabine as induction therapy. (Randomisation 1 (R1) closed early to recruitment on 8th September 2017, due to liposomal daunorubicin manufacturing issues resulting in unavailability of the drug.) 3. To compare a single dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin with the optimum tolerated number of doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (identified by the dose-finding study) when combined with induction chemotherapy. 4. To compare two consolidation regimens: high dose cytarabine (HD Ara-C) and fludarabine & cytarabine (FLA) in standard risk patients. 5. To compare the toxicity and effectiveness of two haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) conditioning regimens of different intensity: conventional myeloablative conditioning (MAC) with busulfan/cyclophosphamide and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) with fludarabine/busulfan.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify MeUp to 17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Women and Children's Hospital Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
MyeChild 01 is an international phase III clinical trial in children with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML); a disease with significant mortality. It will compare two induction chemotherapy regimens: mitoxantrone and cytarabine (current standard treatment) with liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine. This will test liposomal daunorubicin, which is believed to be less cardiotoxic than similar conventional drugs, although this is unproven. (Randomisation 1 (R1) closed early to recruitment on 8th September 2017, due to liposomal daunorubicin manufacturing issues resulting in unavailability of the drug.)
Patients responding well to induction chemotherapy are eligible for a randomisation of two consolidation regimens: high dose cytarabine (current standard treatment) or fludarabine and cytarabine (FLA); a regimen commonly used in patients with relapsed disease, testing whether FLA is more effective in front line therapy than standard consolidation treatment. Patients with cytogenetic features associated with a higher risk of relapse and those responding sub-optimally to induction treatment are candidates for haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and are eligible for a randomisation comparing two HSCT conditioning regimens: myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (current UNited Kingdom (UK) standard) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). HSCT has not consistently shown benefit in high risk patients because the mortality associated with the procedure has outweighed the advantage from a reduction in relapse risk. This will test whether reducing the intensity of conditioning improves survival by reducing transplant related deaths without increasing the relapse rate. The trial incorporates a dose finding study for gemtuzumab ozogamicin. The aim is to identify the optimum tolerated number of doses of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (up to a total of 3 doses), which can be safely combined with either of the induction chemotherapy regimens and then to compare this number of doses with one dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin. The intensity of treatment will be directed by cytogenetics/molecular genetics and response assessed by minimal residual disease (MRD) levels measured by flow cytometry and molecular methodology.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
for trial entry
Inclusion criteria
for participation in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin dose finding study:
Centres must be formally activated in order to be take part in the embedded dose escalation study. Please contact the trial office for further information.
Inclusion criteria
for treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin for patients not participating in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin dose finding study or R2.
Inclusion criteria
for participation in R2.(once open to randomisation in the applicable age group)
Patient age:
Inclusion criteria
for participation in R3.
Inclusion criteria
for participation in R4.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
for all randomisations
Antibody-conjugated chemotherapy agent.
Other names: Mylotarg
Anthracycline
(Randomisation 1 (R1)) closed early to recruitment on 8th September 2017, due to liposomal daunorubicin manufacturing issues resulting in unavailability of the drug.
DNA-reactive agent
A water-soluble fluorinated nucleotide analogue of the antiviral agent vidarabine.
Pyrimidine nucleoside analogue, an antineoplastic agent.
Alkylsulfonate
A nitrogen mustard alkylating agent from the oxazaphosphorine group
Time frame: Incidence of DLTs will be evaluated up to day 45 post course 1 and course 2 of induction chemotherapy.
Time frame: Event free survival (EFS) will be evaluated as the time from randomisation one to the first event, up to 16 years.
The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up. EFS estimates will be presented at 24 months along with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Event free survival (EFS) will be evaluated as the time from randomisation two to the first event, up to 16 years..
The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up. EFS estimates will be presented at 24 months along with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Relapse free survival (RFS) will be evaluated as the time of randomisation three to the first relapse or death from any cause, up to 16 years.
The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up. RFS estimates will be presented at 24 months along with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Early treatment related adverse reactions will be evaluated at day 100 post-transplant.
Early treatment related adverse reactions defined as the incidence by day 100 post-transplant of grade 3-5 toxicity for the following systems using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria v4:
Time frame: Relapse free survival (RFS) will be evaluated as the time of randomisation four to the first relapse or death from any cause, up to 16 years.
The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up. RFS estimates will be presented at 12 months along with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Evaluated by day 45 post course 1 and course 2.
Time frame: Evaluated by day 45 post course 1 and course 2.
Response is assessed by morphology confirmed by MRD levels measured by flow cytometry, molecular methods or fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) as defined in the protocol, in combination with platelet and neutrophil counts. These results of these assessments will be combined to determine the patient's disease response using the response criteria defined in the protocol.
Time frame: Evaluated up to one month after the first dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin.
Serum PK parameters will be measured using serial samples taken at multiple timepoints during course 1 and at 1 month post first dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as defined in the protocol by dose cohort.
Time frame: Evaluated up to one month after the first dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin.
Serum PK parameters will be measured using serial samples taken at multiple timepoints during course 1 and at 1 month post first dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as defined in the protocol by dose cohort.
Time frame: Evaluated and presented at the completion of course 1 and 2 of treatment up to a maximum of 45 days post each course of treatment
Evaluated using remission status at completion of course 1 and course 2.
Time frame: Evaluated and presented at the completion of course 1 and 2 of treatment, up to a maximum of 45 days post each course of treatment.
Evaluated as resistant disease, induction death or not evaluable.This will be evaluated at completion of course 1 and 2 of treatment, once patient's blood counts have recovered or reason for non-recovery has been determined.
Time frame: Evaluated as time from randomisation to the relevant question to relapse, up to 16 years.
The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up. CIR estimates will be presented at 24 months along with 95% confidence intervals for randomisations 1, 2 and 3, and at 12 months for randomisation 4.
Time frame: Evaluated as time from randomisation to relevant question to date of death from any cause in patients who have achieved CR, up to 16 years.
The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up. DCR estimates will be presented at 24 months along with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Evaluated as time from randomisation to the relevant question to the first of failure to achieve CR (recorded as an event on day 1), relapse, secondary malignancy or death from any cause, up to 16 years.
The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up. EFS estimates will be presented at 24 months along with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Evaluated as time from randomisation to the relevant question to death from any cause or date last seen for patients who are alive at the end of the trial, up to 16 years.
The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up. OS estimates will be presented at 24 months along with 95% confidence intervals for randomisations 1, 2 and 3, and at 12 months for randomisation 4.
Time frame: Evaluated 30 days after end of trial treatment.
Time frame: Evaluated 30 days after end of trial treatment.
Time frame: Evaluated 30 days after end of trial treatment.
Time frame: Evaluated 30 days after end of trial treatment.
Time frame: Evaluated and presented at completion of course 1 and 2 of treatment, up to a maximum of 45 days post each course of treatment.
Evaluated using MRD result at completion of course 1 and 2 once patient's blood counts have recovered or reason for non-recovery has been determined.
Time frame: Evaluated by day 45 post course 1 and course 2.
Evaluated using the date of haematological recovery (platelets to >=80 x 10^9/L, and neutrophils to >=1.0 x 10^9/L). The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up. Time to haematological recovery estimates will be presented at 45 days post course 1 and course 2 of treatment along with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Evaluated once all patients have completed trial treatment.
Total number of days spent in hospital for each course of treatment, collected from date of randomisation until count recovery after final course of treatment, up to a maximum of 45 days post the final course of treatment. This will be summarised per course of treatment.
Time frame: Evaluated at day 100 post-transplant.
Time frame: Evaluated as time in days between randomisation to R4 and death which is unrelated to the underlying disease and considered related to the transplant procedure.
The primary analysis will be carried out once the last patient has a minimum of 1 year follow up which is estimated to be 7 years after the start of recruitment. TRM estimates will be presented at 12 months along with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Evaluated at 1 year post-transplant and at the end of follow-up, which is estimated to be through to study completion, an average timeframe of 10 years.
The method of assessment will be by scale (Tanner scale) and physiological parameters. This will be evaluated at 1 year post-transplant and at the end of study follow-up.
University of Birmingham
Other
International Randomised Phase III Clinical Trial in Children With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia - Incorporating an Embedded Dose Finding Study for Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With Induction Chemotherapy
Acronym: Myechild01
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04217278
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, Hematologic Diseases
Birmingham, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07723703
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, Hematologic Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT07155226
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia, Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
Decatur, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06928909
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, Hematologic Diseases
Lilongwe, Malawi
View Trial Details