Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Alexandria, Azarita, 00203, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06866860
Background: Patient specific surgical guides (PSG) have been widely used to achieve a precise 3D implant position. However, they prevent external cooling systems from reaching the osteotomy site sufficiently. So, heat generated during guided implant surgery is greater than free hand technique. Adding internal irrigation channel to the conventional surgical guides allows better diffusion of irrigation to the osteotomy site and reduces heat generation.
Aim of the study: Is to introduce a patient specific surgical guide design with internal irrigation system and compare it to the conventional surgical guide with external irrigation clinically through bone temperature, implant stability and radiographically by CBCT through crestal bone loss and bone density.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alexandria, Azarita, 00203, Egypt
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Virtual surgical plan will be completed in the implant planning software (BlueSky plan, BlueSky Bio, USA), and the implant type, position, and sleeve height will be adjusted. Conventional guide will be printed
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Osstell will be used to objectively and non-invasively determine implant stability and to assess the progress of osseointegration without jeopardizing the healing process.
This method is based on determining whether or not an implant is stable enough. The result is presented as an ISQ value of 1-100. The higher the ISQ, the more stable the implant
Time frame: 2nd day, 1 week and 2 weeks
This will be measured as follows:
None (no inflammation). Mild (intraoral swelling confined to the surgical field). Moderate (extraoral swelling in the surgical zone). Severe (extraoral swelling spreading beyond the surgical zone).
Time frame: 4 months
Bone overheating. Bone fenestration. Wound dehiscence. Peri-implantitis.
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
A CBCT was obtained immediately post operatively T1 and after 4 months T2 and evaluated using (BlueSky plan, BlueSky Bio, USA) to asses Crestal bone loss.
Time frame: baseline and 4 months
A CBCT was obtained immediately post operatively T1 and after 4 months T2 and evaluated using (BlueSky plan, BlueSky Bio, USA) to asses Bone density using Hounsfield Unit (HU).
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Other
Evaluation of Internally Irrigated and Externally Irrigated Surgical Guide Design for Placement of Dental Endosseous Implants in Mandibular Posterior Region (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07381608
Alveolar Bone Loss in Mandible, Dental Implant
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05890469
Biomarkers, Dental Implant
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07654452
Dental Implant, Maxillary Tooth Loss
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07665281
Alveolar Bone Loss, Bone Diseases
Hillah, Babylon, Iraq
View Trial Details