Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03020459

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling-reposition to Treat Idiopathic Macular Holes

To compare the morphologic and functional outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling-reposition versus peeling in idiopathic macular holes

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, 200000, China

About this study

This randomized clinical trial will be performed at a single center. Eligible patients with idiopathic macular holes will be equally randomized to internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling-reposition group or ILM peeling group through computer-aided random allocation.

A standard 3-port pars plana vitrectomy was performed by a single surgeon using the Constellation 23 gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, USA).After posterior vitreous detachment was achieved, peeling of the ILM was performed by an end gripping forceps with the assistance of Brilliant Blue G. In ILM peeling-reposition group, the peeled ILM flap is flatten back to peeled area with assistance of perfluoro-n-octane. In ILM peeling group, a round shape with 2.5 to 3.5 disc diameter of ILM is peeled. This is followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange. Patients are encouraged to maintain a face-down position for two weeks postoperatively in two groups.

Postoperative measurements of BCVA and spectral domain optical coherence tomography(SD-OCT) are conducted at 1,3 and 6-month follow-up visits by independent masked observers. Macular light sensitivity and fixation stability are determined with microperimetry at 1,3, and 6 months of follow-up. Mf-ERG, M-score chart and VFQ-25 chart are performed 1,3, and 6 months of follow-up.

Comparison of BCVA, anatomical closure were primarily performed between the two groups. Then, the morphologic changes of inner retina and the functional parameters measured from microperimetry, Mf-ERG, M-score chart, VFQ-25 chart were analyzed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patients are diagnosed as macular hole by optical coherence tomography.
  • Age ranges from 50 to 80 years.
  • The patients have indication for surgery.

Exclusion criteria

  • Traumatic macular hole.
  • Combined with serious epiretinal membrane.
  • Combined with diabetic retinopathy, hypertensive retinopathy.
  • Combined with other ocular diseases, such as keratitis,uveitis,retinal vasculitis.
  • - 6.0 diopters or more of spherical equivalent, 26mm or more of axial length.
  • History of intraocular surgery.
  • Presence of staphyloma.
  • Other ocular diseases that could influence macular microstructure or visual function

Exit criteria:

  • For reposition group, the patients will exit the research if the peeled ILM cannot reposition successfully.
  • Due to adverse events, especially severe adverse events, the researchers consider withdrawal of patients based on concerns of safety and ethics;
  • Drop out;
  • The patients voluntarily withdraw the informed consent;
  • Serious violation of the study protocol due to the subjects or investigators' reasons;
  • Other reasons that the researchers believe for quitting the study.

Treatment and study plan

peeling-reposition

Procedure

After dying with Brilliant Blue G (BBG, Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany), a horizontal ILM strip is peeled off in inferior quadrant of macular area. Then the ILM was peeled from inferior to superior area continuously. The" ILM roll " was unfolded with assistance of perfluoro-n-octane (PFO). Finally, the position of the fixed ILM flap is adjusted under PFO bubble using flute needle or forceps.This was followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange using 14% perfluoropropane gas.Patients are introduced to maintain facedown position for two weeks postoperatively.

peeling

Procedure

After dying with Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany), a horizontal ILM strip is peeled off in inferior quadrant of macular area. Then, the strand of ILM was peeled off radially from the foveal center to vascular arcade. In result, a round -shaped with 2.5-3.5 disc diameter ILM -peeled area was created.This was followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange using 14% perfluoropropane gas. Patients are encourage to maintain facedown position for two weeks postoperatively.

Brilliant Blue G

Drug

We intravitreal injected 0.1ml of Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) to dye ILM before ILM peeling.

Other names: BBG

postoperative posture

Other

Patients of both two groups need to keep prone position for two weeks after the operation.

Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system

Device

All surgical procedures are operated on the Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX).

Primary outcomes

  1. Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)

    Time frame: Pre-operation and 6 months after operation

    Change from baseline BCVA at 6 months after operation, examined with snellen chart.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Close rate of macular holes

    Time frame: 1 month after operation

    Observed from optical coherence tomography

Other outcomes

  1. Morphologic changes of inner retina

    Time frame: 1,3,6 months after operation

    Dimpling observed from optical coherence tomography

  2. Central retinal thickness change

    Time frame: Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation

    Measured by software in optical coherence tomography

  3. Mean foveal light sensitivity change

    Time frame: Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation

    Measured by microperimetry

  4. Fixation stability change

    Time frame: Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation

    Measured by microperimetry

  5. Multifocal electroretinogram(Mf-ERG) change

    Time frame: pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation

    An objective measurement of retinal functions

  6. M-chart score change

    Time frame: Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation

    M-horizontal score and M-vertical score

  7. Visual function questionnaire-25(VFQ-25) score change

    Time frame: Pre-operation and 1,3,6 months after operation

    A questionnaire consisted of 25 visual function questions concerning life quality

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling-reposition Versus Peeling in Idiopathic Macular Holes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jan 13, 2017
Registry last updated
May 13, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.