University of Applied Sciences, Study Course Ophthalmic Optics
Aalen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 73430, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04059289
To compare (low contrast) visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) - both at intermediate distances under nighttime driving conditions in a driving simulator between patients with bilateral EYHANCE IOLs OR bilateral conventional monofocal IOLs. Visual function testing in the driving simulator will be assessed without AND with (static) glare.
Additionally: Assessment of individual response times, scanpath characteristics, evaluation of test retest reliability and self-evaluation of (intermediate) vision and visual impairment related to glare.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Aalen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 73430, Germany
To compare (low contrast) visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) - both at intermediate distances under nighttime driving conditions in a driving simulator between patients with bilateral EYHANCE IOLs OR bilateral conventional monofocal IOLs. Visual function testing in the driving simulator will be assessed without AND with (static) glare.
Additionally: Assessment of individual response times, scanpath characteristics, evaluation of test retest reliability and self-evaluation of (intermediate) vision and visual impairment related to glare.
Simulator
Patients are instructed to drive with a constant speed of 40 km/h on a virtual parcours (straight lane). For testing of either (low contrast) visual acuity or contrast sensitivity, 8-position LANDOLT C's are presented at three locations (within the simulator car, AUDI A4, Ingolstadt/FRG):
(i) At the center of the instrument panel (distance 0.xx m) (ii) At the center of the navigation monitor (y.yy m) (iii) At the center of the rear monitor (z.zz m) A high resolution acoustic attention guidance for immediate gaze direction of the patients towards the three above-mentioned visual stimulus locations (i-iii) is mandatory.
Patients responses are recorded and response times can be extracted from the recordings.
Clinical ophthalmological-optical examinations
SHAPIRO WILK test (statistical testing for proving/disproving normal distribution) Descriptive statistics (either MEAN, standard deviation, in case of normally distributed data - else, MEDIAN, inter-quartile range (IQR).
Assessment of test/retest reliability: BLAND ALTMAN plots, limits of agreement (LOA) Between-group comparison: t-test (unpaired samples), in case of normally distributed data - else, WILCOXON signed-rank test
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This is NOT an interventional study; the intervention (surgical procedure) has been performed PRIOR to the inclusion in this study
Other names: Tecnis EYHANCE IOL (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick/USA), Clareon IOL (Alcon Pharma. Freiburg/FRG)
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
logarithm of visual acuity at preset low contrast level of 1:2.7 (logCS = 0.2)
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
logarithm of contrast sensitivity at a preset visual acuity level of 0.1 (= 2/20)
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
as operationalized by LOA (limits of agreement)
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
time interval between onset of stimulus presentation amd final response
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
fixation duration
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
fixation stability
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
annotation to regions of interest (ROIs)
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
saccade amplitude
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
Distant vision (self-eval., vis. analogue scales: 0 = unsatisfactory ... 10 = optimal)
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
Intermed. vision (self-eval., vis. analog. scales: 0 = unsatisfactory ... 10 = optimal)
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
Mesopic vision (self-eval., vis. analog. scales: 0 = unsatisfactory ... 10 = optimal)
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
Glare sensitivity (self-eval., vis. analog. scales: 0 = unsatisfactory ... 10 = optimal)
Time frame: at least two months after uneventful intraocular lens implantation
Post-op vision (self-eval., vis. analog. scales: 0 = unsatisfactory ... 10 = optimal)
Aalen University
Other
Intermediate Vision in a Driving Simulator Environment: Comparison of the New J&J EYHANCE IOL With a Conventional Monofocal IOL
Acronym: JJ-EYHANCE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05431868
Behavior, Cataract
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05827133
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05392998
Astigmatism, Eye Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05430295
Lenses, Intraocular
Giza, Egypt
View Trial Details