Centro Intergeneracional de Referencia de Macrosad
Albolote, Granada, 18220, Spain
NCT Number: NCT06996418
The goal of this study is to find out whether having children and older people who attend an intergenerational center eating lunch together on a regular basis may be an improvement over continuing to eat lunch with their generational peers in separate dining rooms at the center.
Specifically, the study analyzes the functioning and potential impact of an intergenerational dining room in terms of healthy eating, nutrition, self-evaluation of health and well-being, relational care, nutritional knowledge, and intergenerational attitudes. For this purpose, it sets up, in an intergenerational center, a dining room attended by children aged 2-3 years and older people aged 75 years and older who had previously been taking their lunch in separate dining rooms at the center.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* Does eating lunch at the intergenerational dining room improve the intake of healthy foods by children and older people compared to eating at their usual separate dining rooms with their peers? * Does this type of intergenerational dining room serve as a space for nutritional education of children and older people? * Does the experience of eating together have a positive influence in terms of children's attitudes towards older people and vice versa?
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
2 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Albolote, Granada, 18220, Spain
The term Intergenerational Dining Room (IGD) refers to the intentional and planned space that enables people from different generations to periodically share the experience of eating together in settings dedicated to delivering care and development services (e.g. residential centers, schools), community work, intergenerational practices, etc.
The conceptual framework behind IGD has been articulated through combining the following three key components:
However, despite the growing interest in these components, empirical evidence remains limited, especially for structured intergenerational mealtime interventions with rigorous evaluation of their impact. Hence the goal of this interventional study: to analyze and explain, for the case of a specific institutional context - lunchtime at an intentional shared site's intergenerational dining room - not only the type of food and nutrition patterns but also some of the processes, causal mechanisms, and impacts associated with the social act of eating lunch together as a routine intergenerational practice.
Participant population is integrated by toddlers (ages 2-3) and older people (ages 79 and above) who attend regularly a co-located Preschool and Adult Day Care Center at an intergenerational shared site.
Apart from the 3 main questions presented in the brief summary, the study shall pay attention to further questions as the following:
Researchers will compare a group of toddlers and older adults having lunch together several days per week to a similar group eating lunch just with their peers to see if intergenerational mealtimes make any difference. It is expected that the total number of intergenerational meals over the 16 intervention weeks amounts to 60.
Design of this study corresponds to a randomized wait-listed controlled trial including two wait-listed intervention groups (due to limitation of space to accommodate more than 10 people at the intergenerational dining room) and one control group.
Participants in the intervention will:
Both the control and intervention groups will undergo a final follow-up period of around two weeks to determine the duration of the observed impacts.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
(older people):
Inclusion criteria
(toddlers):
Exclusion criteria
(older adults):
Exclusion criteria
(toddlers):
Intergenerational lunchtime at an intentional intergenerational dining room 4 days a week for 8 weeks. Once this period is over, this group will move on to a follow-up phase that will last for another 8 weeks, during which they will eat 5 days a week in different dining rooms with their generational peers, as they had been doing up to the time of the intervention. Finally, they will undergo a last follow-up period of about 2 weeks.
Waiting period consisting of 8 weeks (while Intervention Group #1 is using the intergenerational dining room). During this period toddlers and older people will eat lunch 5 days a week with their generational peers in separate dining rooms as they have been doing before the intervention. They will then move to eating together lunch 4 days a week for 8 weeks in the intergenerational dining room. Once this period is over they will enter a final follow-up phase for about 2 weeks during which they will go back to eat in generationally separate dining rooms.
Time frame: Day-by-day change in leftovers from baseline to final follow-up (18 weeks)
Application of the Comstock method for the assessment of leftovers through photographing each dish after ingestion and calculating the proportion of waste (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, & 100%).
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 18 weeks
Ad hoc test for assessing nutritional knowledge (identification and classification of foods, and discrimination between frequently and sporadically consumed foods) using the Nutriplato®. A set of five nutritional education activities is used to test nutritional knowledge among older adults (as toddlers' tutors) and toddlers. The number of successes and failures in each activity is assessed at different times throughout the intervention period.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 18 weeks
A Visual Analog Scale (Young Children's Views of Older People) with original illustrations depicting images of older people according to a set of 11 bipolar pairs of adjectives (e.g., slow-fast, dull-exciting) will be presented to toddlers for them to locate their current attitudes towards older people. For each pair of adjectives ranging from -25 (extremely negative) to +25 (extremely positive) a mean global score will be calculated. Higher scores will indicate more positive attitudes towards older people.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 18 weeks
Semantic differential with 9 pairs of bipolar adjectives with Likert-type responses (4 options). For each pair of adjectives ranging from -4 (extremely negative) to +4 (extremely positive) a mean global score will be calculated. Higher scores will indicate more positive attitudes towards toddlers.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks and 18 weeks
Intergenerational Exchanges Attitude Scale , including 13 statements in two subscales ("Attributes to children" and "Relationships between older adults and children" subscales), each rated by older people along a 4-point Likert scale. This format allocates points from 4 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). Higher scores indicate a more positive attitude in relation to intergenerational exchanges.
Time frame: Daily from week 4 to week 16
Due to the young age of toddlers participating in the study, and based on a validated protocol, a member of the team will record observations and feedback on toddlers' reactions, facial expressions, and comments about foods at the moment of consumption. This additional measure will help to better contextualize and interpret results from the Comstock method (see primary outcome measure 'Intake of healthy foods by children and older people').
Time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks
Three components [Social Interactions, Mealtime Relational-Care Checklist, and Mealtime Clean-up] from the Mealtime Scan+ instrument, a reliable tool, will lead to assess both the social environment of the dining room and how relationship-centred were meals being observed. An overall quality of dining environment rating on a 1-8 scale will be calculated too.
Time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 16 weeks
The WHO-5 Well-being Inde is a self-report instrument measuring mental well-being. It consists of 5 statements rated on a 4-point scale. The higher the score, the greater the well-being. A score below 8 indicates low well-being.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
Prosocial Behavior subscale from the "Measure of Early Childhood Empathy" completed by toddlers' parents and teacher. It consists of 9 statements rated on a 4-point scale. The higher the score, the greater the prosocial behavior.
Time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, & 16 weeks
Ad hoc semi-structured qualitative interviews to older adults covering themes such as relationality, care and feeding experience; attention and knowledge about feeding; physical and emotional well-being; generational intelligence and views on toddlers.
Time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks
Adapted and validated version of the Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale for older people. It consists of 5 statements in which older people self-rate along a 4-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate higher self-esteem.
Time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks
EQ-5D's visual analogue scale records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 0-100 scale whose endpoints are 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'.
Time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, & 16 weeks
Ad hoc dialogue-based qualitative interviews to toddlers in the intervention groups exploring feeding experience, physical and emotional well-being and views on older people.
Universidad de Granada
Other
Experimental Evaluation of Intergenerational Mealtime at a Shared Site: A Randomized Wait-listed Controlled Trial
Acronym: IGM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05473312
Behavior, Child Malnutrition
Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06310603
Healthy Nutrition
Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06430138
Healthy Nutrition
Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06665958
Healthy Nutrition
Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, United Kingdom
View Trial Details