Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05843136

Interferential Current Treatment Reduces Low Back Pain and Improves Functionality in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

. 24 individuals were evaluated, with low back pain for more than 12 weeks and aged between 12 and 65 years. The current used in the lumbar region of the participants was of the tetrapolar interferential type and the stimulation mode was the automatic vector, carrier of 4,000 HZ, modulation frequency (AMF) of 50 HZ, sweep frequency of SWEEP of 20HZ. The assessment of pain and functionality was performed using the data collection instrument, the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Owestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) respectively. The present study demonstrates that treatment with interferential current promotes chemical improvement in participants, which opens up new perspectives on the use of this therapeutic approach.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Luiz Paulo Sobral Pereia

Santarém, Pará, 680005150, Brazil

About this study

Low back pain is characterized by pain and represents a change in health that affects mainly adults, although electrostimulation represents an important tool in the treatment of patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, the clinical efficacy of the interferential current used in physiotherapy still lacks reinforcement for clinical validation. In this way, the present study evaluated whether the use of interferential current contributes to reducing chronic low back pain and analyzed whether the electrotherapeutic protocol can benefit the physical functionality of patients with chronic low back pain. 24 individuals were evaluated, with low back pain for more than 12 weeks and aged between 12 and 65 years. The current used in the lumbar region of the participants was of the tetrapolar interferential type and the stimulation mode was the automatic vector, carrier of 4,000 HZ, modulation frequency (AMF) of 50 HZ, sweep frequency of SWEEP of 20HZ. The assessment of pain and functionality was performed using the data collection instrument, the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Owestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) respectively. Data analysis was performed using the JAMOVI 2.2.5 software. Our data showed that individuals with interferential current showed significant improvement in pain relief, as well as in the functional pattern of pain improvement. The present study demonstrates that treatment with interferential current promotes chemical improvement in participants, which opens up new perspectives on the use of this therapeutic approach.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals of both genders
  • Aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Voluntarily sought the Clinic's physiotherapy service
  • Low back pain for more than 12 weeks
  • Medical request and diagnosis of low back pain with or without pain radiating to the lower limbs
  • Immunization against COVID 19.
  • Signature of the free detailed term clarified. (FDTC)

Exclusion criteria

  • Physiotherapy treatment carried out in a period equal to or less than 8 weeks before starting the research
  • Reporting any contraindications inherent to the use of electrotherapy
  • Participants with fractures or spinal surgery
  • Involved in a legal medical dispute
  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
  • Patients with flu-like symptoms during the research period
  • Participants who have more than 2 (two) absences will be excluded from the research.

Treatment and study plan

Physiotherapy Treatment

Other

this is an interventional study of the use of 3 physiotherapy treatment techniques in order to evaluate the effectiveness of interferential current in relieving chronic low back pain

Primary outcomes

  1. Isolated comparative evaluation method, before and after, in the three arms with Application of Rolland Morris Questionnaires

    Time frame: 12 months

    Application of Rolland Morris Questionnaires before and after intervention, this questionnaires assesses mild and moderate pain and disability

  2. Isolated comparative evaluation method, before and after, in the three arms, Application of Owestry Questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 months

    Application of Owestry Questionnaire before and after intervention, this questionnaires evaluates more severe disabilities

  3. Isolated comparative evaluation method, before and after, in the three arms, Application analogue visual score for pain

    Time frame: 12 months

    Application analogue visual score for pain before and after intervention, evaluates the level of pain according to the patient's reference

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal do Oeste do Para

Other

Collaborators

  • Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas FAPESPA

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
May 6, 2023
Registry last updated
May 6, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.