Ege University School of Medicine Hospital
Izmir, Bornova, 35030, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT03542981
Interferential current is widely used as a popular treatment in painful musculoskeletal disorders. And total knee arthroplasty patients present with extreme pain immediately after surgery. So this study is aimed to investigate the effectiveness of interferential current implementation following total knee arthroplasty surgery. In this study interferential current compared with sham interferential current . Patients were assessed with pain, range of motion , edema and the amount of used paracetamol.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Izmir, Bornova, 35030, Turkey (Türkiye)
A total of 132 patients ranging in 60-85 years who were undergoing their first total knee arthroplasty due to knee OA were recruited into a randomized, double-blind, prospective and controlled study. Participants were recruited at the Orthopedics and Traumatology inpatient clinic. The patients were seen postoperative first day and were assigned to receive either interferential current or sham interferential current by block randomization. After the procedure was explained to each subject, interferential current treatment was applied 2 times for 5 days, each treatment was continued approximately 30 minutes. Four electrodes were used to deliver quadripolar interferential current Subjects were told that in order to produce an effect, the intensity of the stimulator must be maintained at a "strong but comfortable level" at all times. The sham interferential current treatment consisted of the placement of the same pads for the same time but no electrical stimulation was applied to the probes. At the same time, all patients received standard postoperatively rehabilitation program. Patients were assessed with pain, range of motion , edema and the amount of used paracetamol.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
•Patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty surgery
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Change in pain measured 5th and 30th days after surgery
Pain intensity that was measured by visual analog scale (minimum score:0; maximum score:100)(higher values represent worse outcome)
Time frame: Change of Range of Motion measured 5th and 30th days after surgery
The measurement of the range of the motion was performed by a goniometer of active extension and flexion (higher values represent better outcome)
Time frame: Change of Edema measured 5th and 30th days after surgery
Edema as a change in circumference from the preoperative value was measured by a meter (higher values represent worse outcome)
Time frame: 5th and 30th days after surgery
the paracetamol intake was recorded as gr. (higher values represent worse outcome)
Ege University
Other
Is Interferential Current Effective in the Management of Pain, Range of Motion, Edema Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery?: Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05541666
Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders
Erzurum, Yakutiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04341948
Musculoskeletal Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05393414
Hispanics, Multimodal Analgesia
San Juan, Puerto Rico
View Trial DetailsNCT05324995
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Isfahan, Iran
View Trial Details