Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03401060

Interest of Denosumab Treatment in Osteoporosis Associated to Systemic Mastocytosis

The study is looking at the efficacy of subcutaneously administrated denosumab 60 mg every 6 months versus placebo after 3 years, by analyze of lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in systemic mastocytosis.

Investigators hypothesize that use of denosumab subcutaneously in patients with osteoporosis related to systemic mastocytosis is effective and safe to improve bone mineral density and prevent new bone events, based on targeted specific RANKL secretion by mast cells and short half-life of denosumab.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Jean Minjoz Hospital, Dermatology department, Besançon, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) represents a heterogenous group of disease characterized by abnormal proliferation of mast cells caused by activating mutations in c-Kit receptor; a tyrosine kinase family receptor present in mast cell that control cell proliferation. Prevalence of SM is estimated to 1/20 000 person. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (Johnson et al, 2009), SM can be separated into two different groups : indolent SM and aggressive SM.

Aggressive SM are defined by a poor prognostic disease either because of an important mast cell tumor mass as sarcoma mastocytosis or mast cell leukemia, or due to an association with an other myeloid hemopathy as myelodysplasic/myeloproliferative syndrome.

Indolent SM are the most common cases with a very good prognostic similar to general population. Symptoms related to mast cell proliferation in indolent SM are very various (Theoharides et al., 2015) and could be divided into 2 entities : those related to mast cell proliferation in tissue as the urticaria pigmentosa and those related to the mast cell degranulation.

There are many clinical relevant mediators released by mast cells after activation that could have putative effects on different systems as cardiovascular, cutaneous, neurologic, digestive, systemic, respiratory and musculoskeletal (Frenzel et al., 2013). Tryptase, histamine, prostaglandin, interleukine-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α are the most common and ubiquitous mediators released by mast cells but there are also some specific mediator targeting an organ as RANKL ; expression of RANKL by mast cells directly control regulation of osteoclast activity and is involved in osteoporosis associated to SM (Rabenhorst et al., 2013).

In systemic mastocytoses, bone lesions are found in about half of patients. A third have osteoporosis defined as a lumbar spine or hip bone T score of -2,5 Standard Deviation (SD) or less. In most cases, osteoporosis was complicated at least by one vertebral fracture with pain and functional disorders (Barete et al, 2010). The median time to fragility fracture after mastocytoses diagnosis is up to 5 years, even in very young population usually considering as low risk of fracture in non mastocytoses associated osteoporosis (Van de Veer et al., 2014)

By default, these patients are generally treated with bisphosphonate per os or intravenously with some efficiency on bone mineral density gain and bone turnover marker decrease (Rossini et al, 2014). However, no study with bisphosphonate in SM has showed durable prevention of new bone events and there are no randomized studies that proved their efficacy in systemic mastocytosis. Moreover, these drugs are not well tolerated in SM wether per os due to worsening of digestive symptoms by mast cells activation, or intravenously with an important number of acute phase characterized by some systemic symptoms as fever ; really experiences with intravenous biphosphonate but very increased in SM. Additional, the use of a bisphosphonate ask the question of the residual long-term effect of this drug that may be several years or even decades with a significant risk of atypical fracture secondary to a adynamic bone remodeling (Edwards et al. , 2013) and the long-term presence of crystals of bisphosphonate in the skeleton, particularly worrying in women of childbearing age. In postmenopausal osteoporosis, importance of residual long-term effect is weighted with advanced median age of patient. The fact that mostly patients with a systemic mastocytosis are young people led to restrict the use of bisphosphonate due to those effects.

Among different treatment available in post menopausal osteoporosis, the use of an anti-RANKL antibody, denosumab, in SM associated osteoporosis could be interesting. First, denosumab has already shown significant efficacy in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women (Cummings et al , 2009). Second, this treatment is proposed every 6 months by a subcutaneous injection with very few side effects and half-life drug is shorter than biphosphonate with probably low residual long-time effect. Third, as mast cells expressed mainly RANKL with a direct role on bone turnover in SM. The use of a specific drug seems to be obvious and attractive.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female >/= 18 years of age at time of informed consent
  • Willingness and ability to sign informed consent, comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures.
  • Patient with Indolent systemic or cutaneous mastocytosis according to WHO criteria (Appendix 4) with any specific treatment including corticosteroid, chemotherapy and immunomodulating drugs.
  • Patient with:
  • osteoporosis defined as bone mineral density T score ≤ -2.5 at the lumbar spine, OR
  • osteopenia defined as BMD T-score >-2,5 and ≤ -1 at the lumbar spine and low energy fracture (defined as fractures that are associated with decreased bone mineral density. Are excluded fractures of skull, face, mandible, metacarpals, fingers, or toes, pathologic fracture, and fracture that are associated with severe trauma).

(in case of osteoarthritis at the lumbar spine, the T score at left femoral neck or total left hip can be used to define osteoporosis or osteopenia)

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient with aggressive mastocytosis or/and Associated Hematologic Non-Mastocytosis Disease (AHNMD)
  • Patient with conditions that influence bone metabolism (primitive hyperparathyroidism, hyperaldosteronism, hypercorticism, etc …)
  • Patient treated with intravenous bisphosphonate within 1 year prior to enrolment or with any other antiosteoporotic treatment within 3 months before enrolment. (per os bisphosphonate, strontium ranelate) Calcium and vitamin supplementation will be accepted
  • Patient previously treated with denosumab
  • Patient with hypocalcemia and/or hypo25-hydroxyvitamin D level non substituted prior enrolment
  • Woman without contraceptive treatment if of childbearing age.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient with contraindication to denosumab
  • Patient with medical, psychiatric or other conditions that may interfere with patient safety
  • Patient with dental problem that need any dental surgery within 6 months after enrolment.
  • Patient with clearance of creatinine less than 30 mL/min/1,73m2 (MDRD) or patient receiving dialysis

Treatment and study plan

Denosumab

Drug

Each subcutaneous injection will occur every 6 months during 3 years for a total of 7 injections

Other names: XGeva®

Placebo

Drug

Each subcutaneous injection will occur every 6 months during 3 years for a total of 7 injections

Primary outcomes

  1. Analysis of the lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD)

    Time frame: 3 years

    Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine (L2-L4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of a low energy vertebral fracture and non vertebral fracture

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years

    Lateral and front lumbar x-ray

  2. BMD at the total left hip

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 years

    Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine (L2-L4)

  3. BMD at lumbar spine and the total left hip

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years

    Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at left femoral neck and total left hip

  4. Biological assays with bone turnover marker of resorption and tryptase levels to assess mastocytosis activity

    Time frame: Baseline, then every 6 months in 3 years

    Withdrawal of 45 ml of blood

  5. Number of serious adverse events to evaluate drug tolerance

    Time frame: Every 6 months in 3 years

    • Biological assessment: complete blood count, creatinemia, electrolytes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), bilirubin, c-reactive protein (CRP), phosphocalcic analyses with calcemia, phosphoremia, parathormone, vitamin D (25-OH-D), β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) (if needed)
    • Clinical assessment: blood pressure, pulse, weight, height, PS, temperature
  6. Number of non-serious adverse events to evaluate drug tolerance

    Time frame: Every 6 months in 3 years

    • Biological assessment: complete blood count, creatinemia, electrolytes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), bilirubin, c-reactive protein (CRP), phosphocalcic analyses with calcemia, phosphoremia, parathormone, vitamin D (25-OH-D), β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) (if needed)
    • Clinical assessment: blood pressure, pulse, weight, height, PS, temperature
  7. Annual variation of BMD in placebo group and number of low energy fracture compared to historical postmenopausal data

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

    Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine (L2-L4), left femoral neck and total left hip

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Collaborators

  • CEREMAST
  • URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin

Registry information

Acronym: DenosuMast

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
Registry last updated
Mar 31, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.