Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03129880

Intensive Versus Traditional Voice Therapy

The purpose of this study is to determine if there are differences in treatment outcomes between traditional voice therapy, performed weekly for a maximum of 6 weeks versus intensive voice therapy, consisting of 4-6 therapy sessions performed within one day.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Wisconsin-Madison Voice and Swallow Clinic

Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States

About this study

The goal of voice therapy is optimal long-term vocal quality and communication function with minimal recurrence. Traditional voice therapy for dysphonia typically consists of one to two therapy sessions each week with a single clinician for about 8 weeks. Another approach of voice therapy is intensive short-term therapy also known as "boot camp." This approach, borrows from the disciplines of neurobiology, exercise physiology, motor learning, and psychotherapy which describe desirable learning and behavior changes influenced by practice that involves high-intensity overload, variability, and specificity of training. A few studies have showed that "Boot Camp" model of intensive therapy resulted in comparable gains in voice quality and vibratory mechanics and may promote better patient satisfaction and attendance.

While such findings support the notion that intensive voice therapy may enhance voice therapy outcomes, no study to date has examined patient response to the "Boot Camp" approach to voice therapy. The investigators will compare the outcomes of traditional, weekly voice therapy and intensive voice therapy with multiple sessions in one day.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with a Voice disorder
  • Diagnosed with benign vocal fold lesions and/or hyper-function
  • First/primary propose treatment modality is voice therapy
  • Patients who are appropriate for either standard of care treatment modality (traditional or intensive voice therapy)
  • Willingness to participate in either standard of care treatment modality
  • All races
  • Males and females
  • English speaking

Exclusion criteria

  • Younger than 18
  • Inability or unwillingness to participate in one of the standard of care treatment modalities
  • Laryngeal Surgery or procedures during course of study
  • Prisoners

Treatment and study plan

Weekly Voice Therapy

Behavioral

Participants will be randomized to receive weekly voice therapy

Intensive Voice Therapy

Behavioral

Participants will be randomized to receive multiple sessions of voice therapy in one day.

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-efficacy and readiness scale Changes

    Time frame: Baseline compared to Immediately post voice therapy

    Pre to Post difference in participant's self-efficacy for voice practice and healthy voice technique between therapy groups and within subsets of subjects - readiness ruler of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely)

  2. Self-efficacy and readiness scale Change

    Time frame: Baseline compared to 12 weeks post voice therapy

    Pre to Post difference in participant's self-efficacy for voice practice and healthy voice technique between therapy groups and within subsets of subjects - readiness ruler of 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Voice-related Outcomes in Response to Intensive Versus Traditional Therapy Programs

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Apr 26, 2017
Registry last updated
May 16, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.