Syracuse University
Syracuse, New York, 13244, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Jonathan Preston, PhD
CONTACT
Nicole Caballero, MS
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05929859
The goal of this randomized-controlled trial is to compare distributed treatment schedules and intensive treatment schedules in 84 school-age children with residual speech sound disorders. The main question it aims to answer is:
* How does intensive and distributed treatment affect speech sound learning in residual speech sound disorder?
Some participants will be treated with a traditional Distributed schedule of 2 sessions per weeks for 8 weeks (16 hours total), whereas others will be treated with an Intensive schedule and will complete 16 hours of treatment in 4 weeks.
Interested in participating?
Request Info9 year–17 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Syracuse, New York, 13244, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Jonathan Preston, PhD
CONTACT
Nicole Caballero, MS
CONTACT
Residual speech sound disorders are defined as speech sound disorders that persist past ~8-9 years and may lead to social, academic, and vocational limitations. Thus, there is a need to investigate how treatment schedules affect speech sound learning. The overall objective of this study is to optimize a suite of theoretically motivated, high-fidelity, motor-based treatments delivered at the appropriate intensity, despite practical barriers, for the most commonly impacted RSSD sounds: /ɹ, s/. Our central working hypothesis, supported by our preliminary work, is that Speech Motor Chaining is more efficacious when delivered intensively (i.e., closely spaced for a fixed number of sessions). The theoretical rationale is that increasing intensity early in treatment will mitigate erred practice between sessions, improving outcomes relative to more customary practice distributions. To test this hypothesis, children will be randomly assigned to receive a standard Distributed treatment schedule or an Intensive treatment schedule.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Sessions begin with Pre-practice to elicit target sounds, with verbal cueing and shaping strategies. During Structured Practice, items are practice in blocks of 6 consecutive trials (with systematic increases in difficulty), and our web-based software will manipulate the principles of motor learning, including the stimulus prompt, the participant's production, analysis of the clinician's rating, feedback prompts for the clinician, and the variability present in the practice trial. Randomized Practice will also be guided by the software and includes all linguistic levels that were produced correctly during Structured Practice, with items presented in random order.
Time frame: Before the initiation of treatment and again 10 weeks later.
To assess generalization of treatment gains to untreated words, participants will read a 200-word probe list eliciting the treated sound (/ɹ/ or /s/). Stimuli in each probe will be presented individually in randomized order. No auditory models will be provided; for children with reading difficulty, semantic cues will be provided to elicit the intended word. Individual words will be isolated from the audio record of each word probe and presented in randomized order for binary rating (correct/incorrect) by listeners who are blind to treatment condition and time point (but will see the written representation of each target word). We will use the change in percent correct as our primary measure of perceptually rated accuracy.
Time frame: 10 weeks after the start of treatment.
A chi-square test will be used to analyze the proportion of responders and non-responders (i.e., those above/below 15% change on the probes) in each group.
Time frame: Before the initiation of treatment and again 10 weeks later.
This survey asks parents and participants to report the impact of speech disorder on their child's/their social, emotional, and academic well-being. Parents and participants are asked to select a number from 1 to 5 (1 = Strongly disagree, 3 = Neutral, 5 = Strongly agree). For all questions, a higher score indicates a greater degree of negative impact of speech disorder on social, emotional, or academic well-being.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Jonathan Preston, PhD
CONTACT
Nina Benway, PhD
CONTACT
Syracuse University
Other
Acronym: iChain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04117360
Communication Disorders, Congenital Abnormalities
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06884943
Behavior, Communication
Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06831396
Behavior, Communication
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT05988515
Communication Disorders, Mental Disorders
Syracuse, New York, United States
View Trial Details