Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Québec, G1S2P1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT02240485
The aim of the study is to compare marital treatment to individual treatment for pathological gambling.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Québec, G1S2P1, Canada
The study as two goals: evaluate the efficacy of couple treatment for pathological gambling and develop a better understanding of the individual (substance use, mental health) and couple dimensions (communication, marital satisfaction, violence) as intermediate variables explaining this efficacy. Couples will be randomized between the couple treatment and the treatment as usual (individual or group). The experimental couple treatment is offered over 8 to 12 sessions of 90 minutes. The couple treatment called (Integrative Couple Therapy for Pathological Gambling - ICT-PG) is inspired by the "Alcohol Behavior Couple Therapy" from Epstein and McCrady, to which the team added diverse components to adjust to gamblers. During the sessions, the focus is on a) reducing/stopping gambling behaviors, b) helping the partner to stop behaviors facilitating gambling habits and rise the frequency of behaviors incompatible with gambling habits and c) improve marital components (communication, sharing positive moments, negotiation, mutual support).
The control group receives individual or group treatment as already offered by the specialized centers in addiction. Their partner can receive individual intervention if desired. All participants are recruited in Specialized Addiction Treatment Centers in Quebec province, Canada. Evaluation of participants is done at admission, three, nine and 18 months post-admission.
Repeated measures ANOVA will be used to compared evolutions of groups over time. Multiple regression will allow the estimation of components roles into as intermediate variables to predict rehabilitation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The experimental couple treatment is offered over 8 to 12 sessions of 90 minutes. The couple treatment called (Integrative Couple Therapy for Pathological Gambling - ICT-PG) is inspired by the "Alcohol Behavior Couple Therapy" from Epstein and McCrady, to which the team added diverse components to adjust to gamblers. During the sessions, the focus is on a) reducing/stopping gambling behaviors, b) helping the partner to stop behaviors facilitating gambling habits and rise the frequency of behaviors incompatible with gambling habits and c) improve marital components (communication, sharing positive moments, negotiation, mutual support).
Other names: Couple therapy
The control group receive individual or group treatment as already offered by the specialized centers in addiction.Their partner can receive individual intervention if desired.
Other names: treatment as usual
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Gamblers
The G-SAS is a 12-item self-rated scale designed to assess gambling symptom severity and change during treatment.
Each 12-item scale has a score ranging from 0 - 4 (adjective anchors for 0 and 4 vary for each item but "0 means no symptoms" and "4 means extreme symptoms").
All items ask for an average symptom based on the past 7 days (average urge, frequency, duration and control,thoughts associated with gambling,time spent on gambling,anticipatory tension and/or excitement, emotional distress).
The total score ranges from 0 to 48.
A score between 8 and 20 is an indicator of low urges to gamble, between 21 and 30, moderate urges, between 31 and 40 severe urges and a score of over 40 reveals the presence of extreme urges in the player.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
Among 12 types of gambling activities, the highest frequency of gambling behaviors for the past 6 months (never = 0; every or almost every day=5). Maximum score is 5. The higher is the score, the higher is the frequency.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
The DEBA-Jeu is a very brief screening grid comprising eight Likert-type items in five points (never = 0, always = 4). The eight items form a scale where the total score varies between 0 and 32. The suggested breaking points are as follows: 0 to 1 = No problem gambling; 2 to 5 =Problem gambling ; 6 to 24 = High probability of problem gambling.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Gamblers
The Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI) is a 9-item measure with a 4-point Likert-type scale (0 = Never, 3 = Almost always).It asks questions about an individual's gambling habits in the last three months from four categories:
Gambling involvement; Problem gambling behaviour; Adverse Consequences; Correlates of problem gambling.
Scores for the nine items are summed, and the results are interpreted as follows: 0 = non-problem ; 1-4 = low risk; 5-7 = moderate risk; 8 and + (maximum 27) = probable pathological player.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Gamblers
Total Money spent in canadian dollars for all gambling activities during the last 3 months previous each research interview.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
The ICOG is used to measure two aspects of control related to the JHA processes, namely the level of control over the desire to start playing (e.g., when I decide not to play, I watch stick to that decision) as well as the level of control once the game has started (e.g., when I knew I had little time to play, I would limit myself to the scheduled time). This questionnaire has a total of 10 items and uses a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from "Never = 1" to "Always = 5", with 4 inverted items.
The total score varies between 10 and 50. A high control represents a score between 10 and 16, a moderate control between 17 and 23 and a score of 24 and more presents a low control in the player.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
This questionnaire measures people's beliefs about gambling. The ICROLJ has 29 items and uses a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from "Strongly disagree" = 0 to "Strongly agree"=4. To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 116.Higher the score is, more it indicates the presence of erroneous beliefs.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
Short questionnaire of 10 items, assessing to what extent the respondent considers his gambling habits in the last 6 months have harmed various aspects of his life (financial, living conditions, marital, physical health, professional life, social, legal and family). A 5-point Likert-type scale is used "Not at all = 0" to "Extremely = 4". To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 40.Higher the score is, more it's indicate that the respondent is experiencing negative impacts because of his gambling habits.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
Short questionnaire of 10 items, assessing to what extent the respondent considers that his partner's gambling habits have harmed various aspects of his life in the last 6 months (financial, living conditions, marital, physical health, professional life, social, legal and family). A 5-point Likert-type scale is used "Not at all = 0" to "Extremely = 4". To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher the score is, more it's indicate that the respondent is experiencing negative impacts because of his partner's gambling habits.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
This questionnaire measures people's beliefs about gambling. The ICROLJ has 29 items and uses a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from "Strongly disagree" = 0 to "Strongly agree"=4.
To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 116. Higher the score is, more it indicates the presence of erroneous beliefs.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
This questionnaire measure the quality of the support received and given perceived by the two members of the couple. It consists of a total of 8 questions, with a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never; 5 = always).
The total score shows support received and support gave, higher is the result, more it indicates that the member of the couple gave support and receives it (score min = 0 and score max=40).
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
This instrument is used to measure psychological distress, including symptoms of depression and anxiety. We used the version of the questionnaire with 14 items. A Likert-type scale ranging from "never = 1" to "very often = 3" is used and the respondent must respond according to their condition during the last seven days. To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 42. A score of 26 and above indicates a high level of psychological distress.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
This instrument is used to measure depressive symptoms in an individual. It measures these symptoms as defined in the American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) for depressive episodes.This questionnaire has 20 items and it assesses how the psychological well-being of the person during the last week. A 4-point Likert-type scale is used ranging from "0 = Never, very rarely (less than a day)" to a rating of "3 = Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)" The score can therefore vary from 0 to 60, the higher it is the higher the risk of depression. For a man, a threshold of 17 indicates a risk of depression and for a woman the same threshold is 23.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
This instrument is used to measure psychological distress, including symptoms of depression and anxiety. We used the version of the questionnaire with 14 items. A Likert-type scale ranging from "never = 1" to "very often = 3" is used and the respondent must respond according to their condition during the last seven days. To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 42. A score of 26 and above indicates a high level of psychological distress.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
This instrument is used to measure depressive symptoms in an individual. It measures these symptoms as defined in the American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) for depressive episodes.This questionnaire has 20 items and it assesses how the psychological well-being of the person during the last week. A 4-point Likert-type scale is used ranging from "0 = Never, very rarely (less than a day)" to a rating of "3 = Frequently, all the time (5 to 7 days)" The score can therefore vary from 0 to 60, the higher it is the higher the risk of depression. For a man, a threshold of 17 indicates a risk of depression and for a woman the same threshold is 23.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
This questionnaire makes it possible to measure the quality of the support received and given perceived by the two members of the couple. It consists of a total of 8 questions, with a 5-point Likert scale (1 = never; 5 = always).
The total score shows support received and support gave, higher is the result, more it indicates that the member of the couple gave support and receives it (score min = 0 and score max=40).
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
The MSI is used to measure marital stability in a couple. It comprises a series of 14 items (with inverted items) in a "true" or "false" format thus aiming to assess the risk of separation in this couple (e.g., I very often have ideas of divorce, until once a week or more). Marital distress is measured in terms of concrete actions taken by members of the couple in order to end their union. The total score is between 0 and 14. The higher the scores, the higher the risk of separation and marital distress. A threshold of 8 is considered to be a severe indicator of separation.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
The MSI is used to measure marital stability in a couple.
It comprises a series of 14 items (with inverted items) in a "true" or "false" format thus aiming to assess the risk of separation in this couple (e.g., I very often have ideas of divorce, until once a week or more). Marital distress is measured in terms of concrete actions taken by members of the couple in order to end their union. The total score is between 0 and 14. The higher the scores, the higher the risk of separation and marital distress. A threshold of 8 is considered to be a severe indicator of separation.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale is an ultra-brief measure degree of marital satisfaction within the couple.
The short version is made up of only 4 items (considered divorce, estimation of the quality of the relation, confide to mate, degree of happiness): three of which are on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (all the time) to 5 (never) , while the final item is on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (extremely happy) to 6 (perfect).
Theoretically possible maximum score of 21, and minimum 0. Scores lower than 11 indicating relationship distress, scores between 12 and 14 corresponding to medium satisfaction and scores upper 15 indicating good marital satisfaction.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale is an ultra-brief measure degree of marital satisfaction within the couple.
The short version is made up of only 4 items (considered divorce, estimation of the quality of the relation, confide to mate, degree of happiness): three of which are on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (all the time) to 5 (never) , while the final item is on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 (extremely happy) to 6 (perfect).
Theoretically possible maximum score of 21, and minimum 0. Scores lower than 11 indicating relationship distress, scores between 12 and 14 corresponding to medium satisfaction and scores upper 15 indicating good marital satisfaction.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
The psychological violence suffered is a subscale of the CTS-2 questionnaire which aims to assess the manifestations of psychological violence committed against the Gambler in the last 3 months. It is made up of 14 items that are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (never happened = 0, 1 time = 1, 2 times = 2, 3 to 5 times = 3, 6 to 10 times = 4, 11 to 20 = 5, more than 20 times = 6). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 84. The higher it is, more it indicates that the respondent has suffered episodes of violence.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
This lists of skills consist of 17 items that expressed in statements representing observable verbal behaviors.Participants were asked to report frequency estimates of their own use of such verbal behaviors using a 4 point likert scale (0 = almost never, 4 = almost always). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 68. The higher the score is, more it indicates the presence of good communication skills.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
This instrument has 9 items, using a 7-point Likert-type scale. It is used in order to better understand the negotiation and conflict resolution skills that the couple members have used within their marital relationship in the last three months.
The score varies between 9 and 63. A high score indicates a greater degree of perceived problem-solving skill within the marital relationship.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
This questionnaire is used to identify the coping strategies used to cope with gambling's habits in the last three months. The subscale is made up of 6 items marked from 0 to 3 (0 = not used; 3 = used a lot). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 18. Higher the score is, more it indicates the respondent's tendency to adopt the behaviors described by the subscale when he is in a stressful situation.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Gamblers
Number of alcohol standard units (Canada, 1 unit = 13,6g of alcohol) per week during the last three months.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Gamblers
Frequency of cannabis use per week in the last three months with a 5-point Likert-type scale (never = 0, 3 times a week or more = 4). Higher the score is, more it indicates a high frequency of cannabis use.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Gamblers
The physical violence suffered is a subscale of the CTS-2 questionnaire which aims to assess the manifestations of physical violence committed against the Gambler in the last 3 months. It is made up of 18 items that are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (never happened = 0, 1 time = 1, 2 times = 2, 3 to 5 times = 3, 6 to 10 times = 4, 11 to 20 = 5, more than 20 times = 6). The total score corresponds to the average obtained on the 18 items, the higher it is, more it indicates that the respondent has suffered episodes of violence.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for the Partner
The physical violence suffered is a subscale of the CTS-2 questionnaire which aims to assess the manifestations of physical violence committed against the partner in the last 3 months. It is made up of 18 items that are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (never happened = 0, 1 time = 1, 2 times = 2, 3 to 5 times = 3, 6 to 10 times = 4, 11 to 20 = 5, more than 20 times = 6). The total score corresponds to the average obtained on the 18 items, the higher it is, more it indicates that the respondent has suffered episodes of violence.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
The psychological violence suffered is a subscale of the CTS-2 questionnaire which aims to assess the manifestations of psychological violence committed against the partner in the last 3 months. It is made up of 14 items that are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (never happened = 0, 1 time = 1, 2 times = 2, 3 to 5 times = 3, 6 to 10 times = 4, 11 to 20 = 5, more than 20 times = 6). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 84. The higher it is, more it indicates that the respondent has suffered episodes of violence.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Gamblers
This questionnaire is used to identify the coping strategies used to cope with gambling's habits in the last three months. The subscale is made up of 9 items marked from 0 to 3 (0 = not used; 3 = used a lot). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 27. Higher the score is, more it indicates the respondent's tendency to adopt the behaviors described by the subscale when he is in a stressful situation.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Gamblers
This questionnaire is used to identify the coping strategies used to cope with gambling's habits in the last three months. The subscale is made up of 6 items marked from 0 to 3 (0 = not used; 3 = used a lot). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 18.Higher the score is, more it indicates the respondent's tendency to adopt the behaviors described by the subscale when he is in a stressful situation.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners This instrument has 9 items, using a 7-point Likert-type scale. It is used in order to better understand the negotiation and conflict resolution skills that the couple members have used within their marital relationship in the last three months.The score varies between 9 and 63. A high score indicates a greater degree of perceived problem-solving skill within the marital relationship.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Gamblers
This lists of skills consist of 17 items that expressed in statements representing observable verbal behaviors.Participants were asked to report frequency estimates of their own use of such verbal behaviors using a 4 point likert scale (0 = almost never, 4 = almost always). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 68.The higher the score is, more it indicates the presence of good communication skills.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
This questionnaire is used to identify coping strategies to cope with stressful situations caused by their spouse's gambling habits in the last three months. The subscale is made up of 6 items marked from 0 to 3 (0 = not used; 3 = used a lot). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 18.Higher the score is, more it indicates the respondent's tendency to adopt the behaviors described by the subscale when he is in a stressful situation.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
This questionnaire is used to identify coping strategies to cope with stressful situations caused by their spouse's gambling habits in the last three months. The subscale is made up of 6 items marked from 0 to 3 (0 = not used; 3 = used a lot). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 18.Higher the score is, more it indicates the respondent's tendency to adopt the behaviors described by the subscale when he is in a stressful situation.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome Measure for Partners
This questionnaire is used to identify coping strategies to cope with stressful situations caused by their spouse's gambling habits in the last three months. The subscale is made up of 9 items marked from 0 to 3 (0 = not used; 3 = used a lot). To compute a total score, all item' score are summed. The total score ranges from 0 to 27.Higher the score is, more it indicates the respondent's tendency to adopt the behaviors described by the subscale when he is in a stressful situation.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Partners
Number of alcohol standard units (Canada, 1 unit = 13,6g of alcohol) per week during the last three months.
Time frame: Admission, 3, 9 and 18 month post-admission (The first admission was March 2011 and the last admission will be June 2016)
Outcome measure for Partners
Frequency of cannabis use per week in the last three months with a 5-point Likert-type scale (never = 0, 3 times a week or more = 4). Higher the score is, more it indicates a high frequency of cannabis use.
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Other
Integrative Couple Treatment for Pathological Gambling or Individual Treatment: A Comparison of Efficacy
Acronym: ICT-PG
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02337634
Behavior, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01528982
Behavior, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01215357
Behavior, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05506384
Behavior, Behavior, Addictive
Lund, Sweden
View Trial Details