Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06673316

Integrating Design Thinking Into Undergraduate Nursing Education

Previous studies have demonstrated that design thinking workshops can indeed produce these effects in healthcare education settings. However, its effectiveness in nursing curriculum is inconclusive. This research project aims to introduce and integrate design thinking principles into the undergraduate nursing program at the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), the Nethersole School of Nursing. By implementing a comprehensive study encompassing desktop research, a 3-hour introductory workshop, and pre- and post-evaluations over a 9-month period, the investigators seek to enhance nursing students' problem-solving skills, empathy, creativity, collaboration, and patient-centered care attitude.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Nethersole School of Nursing, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong

About this study

Subjects A group of 50 second-year undergraduate nursing students at CUHK Nethersole School of Nursing who volunteer to participate in the research. Participants will be randomly assigned to either: i) Intervention group (n=25): Receives the design thinking workshop; ii) Control group (n=25): Receives no intervention (continues with regular curriculum). According to Hertzog (2008), a minimum of 25 subjects per group would be considered sufficient for the purposes of pilot testing. Students who have prior experience in joining design thinking workshop will be excluded.

Methodology This study employs a pilot randomized controlled design to evaluate the impact of a design thinking workshop on undergraduate nursing students' problem-solving abilities and related skills. The methodology encompasses a comprehensive literature review, pre- and post-workshop assessments, and a 3-hour introductory workshop on design thinking principles applied to healthcare challenges.

  • Systematic review and preparation of material A systematic review will be conducted to examine existing applications of design thinking in healthcare education, particularly in nursing, informing workshop curriculum development in terms of content, delivery method and evaluation approach.
  • Pre-Workshop Evaluation An online survey one month before the workshop will be conducted to assess participants' baseline skills and attitudes using validated instruments. These instruments measure problem-solving abilities, empathy, creativity, collaboration, and patient-centered care attitudes.
  • Design Thinking Workshop A 3-hour introductory workshop will cover the five stages of design thinking: Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test. Students will work on scenario of real-world healthcare challenges, and apply design thinking principles to develop innovative solutions.
  • Post-Workshop Evaluation Immediately after the workshop, participants will complete a post-workshop survey using the same instruments as the pre-workshop evaluation, allowing for comparison of scores.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergraduate nursing students at CUHK Nethersole School of Nursing who volunteer to participate in the research.

Exclusion criteria

  • Nil

Treatment and study plan

Design thinking workshop

Other

The workshop will cover the five stages of design thinking, allowing students to apply these principles to real-world healthcare challenges in their future practice.

Primary outcomes

  1. Problem-solving Abilities

    Time frame: Baseline

    rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)

  2. Problem-solving Abilities

    Time frame: immediately after workshop

    rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Creativity

    Time frame: Baseline

    rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)

  2. Creativity

    Time frame: immediately after workshop

    rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)

  3. Collaboration

    Time frame: Baseline

    rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)

  4. Collaboration

    Time frame: immediately after workshop

    rating on the Eight subscales of capabilities in Student engagement questionnaire (SEQ) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)

  5. Empathy

    Time frame: Baseline

    rating on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions Student Version (JSE-HPS) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)

  6. Empathy

    Time frame: immediately after workshop

    rating on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions Student Version (JSE-HPS) (1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly Agree)

  7. Patient-centered Care attitude

    Time frame: Baseline

    rating on the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), 1= strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree

  8. Patient-centered Care attitude

    Time frame: immediately after workshop

    rating on the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), 1= strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Integrating Design Thinking Into Undergraduate Nursing Education: a Pilot RCT

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 4, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.