Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07173335

Integrated Healthy Lifestyle and Pain Care for People With Musculoskeletal Conditions Living in Rural Areas.

This study aims to compare the effects of an in-person physiotherapist-led lifestyle-focused pain care intervention with a virtual multidisciplinary lifestyle-focused pain care intervention on pain impact in people with musculoskeletal conditions and lifestyle risks.

Adults residing in rural and regional locations in New South Wales (AUS) with musculoskeletal conditions (low back, knee or hip pain) recruited from hospital outpatient services (physiotherapy, emergency or orthopaedics) or in response to social media advertisements. Eligible consenting participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either in-person physiotherapy lifestyle intervention or the virtual enabled multidisciplinary intervention. Randomisation will be conducted using an electronic central randomisation service to ensure concealment of treatment allocation.

Participants in both arms (in-person and virtual care) will have up to 10 consultations over six months and follow similar principles based on the previous Healthy Lifestyle for Pain (HeLP) intervention, but differ in their mode of delivery and access to multidisciplinary care.

Participant data will be collected at baseline and weeks 12, 26, 39 and 52. The primary outcome will be Pain Impact measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29). The secondary outcomes will include participant's health behaviors and mediating outcomes, economic outcomes, process outcomes and adverse events.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University Centre for Rural Health, University of Sydney

Lismore, New South Wales, 2480, Australia

Location contact

Christopher M Williams, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+61 1300 965 800

About this study

One in three Australians experience a musculoskeletal condition, with rural residents experiencing 10% to 30% greater burden. People with musculoskeletal conditions also experience higher rates of chronic health problems and higher prevalence of lifestyle risks (overweight, smoking, physically inactive and poor diet). As many as 75% of people with musculoskeletal conditions have three or more lifestyle risk factors, and those living in rural and remote areas have up to 10% increased prevalence of such risks compared to those living in metropolitan or regional areas. Poorer access to health services for musculoskeletal conditions means patients have higher attendance to emergency departments and increased hospitalisations, which also puts additional strain on tertiary healthcare systems. These factors contribute to a greater burden of musculoskeletal disease in rural populations that is 1.4 times higher than metropolitan populations.

Given the links between musculoskeletal conditions and lifestyle risks, and evidence from meta-analyses, many clinical practice guidelines recommend care for musculoskeletal conditions integrates a focus on lifestyle risks (e.g. weight or smoking). Moreover, surveys of patients with co-existing musculoskeletal conditions and lifestyle risks indicate that most have a preference for integrated care that addresses lifestyle risks. Despite this, less than 25% of such patients receive any support to improve lifestyle. The failure of health services to integrate care for pain and lifestyle risks is a missed opportunity to provide treatment that offers optimal therapeutic benefit for musculoskeletal conditions, supports prevention of chronic diseases, and provides patient-centred care.

A recent trial showed that integrating a healthy lifestyle focus into care for chronic back pain achieved larger improvements in disability, mental health and quality of life, compared to guideline recommended physiotherapy care only (without a lifestyle focus). Participants provided with at least 50% of the lifestyle intervention had large clinically meaningful benefit, suggesting better access to treatment may have large population benefit. Process evaluation of the trial revealed that patients wanted more flexible delivery options to access the intervention, including digital and virtual care options. In response to patient input, about better access to treatment, the HeLP-R trial was designed to compare following two delivery modalities of the program.

  • An in-person physiotherapist-led model and referral to a telephone-based health coaching. This intervention aligns with how physiotherapist care is normally delivered in outpatient settings.
  • A multidisciplinary model delivered remotely by virtual care, including physiotherapy, dietitian, psychology with additional smoking cessation or alcohol counselling, based on patient health needs. This intervention aligns with feedback from patients and clinicians to provide comprehensive yet flexible care.

MODEL OF CARE:

The model of care being tested across the two delivery modalities includes two core principles to support the integration of healthy lifestyle support into pain care: 1) Learning about pain and its causes; and 2) supporting effective behaviour change for healthy lifestyle.

  • 'Learning about pain' is supported in clinical consultations and with education resources. Learning about pain is for clinicians and participants. Clinicians aim to learn about the participant's journey, their pain history and understanding and beliefs about pain. For participants, learning about pain aims to create conceptual change about the causes of pain, provide reassurance about the safety of movement, introduce lifestyle as a potential influence of musculoskeletal pain, and develop motivation to undertake self-management plan focussed on appropriate lifestyle targets. Clinical consultations use principles of motivational interviewing and psychoeducation and are guided by program specific communication aids. Educational resources (electronic and hard copy) are provided to participants in interactive and reflective formats to reinforce learning concepts.
  • 'Supporting effective behaviour change' involves co-development of a tailored pain and lifestyle management plan. Clinicians assess the participants stage of change for nominated lifestyle risks (weight, diet, physical activity, smoking, sleep, alcohol) and use behaviour change techniques such as goal setting, action planning, problem solving and monitoring throughout clinical consultations. As appropriate, participants are offered referral to relevant lifestyle risk reduction services which provide telephone-based healthy lifestyle coaching or smoking cessation counselling over 6 calls (each).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years and over, with one or more of the following chronic musculoskeletal conditions (pain or disability due to knee or hip, or non-specific low back pain) present for more than three months;
  • Average pain intensity over the last week of 3 or more on a 11-point numerical rating scale OR pain interference of at least 'somewhat' (3 out 5) on item 27 of the PROMIS 29;
  • At least one of the following lifestyle risk factors: Body Mass Index of greater than 25kg/m2, less than 30mins of physical activity on five or more days of the week, current smoker or vaper, consumes less than two serves of fruits or five serves of vegetables per day, drinks more than 10 standard drinks in a week, or more than 4 standard drinks on any one day, or 'poor' or 'very poor' sleep quality for item 6 of the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index.

Exclusion criteria

  • Receiving healthcare for ALL eligible lifestyle risks;
  • Had bariatric surgery in the last 12 months or have planned bariatric surgery in the next 6 months;
  • Have planned orthopaedic surgery in the next 6 months;
  • Cannot actively or safely engage in the intervention or study procedures due to a medical comorbidity or constraint (e.g. impaired cognition, unable to use telehealth services, attend appointments, or adapt meals or activity);
  • Pain due to suspected serious cause, (e.g spinal infection, cancers, fracture, systemic rheumatic disease, cauda equina syndrome, diagnosis of radiculopathy);
  • Pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next 6 months.

Treatment and study plan

In-person physiotherapist led integrated healthy lifestyle and pain care

Behavioral

Participants allocated to in-person intervention will be offered:

A) Up to four in-person physiotherapist consultations (up to one hour in duration) over 12 weeks (weeks 1, 3, 6, and 12);

B) Tailored pain education and healthy lifestyle education and resource bundles, including video content, web resources and interactive tools sent to participants via email or text;

C) Referral to telephone-based population wide health behaviour change support services, the NSW Get Healthy Coaching and information service and the Quitline for smokers, by the week 12 consultation (up to 6 telehealth consultations).

Total = up to 10 consultations over 6 months.

Virtual multidisciplinary integrated healthy lifestyle and pain care

Behavioral

Participants allocated to the virtual multidisciplinary intervention will receive:

A) 10 consultations over 6 months with a multidisciplinary team, including a minimum 4 with a physiotherapist (week 1, 3, 6, 12) and remainder with a dietitian and/or psychologist, tailored to participants needs. Virtual care consultations may be individual or joint multidisciplinary sessions conducted on standard virtual care platforms used by NSW Health. Consultation will be up to one hour in duration, or use an equivalent total duration with a higher frequency schedule. Where appropriate, participants may be referred to alcohol or smoking cessation support, including individualised virtual or telephone-based counselling with access to nicotine replacement therapy;

B) Tailored pain education and healthy lifestyle education and resource bundles, including video content, web resources and interactive tools sent to participants via email or text.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Impact

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Pain Impact is measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29). PROMIS-29 is a validated self-report measure that assesses pain, function, and well-being in physical, mental, and social domains. The Pain Impact Score (range 8-50) uses pain intensity, physical function, and pain interference subdomains.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported (PROMIS -29 subdomain); average pain score in the last 7 days on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale.

  2. Physical Function

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; PROMIS -29 subdomain (4 items measured from 1 to 5 in ability to complete, total score 20).

  3. Depression

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; PROMIS -29 subdomains

  4. Anxiety

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; PROMIS -29 subdomains

  5. Sleep disturbance

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; PROMIS -29 subdomain.

  6. Health-related quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported, European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Questionnaire

  7. Weight

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported weight (kilograms) to the nearest gram.

  8. Pain self-efficacy

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire 2. Two item self-efficacy questionnaire how confident you are that you can do certain activities despite the pain (scale 0-6).

  9. Physical activity levels

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), reported as overall physical activity (MET-mins/week), proportion meeting recommended activity and levels of activity for work, travel and recreation.

  10. Diet quality

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-Reported; Dietary Guidelines Index.

  11. Smoking status

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; adapted from the NSW Health Population Survey smoking status question (including vaping) and Fagerstrom nicotine dependance question.

  12. Alcohol Consumption

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise (AUDIT-C scored 0-12). Reported as a continuous use score and the proportion with risky alcohol consumption (≥4 for men and ≥3 for women).

  13. Pain beliefs

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; Pain Beliefs Questionnaire.

  14. Adverse events

    Time frame: Enrolment until end of treatment, and at week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; "Since the last time we spoke to you have you had any new medical conditions or an exacerbation of another existing condition?"

    Clinical administrative data collected at all participant consultations.

  15. Pain Interference

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; PROMIS -29 subdomain (4 items measured from 1 to 5 for level of interference, total score 20).

  16. Fatigue

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Description: Self-reported; PROMIS -29 subdomain (4 items measured from 1 to 5 for feelings of fatigue, total score 20).

  17. Participation

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Description: Self-reported; PROMIS -29 subdomain (4 items measured from 1 to 5 in ability to participate, total score 20).

  18. Cognition

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Self-reported; PROMIS -29 subdomain (2 items measured from 1 to 5 for level of difficulty, total score 10).

Other outcomes

  1. Fidelity

    Time frame: Enrolment until end of treatment at 26 weeks

    Process outcome: treatment protocol checklist completed using clinical administrative data and summaries of treatment provided.

  2. Perceived importance

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26.

    Mediator:

    Self-reported; 3 items (0-10, numerical rating scale) on perceived importance and benefits of healthy lifestyle change.

  3. Patient Reported Experience Measures

    Time frame: Week 12

    Process outcome: Self-reported; 7 or 10 item (group dependant) Patient Reported Experience Measures Outpatient Questionnaire.

  4. Treatment Engagement (consultations)

    Time frame: Enrolment until end of treatment at Week 26.

    Process outcome: Number of consultations attended by a participant and resources provide, detailed in clinical administrative logs, completed by a treating clinicians.

  5. Treatment Engagement (telephone services)

    Time frame: Week 26.

    Process outcome: Self-reported number of calls completed by a participant with telephone support services, if referred.

  6. Work absenteeism and presenteeism

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Economic outcome: Self-reported; number of days off paid work, and days spent at work with reduced productivity in the last 3 months.

  7. Healthcare utilization

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Economic outcome: Self-reported; type and number of encounters of health care services and carer support services utilised for back, knee or hip pain, over the last 3 months reported in a participant itemised diary.

  8. Medication use

    Time frame: Baseline (enrolment), week 12, 26, 39 and 52.

    Economic outcome: Self-reported; name and dose of medicines used for back, knee or hip pain, over the last 3 months reported in a participant itemised diary.

  9. Intervention cost

    Time frame: Enrolment until end of treatment at 26 weeks

    Economics outcome: Intervention delivery costs estimated with clinical administrative captured at clinical encounters and patient reported usage of services, and costed with published standardised rates for clinician time, resources and external services.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Christopher Williams, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+61 1300 965 800

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sydney

Other

Collaborators

  • Medical Research Future Fund

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of In-person and Virtual Delivery of Healthy Lifestyle Focused Care for People With Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions Living in Rural Areas: a Non-interiority Randomised Trial.

Acronym: HeLP-R

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Sep 15, 2025
Registry last updated
Sep 15, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.