Pressure Microcatheter guided strategy - PIOS MC
ProcedureUse of Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive treatment according to the incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) .
NCT Number: NCT05437900
Recently, a new device for measuring physiological lesion severity, the pressure microcatheter, was introduced. The pressure microcatheter provides similar information to the conventional measurement technique but differs as it is easily advanced on a customary coronary wire and simplifies pullback maneuvers. The pressure microcatheter has been shown to provide comparable FFR results to pressure wires.
Insightful-FFR is an investigator-driven, multicenter, randomized, open-label and prospective trial of patients with stable coronary artery disease or stabilised non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with epicardial stenosis considered for PCI aiming at comparing clinical outcomes between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire-guided strategies. The study hypothesis states that the use of a Pressure Microcatheter for clinical decision making would be non-inferior to pressure wire-based strategy
After determining the presence of a coronary artery disease/ stabilized acute coronary syndrome, patients will be randomized to use a pressure microcatheter (investigational device) or a pressure wire (comparator) to guide and optimize percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be followed up in hospital at 12 months and yearly until five years.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
OLV Aalst, Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Use of Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive treatment according to the incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) .
Use of Pressure Wire during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive treatment according to the incremental optimization strategy (PIOS) .
Use of Pressure Microcatheter during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive standard of care treatment.
Use of Pressure Wire during PCI. After the PCI, the patient will receive standard of care treatment.
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the combined rate of all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization between pressure microcatheter and pressure wire strategies at 12-months follow-up.
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel failure (TVF) defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularisation (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC.
Time frame: During the hospitalisation (from admission to the hospital until discharge after the procedure)
Compare in-hospital resource utilisation (cost from all the procedures during the hospitalisation to discharge in Euros) between microcatheter and pressure wire strategies i.e.number of pressure catheters/wires and procedural time needed to complete the procedure.
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Compare the procedure time between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies in minutes. This is the time from first to the last angiography in minutes.
Time frame: During the hospitalisation (from admission to the hospital until discharge after the procedure)
In patients undergoing PCI, compare resource utilisation (cost from all the procedures during the hospitalisation to discharge in Euros, e.g. number of catheters/wires) between a pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the procedural time in minutes between a pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies.
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 (in percentage) between pressure microcatheter (MC) PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS and SOC strategies in patients undergoing PCI.
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.80 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW strategies in patients undergoing PCI
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Compare the proportion of FFR > 0.90 (in percentage) between pressure PIOS-MC and PIOS-PW
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare the rate of symptoms-free status assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up.
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare the rate of all-cause death between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare the rate of myocardial infarction between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare the rate of unplanned revascularisation between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of cardiac death between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of target vessel myocardial infarction (MI) between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up.
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
In patients undergoing PCI, compare the rate of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR) between PIOS and SOC at 12 months follow-up
Time frame: During the procedure
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Compare the rate of angiographic complications related to vessel wiring (i.e., Angiographic dissection ≥ NHLBI type B, perforations (Ellis classification), intra-procedural thrombotic events (including slow-flow, no-reflow, side branch closure, distal embolization, and intra-procedural stent thrombosis, as per the standard angiographic core laboratory definitions) between pressure microcatheter and pressure-wire guided strategies.
Time frame: Periprocedural time frame
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the actual measure post-PCI FFR value.
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target vessel failure (TVF).
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target myocardial infarction.
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare how close the value of PPG derived from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare how close the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI).
Time frame: 12 Months follow-up
Compare how close the post-PCI residual pressure gradients from pressure microcatheter versus pressure wire corresponds to the occurence of target-vessel revascularization.
Time frame: Periprocedural timeframe
Time frame: Periprocedural timeframe
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
CoreAalst BV
Industry
Pressure Microcatheter vs Pressure Wire for Clinical Decision Making and PCI Optimization
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07258290
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Angina Pectoris
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04416581
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Anyang, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07329699
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Seoul, Select State, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT06535568
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Antineoplastic Agents
Milan, MI, Italy
View Trial Details