Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06030167

Insecure Attachment and Psychosocial Functioning in Autistic Adults Are Mediated by Depression and Paranoid Ideation

The present study examines if depressive symptoms, paranoid ideation, and emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between attachment and psychosocial functioning in autistic adults.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Parnassia Antes

Rotterdam, South Holland, 3083AK, Netherlands

About this study

The present study examines if depressive symptoms, paranoid ideation, and emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between attachment and psychosocial functioning in autistic adults. Within a cross-sectional design, we used mediation analysis to clarify the roles of co-occurring mental conditions as depressive symptoms, paranoid ideation, and (mal)adaptive emotion regulation strategies in mediating the pathway from insecure attachment to psychosocial functioning in autistic adults. Questionaires about attachment, psychosocial functioning, depressive symptoms, paranoid ideation, and emotion regulation were administered to 83 autistic adults (50 males, 33 females).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • a primary clinical diagnosis of DSM-5 ASD (APA, 2013)
  • age ≥ 18 years
  • at least eight years of education.

Exclusion criteria

  • intellectual disability (IQ ≤ 80)
  • presence of current suicidal ideation.

Treatment and study plan

Insecure attachment and psychosocial functioning in autistic adults

Behavioral

Questionaires about attachment, psychosocial functioning, depressive symptoms, paranoid ideation, and emotion regulation were administered to 83 autistic adults (50 males, 33 females).

Primary outcomes

  1. Experiences in Close Relationships - Revised questionnaire (ECR-r)

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Measuring self-rated levels of insecure attachment in 83 adults with autism spectrum disorder. Welch's two sample t-test was used to compare the ECR-r data between the participants and (non-)clinical controls drawn from the manuals of the used measure.

    The ECR-R is a 36-item measure designed to assess individual differences with respect to attachment-related anxiety (i.e., the extent to which people are insecure versus secure about the availability and responsiveness of romantic partners; items 1 to 18) and attachment-related avoidance (i.e., the extent to which people are uncomfortable being close to others versus secure depending on others; items 19 to 36). The items are scored on a 7-point scale, with higher scores (>= 4) indicating more insecure attachment. A mean score (ranging from 0 to 7) is calculated for both attachment styles.

  2. World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Measuring self-rated levels of psycho-social functioning in 83 autistic adults. Welch's two sample t-test was used to compare the WHODAS 2.0 data between the participants and (non-)clinical controls drawn from the manuals of the used measure.

    WHODAS 2.0 is a generic assessment self-report for health and disability in adults, consisting of 36 items on a 5-point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme) covering six domains: cognitions, mobility, self-care, interaction, life activities, and participation in society. WHODAS 2.0 asks the individual to rate how much difficulty they have had in specific areas of functioning during the past 30 days. WHODAS 2.0 produces standardized disability levels and profiles by summing six domain scores and converting the summary score into a metric range from 0 (= no disability) to 100 (= full disability).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition-Dutch version-Revised (BDI-2-NL-R)

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    Measuring self-rated levels of depression in 83 autistic adults. Welch's two sample t-test was used to compare the BDI-2-NL-R data between the participants and (non-)clinical controls drawn from the manuals of the used measure.

    The BDI-2-NL-R is a 21-item self report assessing the presence and severity of depressive symptoms, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994). The BDI-2-NL-R is also compatible with DSM-5 depressive disorder (APA, 2013; 2022). The items are scored on a 4-point scale with a total score ranging from 0 to 63 indicating minimal (0-13), mild (14-19), moderate (20-28), or severe (29-63) depression.

  2. Green Paranoid Thought Scales (GPTS)

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Measuring self-rated levels of paranodi thoughts in 83 autistic adults. Welch's two sample t-test was used to compare the GPTS data between the participants and (non-)clinical controls drawn from the manuals of the used measure.

    The GPTS is a 32-item self-report assessing 16 ideas of persecution and 16 ideas of social reference on a 5-point scale, with a total score ranging from 32 to 160, with higher scores indicating higher levels of paranoid ideation.

  3. FEEL-E Questionnaire for Emotion Regulation in Adults (FEEL-E)

    Time frame: 20 minutes

    Measuring self-rated levels of emotion regulation in 83 autistic adults. Welch's two sample t-test was used to compare the GPTS data between the participants and (non-)clinical controls drawn from the manuals of the used measure.

    The FEEL-E is a 72-item self-report questionnaire assessing emotion regulation strategies, consisting of six adaptive (problem-oriented action, acceptance, cognitive problem-solving, reappraisal, evoking positive feelings, forgetting) and six maladaptive (withdrawal, self-blame, resignation, rumination, negative thinking, other-blame) strategies. The items are scored on a 5-point scale with a total score ranging from 36 to 180 for each strategy (T-score < 40: below average use of strategy; T-score 40-60: average use of strategy; T-score > 60: above average use of strategy).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Parnassia Groep

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Sep 8, 2023
Registry last updated
Sep 8, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.