Nintedanib
Drug150 or 100 milligrams (mg) of nintedanib, when 150 mg is not tolerated, twice daily, administered 12 hours apart, according to the approved label.
Other names: Ofev®
NCT Number: NCT04702893
The primary objective of this observational study is to investigate the correlation between changes from baseline at 52 weeks in forced vital capacity (FVC) and changes from baseline at 52 weeks in dyspnea score points or cough score points as measured with the pulmonary fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF) questionnaire over 52 weeks of nintedanib treatment in patients suffering from chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a progressive phenotype (excluding idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Universitätsklinikum Aachen, AöR, Aachen, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
150 or 100 milligrams (mg) of nintedanib, when 150 mg is not tolerated, twice daily, administered 12 hours apart, according to the approved label.
Other names: Ofev®
Time frame: At baseline and at week 52±6.
The correlation between the change from baseline to week 52 (week 52 - baseline) in forced vital capacity (FVC) [% predicted] and change from baseline to week 52 (week 52 - baseline) in dyspnea symptom score was calculated using the Pearson's coefficient of correlation. The forced vital capacity measures the amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled from the lungs after a maximum inhalation. The dyspnea symptom score was measured using the living with pulmonary fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF). The L-PF contained a dyspnea symptom module with 12 items to assess the severity of shortness of breath, where the higher the score, the greater the impairment. The coefficient of correlation ranges from -1 to 1, indicating a negative association between the variables the closer it is to -1 and a positive association the closer it is to 1.
Time frame: At baseline and at week 52±6.
The correlation between the change from baseline to week 52 (week 52 - baseline) in forced vital capacity (FVC) [% predicted] and change from baseline to week 52 (week 52 - baseline) in cough symptom score was calculated using the Pearson's coefficient of correlation. The forced vital capacity measures the amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled from the lungs after a maximum inhalation. The cough symptom score was measured using the living with pulmonary fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF). The L-PF contained a cough symptom module with 6 items to assess the severity of cough symptoms, where the higher the score, the more severe the cough. The coefficient of correlation ranges from -1 to 1, indicating a negative association between the variables the closer it is to -1 and a positive association the closer it is to 1.
Time frame: At baseline and at week 52±6.
The correlation between the change from baseline to week 52 (week 52 - baseline) in forced vital capacity (FVC) [mL] and change from baseline to week 52 (week 52 - baseline) in dyspnea symptom score was calculated using the Pearson's coefficient of correlation. The forced vital capacity measures the amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled from the lungs after a maximum inhalation. The dyspnea symptom score was measured using the living with pulmonary fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF). The L-PF contained a dyspnea symptom module with 12 items to assess the severity of shortness of breath, where the higher the score, the greater the impairment. The coefficient of correlation ranges from -1 to 1, indicating a negative association between the variables the closer it is to -1 and a positive association the closer it is to 1.
Time frame: At baseline and at week 52±6.
The correlation between the change from baseline to week 52 (week 52 - baseline) in forced vital capacity (FVC) [mL] and change from baseline to week 52 (week 52 - baseline) in cough symptom score was calculated using the Pearson's coefficient of correlation. The forced vital capacity measures the amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled from the lungs after a maximum inhalation. The cough symptom score was measured using the living with pulmonary fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF). The L-PF contained a cough symptom module with 6 items to assess the severity of cough symptoms, where the higher the score, the more severe the cough. The coefficient of correlation ranges from -1 to 1, indicating a negative association between the variables the closer it is to -1 and a positive association the closer it is to 1.
Time frame: MMRM included measurements at week 13±6, week 26±6, week 39±6 and week 52±6. Change from baseline values at week 52±6 is reported.
This outcome measured the absolute change from baseline to week 52 in the cough symptom score, assessed by the living with pulmonary fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF). The L-PF includes a cough symptom module with 6 items to evaluate the severity of cough symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The total cough symptom score was calculated using the formula: (sum of each individual score/24)*100, ranging from 0 to 100, where the higher the score, the more severe the cough. Results were calculated as [Week 52] - [Baseline].
The analysis was performed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed independent effects for baseline value, visit, and baseline-by-visit interaction, and a random effect for each patient. Within-patient errors were represented using an unstructured variance-covariance structure.
Time frame: MMRM included measurements at week 13±6, week 26±6, week 39±6 and week 52±6. Change from baseline values at week 52±6 is reported.
This outcome measured the absolute change from baseline to week 52 in the dyspnea symptom score, assessed by the living with pulmonary fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF). The L-PF includes a dyspnea symptom module with 12 items to evaluate the severity of dyspnea symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The total dyspnea symptom score was calculated using the formula: (sum of each individual score/total score possible)*100, ranging from 0 to 100, where the higher the score, the more severe the dyspnea. Results were calculated as [Week 52] - [Baseline].
The analysis was performed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed independent effects for baseline value, visit, and baseline-by-visit interaction, and a random effect for each patient. Within-patient errors were represented using an unstructured variance-covariance structure.
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
Prospective Observational Investigation of Possible Correlations Between Change in FVC and Change in Cough or Dyspnea Scores Using the Living With Pulmonary Fibrosis Questionnaire (L-PF) Between Baseline and After Approximately 52 Weeks of Nintedanib Treatment in Patients Suffering From Chronic Fibrosing ILD With a Progressive Phenotype
Acronym: INREAL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04325217
Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Interstitial
Tokyo, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT05722340
Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Interstitial
Montpellier, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05492994
Lung Diseases, Lung Diseases, Interstitial
Hanover, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03718780
Chronic Disease, Chronic Heart Failure
Béthune, France
View Trial Details