Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02963649

IN.PACT BTK Randomized Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of IN.PACT 014 vs. PTA

To assess the safety and efficacy of the paclitaxel drug-coated balloon IN.PACT 014 versus conventional optimal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of patients with chronic total occlusions in the infrapopliteal arteries.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

AZ Sint Blasius, Dendermonde, East-Flanders, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate and has signed an EC approved consent form.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential have a negative pregnancy test ≤7 days before the procedure and are willing to use a reliable method of birth control for the duration of study participation.
  • Subject has documented chronic Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) in the target limb prior to the study procedure with Rutherford Clinical Category 4 or 5.
  • Subjects with documented infection grade 0-2 and ischemia grade 2-3 according to WIfi classification.
  • Life expectancy >1 year in the Investigator's opinion.
  • Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD) 2 - 4 mm, and confirmed by DUS assessment.
  • Total occlusions with total lesion length ≥ 40 mm (by visual estimate).
  • Lesion must be located in the infrapopliteal arteries and above the ankle joint.
  • Multiple lesions can be treated if located in separate vessels.
  • Presence of documented run-off to the foot.
  • Inflow free from flow-limiting lesion confirmed by angiography.
  • Successful pre-dilatation of the (entire) target lesion.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject unwilling or unlikely to comply to the appropriate follow-up times for the duration of the study.
  • Planned index limb amputation above the metatarsal level, or any other planned major surgery within 30 days pre or post-procedure.
  • Lesion and/or occlusions located or extending in the popliteal artery or below the ankle joint space.
  • Significant (≥50% DS) inflow lesion or occlusion in the ipsilateral iliac, SFA and popliteal arteries left untreated.
  • Failure to obtain ≤ 30% residual stenosis in pre-existing, hemodynamically significant inflow lesions in the ipsilateral iliac, SFA and popliteal artery.
  • Prior stent(s) or bypass surgery within the target vessel(s) (including stents placed within target vessels during the index procedure prior to randomization.
  • Previous DCB procedure in the target vessel within 6 months prior to index procedure.
  • Aneurysm in the target vessel.
  • Angiographic evidence of thrombus within target limb.
  • Pre-dilatation resulted in major (≥ Grade D) flow-limiting dissection or residual stenosis > 30%.
  • Use of alternative therapy e.g. atherectomy, cutting balloon, laser, radiation therapy, stents as part of target vessel treatment.
  • Recent MI or stroke < 30 days prior to the index procedure.
  • Heart failure with Ejection Fraction < 30%.
  • Known or suspected active infection at the time of the index procedure, excluding an infection of a lower extremity wound on the target limb.
  • Subjects with infection grade 3 and ischemia grade 0 and 1 according to the Wifi classification.
  • Subjects with neutrotrophic ulcers, heel pressure ulcers or calcaneal ulcers with a risk of major amputation.
  • Subjects with documented active osteomyelitis, excluding the phalanges, that is beyond cortical involvement of the bone per clinical judgement.
  • Impaired renal function (GFR <20 mL/min) and patients on dialysis.
  • Subject with vasculitis, systemic Lupus Erythematosus or Polymyalgia Rheumatica on active treatment.
  • Patient receiving systemic corticosteroid therapy.
  • Known allergies or sensitivities to heparin, aspirin (ASA), other anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapies which could not be substituted, and/or paclitaxel or an allergy to contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to the index procedure.
  • The patient is currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial that is interfering with the endpoints of this study.
  • Female subjects who are breastfeeding at the time of enrollment.

Treatment and study plan

DCB

Device

Drug Coated Balloon

PTA

Device

Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Late Lumen Loss (LLL) at 9 Months

    Time frame: 9 Months

    Late lumen loss (LLL) - The difference between minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately after percutaneous balloon angioplasty PTA and MLD at follow up, measured at 9 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite Safety Endpoint

    Time frame: 9 Months

    A composite of freedom from device- and procedure-related mortality within 30 days, freedom from major target limb amputation and freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) within 9 months post-index procedure

  2. Major Adverse Event (MAE) Rate

    Time frame: through 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

    defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR)

    Reported by using the event-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate through 60 months

  3. Functional Flow Assessment

    Time frame: at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 and 36 months

    is defined as absence of target lesion occlusion (no flow) assessed by duplex ultrasound.

  4. Death of Any Cause

    Time frame: through 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

    Death of any cause, reported by using the event-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate through 60 months

  5. Major Target Limb Amputation Rate

    Time frame: through 30 days, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

    Major Target Limb Amputation rate, reported by using the event-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate through 60 months

  6. Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) Rate

    Time frame: through 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

    Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR) rate, reported by using the event-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate through 60 months

  7. Mechanically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) Rate

    Time frame: through 37 days

    Mechanically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) rate

  8. Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) Rate

    Time frame: through 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

    Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) rate, reported by using the event-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate through 60 months

  9. Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) Rate

    Time frame: through 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

    Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) rate, reported by using the event-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate through 60 months

  10. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) Rate

    Time frame: through 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

    Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) rate, reported by using the event-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate through 60 months

  11. Status of Wound Healing

    Time frame: at 30 days, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 and 36 months

    Status of wound healing for baseline wounds: completely healed - improvement - unchanged - worsened - Amputation - skin graft; percentage of wounds in each category is presented for each treatment arm

  12. Rate of Thrombosis at the Target Lesion

    Time frame: through 30 days, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months

    Rate of thrombosis at the target lesion, reported by using the event-free survival Kaplan-Meier estimate through 60 months

  13. Device Success

    Time frame: at the time of procedure

    Calculated as the number of IN.PACT 014 Investigational devices with successful delivery, balloon inflation, deflation and retrieval of the intact study device without burst below the rated burst pressure (RBP), divided by the total number of IN.PACT 014 Investigational devices assessed in the study

  14. Clinical Success

    Time frame: up to discharge visit [between index procedure and 30-day (+/- 7 days) follow-up visit. The average days until discharge was: 9 days (with a max. of 31days) in the IN.PACT 014 arm, and 6 days (with a max. of 21days) in the PTA arm.]

    Clinical success is defined as residual stenosis of ≤ 30% without procedural complications (death, major target limb amputation, thrombosis of the target lesion, or target vessel revascularization (TVR)). If any lesion has residual stenosis > 30% or any of the complications (death, major target limb amputation, thrombosis of the target lesion, or TVR) prior to discharge, then subject is not counted as having Clinical Success.

    Clinical success is calculated as the number of index procedures with residual stenosis of ≤ 30% by core lab (use site reported data if core lab data is not available) for all target lesions and without procedural complications (death, major target limb amputation, thrombosis of the target lesion, or TVR) prior to discharge as adjudicated by CEC, divided by the number of total index procedures performed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Endovascular

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Study of IN.PACT 014 Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Balloon Catheter vs. Optimal Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for the Treatment of Chronic Total Occlusions in the Infrapopliteal Arteries

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2023
First posted
Nov 15, 2016
Registry last updated
Jul 8, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.