Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03600571

Injection Site Diversity Influences HA Distribution and Clinical Results in CP and KOA

In order to investigate the difference of intra-articular hyaluronate's distribution and compare the clinical outcomes of viscosupplementation for mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (mKOA) between the anteromedial (AM) and medial midpatellar (MMP) approach groups. This study included two parts, cadaver study (n=64) and random controlled trial (n=100). Hyaluronic acid (HA) traced by methylene blue was injected into the knee, and the intra-articular distribution of HA was assessed using a five-point scale in the cadaver study. The clinical outcomes of 5-weekly injections of HA were evaluated by WOMAC and Lequesne index and the follow-up times were at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, and 24 after the injections in the random controlled trial.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Nanfang Hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic unilateral mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (mKOA) that were defined by the American College of Rheumatology criteria
  • Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3
  • Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index (Likert version 3.1) pain subscale reached 10 or greater

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy, acute fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, gouty arthritis, traumatic arthritis, inflammatory arthritis
  • Oral Celebrex within 2 weeks, HA and lidocaine allergy, intra-articular injection of HA or corticosteroid to the target knee within the past 6 months
  • Surgery in the target knee within the past 6 months, OA of the target knee with K-L grade 4
  • Active liver and renal disease, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.

Treatment and study plan

medial midpatellar (MMP) portal

Procedure

injection medial under horizontal patella midline was administrated with the lower limb extension

anteromedial (AM) portal

Procedure

injection medial from patella tendon towards intercondylar notch was performed with the target knee 90° flexion

Primary outcomes

  1. WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)

    Time frame: baseline before the first injection

    WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.

  2. WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)

    Time frame: 1 week after the first injection

    WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.

  3. WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)

    Time frame: 2 weeks after the first injection

    WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.

  4. WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)

    Time frame: 3 weeks after the first injection

    WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.

  5. WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)

    Time frame: 4 weeks after the first injection

    WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.

  6. WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)

    Time frame: 5 weeks after the first injection

    WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.

  7. WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)

    Time frame: 14 weeks after the first injection

    WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.

  8. WOMAC (Likert version 3.1)

    Time frame: 24 weeks after the first injection

    WOMAC included three subscales: pain, stiffness and function, and each subscale was graded using a 5-point Likert scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme). Pain index score ranges from 0 to 20, whereas the stiffness score ranges from 0 to 8 and the function score ranges from 0 to 68. The reliability of the three subscales of the WOMAC was 0.82, 0.68 and 0.74, respectively.

  9. Lequesne index

    Time frame: baseline before the first injection

    The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.

  10. Lequesne index

    Time frame: 1 week after the first injection

    The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.

  11. Lequesne index

    Time frame: 2 weeks after the first injection

    The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.

  12. Lequesne index

    Time frame: 3 weeks after the first injection

    The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.

  13. Lequesne index

    Time frame: 4 weeks after the first injection

    The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.

  14. Lequesne index

    Time frame: 5 weeks after the first injection

    The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.

  15. Lequesne index

    Time frame: 14 weeks after the first injection

    The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.

  16. Lequesne index

    Time frame: 24 weeks after the first injection

    The Lequesne index questionnaire included 10 questions about pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0 (no pain, no disability) to 24 (maximum pain, stiffness and disability), and its reliability was 0.95.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Injection Site Diversity Influences Sodium Hyaluronate Distribution and Its Clinical Results in Management of Chondromalacia Patellae and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Preliminary, Multi-central, Randomize-controlled Serial Trial

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jul 26, 2018
Registry last updated
Jul 26, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.