Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07540702

Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Intradermal Tranexamic Acid for Melasma

Melasma is a chronic acquired hyperpigmentation disorder that commonly affects the face and has a significant impact on quality of life. Available treatments may improve pigmentation, but relapse is common and response can be variable.

This randomized split-face interventional study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) versus intradermal tranexamic acid (TA) in the treatment of facial melasma. Adult female patients with bilateral symmetrical facial melasma will be enrolled. In each participant, one side of the face will be randomly assigned to receive i-PRF and the contralateral side will receive intradermal TA.

Patients will undergo five treatment sessions at 2-week intervals. Clinical response will be assessed using the modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI), Antera 3D camera measurements, Physician Global Assessment, patient satisfaction, and Melasma Quality of Life (MelasQoL) questionnaire. Safety will be evaluated by recording adverse events such as pain, tenderness, erythema, swelling, infection, ecchymosis, and hematoma.

The study is designed to determine whether i-PRF is an effective and safe treatment option for melasma compared with intradermal tranexamic acid.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kasr El Aini Hospital

Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 11555, Egypt

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Heba Ahmed, Lecturer of Dermatology

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201016532351

About this study

Melasma is a common chronic hyperpigmentation disorder characterized by symmetric brown to gray-brown patches, most commonly affecting the face. It is more frequent in women and in individuals with darker skin phototypes, and it may significantly impair psychosocial well-being and quality of life. Multiple pathogenic mechanisms have been implicated, including ultraviolet exposure, hormonal influences, genetic predisposition, melanocyte hyperactivity, and dermal vascular and inflammatory changes.

Current melasma therapies include topical depigmenting agents, chemical peels, laser and light-based procedures, and oral or local tranexamic acid. However, treatment response is often incomplete and recurrence is common. Intradermal tranexamic acid has shown promising results in reducing pigmentation through inhibition of plasmin activity and downstream melanocyte stimulation.

Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) is a second-generation autologous platelet concentrate prepared without anticoagulants. It provides a fibrin scaffold and gradual release of growth factors. Based on its biologic activity, i-PRF may have a therapeutic role in melasma by modulating melanogenesis, oxidative stress, and tissue repair. Despite this rationale, clinical evidence for i-PRF in melasma remains limited.

This study is a randomized split-face clinical trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of i-PRF versus intradermal tranexamic acid in the treatment of facial melasma. Twenty-one adult female patients with mild to moderate bilateral symmetrical facial melasma, aged 18 to 50 years and with Fitzpatrick skin types III to IV, will be recruited from the outpatient dermatology clinic and cosmetology unit of Kasr El Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

For each participant, one side of the face will be randomly assigned to receive i-PRF, while the contralateral side will receive intradermal tranexamic acid. Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) will be prepared from 10 mL of venous blood collected under aseptic conditions in a plain plastic tube and centrifuged at 60 g (700 rpm) for 3 minutes. The resulting i-PRF will be injected intradermally on the randomized side after topical anesthetic application. The opposite side will receive intradermal tranexamic acid prepared under aseptic conditions and injected at 1 cm intervals into melasma lesions. Participants will receive five treatment sessions at 2-week intervals. They will also be instructed to use broad-spectrum sunscreen and to avoid other topical facial treatments during the study period.

Both participants and outcome assessors will be blinded to the treatment allocation. Assessment will be performed at baseline and at the end of the study (Day 90). The primary outcome is the percent change in modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) score from baseline to Day 90 between the i-PRF-treated side and the tranexamic-acid-treated side. Secondary outcomes include change in melanin level and vascular features measured by Antera 3D camera, Physician Global Assessment, patient satisfaction, global improvement scale, Melasma Quality of Life (MelasQoL) score, and adverse events.

Potential adverse effects include pain, tenderness, erythema, swelling, infection, ecchymosis, hematoma, and pigmentation changes. The study aims to determine whether i-PRF is an effective and safe therapeutic option for melasma compared with intradermal tranexamic acid.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of bilateral symmetrical facial melasma (epidermal or mixed type)
  • Female participants aged 18 to 50 years
  • Fitzpatrick skin types III to IV
  • Mild to moderate facial melasma
  • No melasma-specific treatment within the previous 4 weeks
  • No facial procedures, including peeling, laser resurfacing, or microneedling, within the previous 3 months
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent and comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Bleeding or coagulation disorders
  • Use of anticoagulants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or hormonal contraception
  • Active skin infection or facial inflammation
  • History of keloids or Koebner-prone conditions, such as psoriasis or vitiligo
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease, such as diabetes mellitus or autoimmune disease

Treatment and study plan

injectable platelet-rich fibrin

Biological

Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) is prepared from 10 mL of autologous venous blood collected in a plain plastic tube without additives and centrifuged at 60 g (700 rpm) for 3 minutes. The resulting fluid is aspirated immediately and injected intradermally on the randomized side of the face at a dose of 0.1 mL/cm² at 1-cm intervals using a 30-gauge insulin syringe. Five treatment sessions are administered at 2-week intervals.

Tranexamic acid 100 mg/mL (Kapron)

Drug

Tranexamic acid (Kapron ampoules, 100 mg/mL) is diluted under aseptic conditions to a final concentration of 10 mg/mL by adding 0.1 mL of tranexamic acid to normal saline to a total volume of 1 mL. After topical anesthetic application, approximately 1 mL of the prepared 10 mg/mL solution is injected intradermally into melasma lesions on the contralateral side of the face at 1-cm intervals using a 30-gauge insulin syringe. Five treatment sessions are administered at 2-week intervals.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

    The percent change in modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI) score from baseline to Day 90 will be assessed and compared between the facial side treated with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and the contralateral facial side treated with intradermal tranexamic acid.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Melanin Level Measured by Antera 3D Camera

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

    Change in average melanin level from baseline to Day 90, as measured by Antera 3D camera, will be assessed and compared between the facial side treated with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and the contralateral facial side treated with intradermal tranexamic acid.

  2. Change in Vascular Features Measured by Antera 3D Camera

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

    Change in vascular features, including hemoglobin/erythema index, from baseline to Day 90, as measured by Antera 3D camera, will be assessed and compared between the facial side treated with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and the contralateral facial side treated with intradermal tranexamic acid.

  3. Physician Global Assessment of Improvement

    Time frame: Day 90

    Improvement in melasma at Day 90 will be assessed using Physician Global Assessment (PGA) based on standardized global photographs reviewed by 2 blinded dermatologists. Improvement will be categorized as excellent (>75%), marked (50% to 75%), good (25% to 49%), fair (<25%), or no response.

  4. Change in Melasma Quality of Life (MelasQoL) Score

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

    Change in Melasma Quality of Life (MelasQoL) score from baseline to Day 90 will be assessed and compared between treatment conditions in participants with facial melasma.

  5. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to Day 90

    Incidence of adverse events during the study period will be assessed, including pain, tenderness, erythema, swelling, infection, pigmentation changes, ecchymosis, and hematoma, and will be compared between the facial side treated with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and the contralateral facial side treated with intradermal tranexamic acid.

  6. Patient Satisfaction at Day 90

    Time frame: Day 90

    Participant satisfaction with treatment outcome at Day 90 will be assessed and categorized as highly satisfied, moderately satisfied, partially satisfied, or not satisfied.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Heba Ahmed

CONTACT

[email protected]

+201016532351

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kasr El Aini Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Intradermal Tranexamic Acid in the Treatment of Melasma: A Randomized Split-Face Study

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.