Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06448377

Initiation of Airway Code: the Role of the Airway Team in Unexpected Difficult Airways

The aim of our study is to observationally examine our unexpected difficult airway incidence and intervention times. In addition, it is aimed to discuss the clinical effect of a team specialized in airway intervention intervening in cases by call on the success of airway intervention. In this discussion, it is aimed to use the opinion-opposition method.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Kocaeli City Hospital

Kocaeli, Izmıt, 41100, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Initiation of Airway Code: The Role of the Airway Team in Unexpected Difficult Airways

The incidence of difficult airway is approximately 1 in 1000 cases and poses a significant perioperative risk to patients. Various classifications, guidelines, and approaches have been developed to identify patients with difficult airways. However, even the most well-known classifications are not 100% successful in predicting difficult airways. Consequently, some unexpected difficult airway cases are encountered, and their management continues to be a subject of new research in the literature.

In situations involving difficult airways, having the same team respond to every case may pose a potential obstacle to the distribution of experience and responsibilities among other clinical staff. However, it is undeniable that experienced anesthetists are more successful in airway management, and the importance of airway-related training cannot be overstated. Similar to the code blue protocol used during cardiac arrests, the intervention of a trained external team in crisis situations, utilizing familiar equipment and applying data from previous cases for quality improvement, can provide significant benefits in airway management akin to those seen in cardiac arrests. This approach could also potentially enhance patient safety in internal medicine and surgical wards, as well as in certain intensive care units, where familiarity with airway management is limited.

This study aims to discuss the positive and negative impacts of the airway teams intervention in unexpected difficult airway situations within the operating room, using a pro-con debate method.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who will be operated under general anesthesia at Kocaeli City Hospital or who require perioperative endotracheal intubation will be included in our study.
  • Operations performed within the study time period will be taken
  • Patients whose anesthesiologists call for help for difficult airway will be included in the study.
  • Patients between the ages of 18-65 will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • 1. Expected difficult airway patients (mallampati 3-4) and other patients with high difficult airway scores will not be included in the study.
  • Patients with difficult airway conditions but who will be awakened by giving up endotracheal intubation will not be included in the study.

Treatment and study plan

Videolaryngoscopy

Procedure

Situations in which the practitioner performs endotracheal intubation using a videolaryngoscope during airway intervention will be included in this group.

FOB

Procedure

Situations in which the practitioner performs endotracheal intubation using a fiberoptic bronchoscope during airway intervention will be included in this group.

Other names: endotracheal intubation with fiberoptic bronchoscope

FOB+Aintree

Procedure

Situations in which the practitioner performs endotracheal intubation using a Fiberoptic intubation via LMA with aintree catheter during airway intervention will be included in this group.

Other names: Fiberoptic intubation via LMA with aintree catheter

Classic intubation with laryngoscopy

Procedure

Situations in which the practitioner performs endotracheal intubation using a macintosh laryngoscope during airway intervention will be included in this group.

Others

Procedure

Cases in which intubation cannot be performed, those who are awakened from anesthesia, or those in whom a surgical method is used for airway access will be included in this group.

Primary outcomes

  1. Successful endotracheal intubation rate in difficult airway

    Time frame: During the intraoperative period of difficult intubation case

    The primary outcome of our study is the rate( in percent) of complication-free and successful endotracheal intubation performed by specialists or the airway team in unexpected difficult airway cases.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The response time of the airway team to the case and the tools they used

    Time frame: During the intraoperative period of difficult intubation case

    In this section, the interventions performed by the airway team will be compared with the control group. The duration( time in minutes) of the intervention and the different airway tools used will be compared numerically.

  2. airway intervention equipment

    Time frame: During the intraoperative period of difficult intubation case

    To determine the most commonly used assistive devices (type) in airway intervention and to compare their frequencies ( in percent) in two different defined groups.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kocaeli City Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jun 7, 2024
Registry last updated
Oct 24, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.