GSK Investigational Site
Huntington Beach, California, 92647, United States
NCT Number: NCT01453023
This study will investigate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) 100/25mcg administered using the novel dry powder inhaler in children aged 5 to 11 years with persistent asthma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me5 year–11 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Huntington Beach, California, 92647, United States
This study will investigate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) 100/25mcg administered using the novel dry powder inhaler in children aged 5 to 11 years with persistent asthma. Fluticasone furoate (FF, GW685698) is a novel once daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and vilanterol (VI, GW642444) is an inhaled once daily long-acting beta2 agonist (LABA). FF/VI is a novel ICS/LABA combination with once-daily dosing being developed for the treatment of asthma in adults, adolescents, and children of 5 years and above.
This study will be a randomized, double-blind, repeat dose, two period crossover study, with FF as the control. During each of two treatment periods subjects will receive either FF/VI 100/25 micrograms (mcg) or FF 100 mcg daily on 14 consecutive mornings via the novel dry powder inhaler. Approximately 26 subjects will be recruited into this study, with a target of 20 completed subjects. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and glucose , potassium and cortisol levels will be investigated.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
100mcg delivered via a novel dry powder inhaler on days 1-14 of one study treatment period.
Other names: FF
100/25 mcg delivered via a novel dry powder inhaler on days 1-14 of one study treatment period.
Other names: FF/VI
Time frame: From the start of study medication until Week 11 (Visit 9)/Early Withdrawal
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised in deciding whether reporting is appropriate in other situations. Refer to the General Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, total neutrophils, platelets, and white blood cell (WBC) count at Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hemoglobin and MCHC at Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of reticulocytes and RBCs at Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of hematocrit at Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Hematocrit is a measure of the percentage of the volume of the whole blood that is composed of red blood cells, as determined by separation of red blood cells from the plasma (usually by centrifugation).
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of MCV at Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of MCH at Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of ALT, ALP, AST, and GGT at Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of albumin and total protein at Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of calcium, chloride, carbon dioxide content/bicarbonate (CO2/BI), glucose, potassium, sodium, and urea/BUN at Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood samples were collected for the measurement of total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, creatinine, and uric acid at Day 14 of the respective treatment period.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF is calculated as the maximum of three readings taken at each timepoint for each participant. Baseline is defined as the maximum pre-dose measurement at Day 1 for each period.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
SBP and DBP were measured at Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose measurement at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Day 14 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Heart rate (HR) was measured at Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period. hr=hour. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose measurement at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Day 14 value minus the Baseline value. Treatment, period, day (1 and 14), participant Baseline, period Baseline, and treatment*day interaction were fitted as fixed effects, and participant was fitted as a random effect.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
QTcF is the QT domain corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula. Treatment, period, day (1 and 14), participant Baseline, period Baseline, and treatment*day interaction were fitted as fixed effects, and participant was fitted as a random effect.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Area under the concentration-time (AUC) curve from time zero (pre-dose) to the last time AUC(0-t) and from time zero to 4 hours AUC(0-4) of quantifiable concentration of FF on Day 14 of the respective treatment period was measured. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the PK Population.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of FF on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
tmax is defined as the time to reach the observed maximum concentration, and tlast is defined as the time of the last observed quantifiable concentration on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Area under the concentration-time (AUC) curve from time zero (pre-dose) to the last time AUC(0-t) and from time zero to 4 hours AUC(0-4) of quantifiable concentration of VI on Day 14 of the respective treatment period was measured. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed reflects everyone in the VI PK Population.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of VI on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
tmax is defined as the time to reach the observed maximum VI concentration, and tlast is defined as the time of the last observed quantifiable VI concentration on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
Blood glucose and potassium values were measured on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. Samples were collected at the following times: pre-dose; 10 minutes (min) and 30 min post-dose; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose. Weighted means were derived using the linear trapezoidal rule. Actual relative times were used for the calculation except where actual times were missing. If any actual times were missing, planned relative time were used for these observations. Treatment and period were fitted as fixed effects and participant was fitted as a random effect.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
SC weighted mean was determined for each participant over the time period of 0-12 hours on Day 14 of the respective treatment period. SC weighted mean was derived by dividing the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; defined as thearea under the concentration-time curve from time zero up to 24 hours) by the sample collection time interval. The sample collection time interval is defined as the difference between the time of the last cortisol sample and the time of the first cortisol sample. Samples were collected at the following time points: 0 (first blood draw/pre-dose); 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours (relative to the "0" time point). Weighted means were derived using the linear trapezoidal rule. Actual relative times were used for the calculation except where actual times were missing. If any actual times were missing, planned relative time were used for these observations. Treatment and period were fitted as fixed effects and participant was fitted as a random effect.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day X)
During the pharyngometry assessment, participants inhaled through a wavetube, which had a mouthpiece with the same dimensions as the mouthpiece on the dry powder inhaler used for the study. This technique was used to measure the size of the throat and mouth (oropharynx) in the form of pharyngograms. Pharyngometry data were recorded for each day (Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period) using the mean of four measurements (pharyngograms), and the average oropharyngeal cross-sectional area was calculated.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
During the pharyngometry assessment, participants inhaled through a wavetube, which had a mouthpiece with the same dimensions as the mouthpiece on the dry powder inhaler used for this study. This technique was used to measure the size of the throat and mouth (oropharynx) in the form of pharyngograms. Distance of assessment is defined as the distance (length measured in centimeters [cm]) estimated to be from the lips to the larynx. Pharyngometry data were recorded for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period) using the mean of four measurements (pharyngograms), and the average oropharyngeal cross-sectional area was calculated.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
During the pharyngometry assessment, participants inhaled through a wavetube, which had a mouthpiece with the same dimensions as the mouthpiece on the dry powder inhaler used for this study. This technique was used to measure the size of the throat and mouth (oropharynx) in the form of pharyngograms. Oropharyngeal volume is defined as the volume (cm^3) of the mouth and throat estimated to be from the lips to the larynx. Pharyngometry data were recorded for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period) using the mean of four measurements (pharyngograms), and the average oropharyngeal cross-sectional area was calculated.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
During the inhalation profile assessment, participants inhaled through a mouthpiece from a device with a similar resistance to the dry powder inhaler used for this study. Average flow rate is defined as the average inspiratory flow rate (Liters [L]/min) across the inhalation profile when inhaling across the resistance of the inhaler. PIFR is defined as the Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate (L/min) of the inhalation profile when inhaling across the resistance of the inhaler.The pressure drop during the inhalation was measured, and the inhalation profiles (pressure drop versus time profile) of the participants were obtained. The mean of the two inhalation profile measurements was used for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period), and the average flow rate and PIFR were determined.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
During the inhalation profile assessment, participants inhaled through a mouthpiece from a device with a similar resistance to the dry powder inhaler used for this study. Inhalation time is defined as the duration of the inhalation(s) when inhaling across the resistance of the inhaler. The pressure drop during the inhalation was measured, and the inhalation profiles (pressure drop versus time profile) of the participants were obtained. The mean of the two inhalation profile measurements was used for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period), and the inhalation time was determined.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
During the inhalation profile assessment, participants inhaled through a mouthpiece from a device with a similar resistance to the dry powder inhaler used for this study. Inhaled volume is defined as the volume of air (Liters) inhaled during the inhalation across the resistance of the inhaler.
The pressure drop during the inhalation was measured, and the inhalation profiles (pressure drop versus time profile) of the participants were obtained. The mean of the two inhalation profile measurements was used for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period), and the inhalaled volume was determined.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
During the inhalation profile assessment, participants inhaled through a mouthpiece from a device with a similar resistance to the dry powder inhaler used for this study. Peak pressure drop is defined as the maximum pressure drop (kilopascal [kPa]) achieved during inhalation across the resistance of the inhaler. The pressure drop during the inhalation was measured, and the inhalation profiles (pressure drop versus time profile) of the participants were obtained. The mean of the two inhalation profile measurements was calculated for each day (Days 1 and 14 of the respective treatment period), and used for subsequent modeling and prediction of dose emission attributes.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
The total emitted dose (TED) is defined as the mass (micrograms) of the nominal dose that passes beyond the throat. The recorded inhalation profiles of the participants and the mouth-throat (oropharyngeal) models of the sizes that approximated to pharyngometry measurements of the participants were used in conjunction with the electronic Lung (eLung) for in vitro assessment. The eLung is a breathing simulator that replicates the selected inhalation profile with an active inhaler placed at the lips end of the selected ororpharyngeal model. After the dose is emitted from the inhaler, the analysis and assay of throat deposition and material passing beyond the throat was used to derive the nominal, minimum, and maximum predicted total emitted dose.
Time frame: Day 14 of the respective treatment period (up to Study Day 63)
The ex-throat dose (ETD) and the "nominal ETD" is the mass (micrograms) of active investigational material that passes beyond the throat, nominal being the mean. The recorded inhalation profiles of the participants and the mouth-throat (oropharyngeal) models of the sizes that approximated to pharyngometry measurements of the participants were used in conjunction with the electronic Lung (eLung) for in vitro assessment. The eLung is a breathing simulator that replicates the selected inhalation profile with an active inhaler placed at the lips end of the selected ororpharyngeal model. After the dose is emitted from the inhaler, the analysis and assay of throat deposition and material passing beyond the throat was used to derive the nominal, minimum, and maximum predicted ETD and ETD <2 microns.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A Randomized, Double-blind, Repeat Dose, Two Period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol 100/25 Micrograms in Children Aged 5 to 11 Years With Persistent Asthma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07394127
Asthma, Asthma Chronic
Gümüşhane, Trabzon, Ordu, Giresun, Rize, Artvin, Gümüşhane, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT01678222
Allergic Inflammation, Asthma
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03937804
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03927820
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details