Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01230099

Informing Decisions in Chronic Critical Illness: A Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

The purpose of this study is to test a communication intervention to support family decision-making for patients with chronic critical illness.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Increasing use of intensive care therapies by an aging population has created a new medical syndrome - "chronic critical illness" - encompassing multi-system derangements, recurrent complications, and protracted/permanent dependence on mechanical ventilation and other life-supports. Numbering >100,000 at any point in time, the chronically critically ill are a growing population of older adults and a serious national health problem. Annual expenditures for these patients are estimated at $24 billion, mostly for patients ≥ 65 years old. Yet 6-month mortality rates exceed those for most malignancies, impairments are severe among survivors, and return to the community is rare. Descriptive research has identified domains of information that are important for decision-making by patients/families about continuation of treatment in the chronic phase of critical illness, but has also revealed that decisions are often made without this information or patient goals of care as a context. In acute critical illness, scheduled, structured meetings and printed informational aids are effective for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) families, but no study has tested an intervention to inform and support decision-making about chronic critical illness. This study is a randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical trial of such an intervention. Specific Aims are: (1) To evaluate the impact on family- and patient-focused outcomes of a proactive program of protocolized, interdisciplinary, informational support meetings led by a palliative care physician, plus a printed informational aid, for families of chronically critically ill patients; and (2) To evaluate the impact of this intervention on utilization of critical care resources for the chronically critically ill. We hypothesize that as compared to usual care plus the printed aid, this intervention will effectively inform decision-making, improve family well-being, promote discussion of preferences for patient goals of care, and optimize critical care resource utilization, without increasing patient mortality.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mechanically ventilated ≥ 7 days
  • Mechanically ventilated without > 96 hour interruption
  • Age ≥ 21 years
  • ICU MD does not expect patient will die within 72 hours
  • ICU MD does not expect patient will be liberated from the ventilator within 72 hours.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous admission to study ICU this hospitalization Mechanically ventilated at outside hospital for > 7 days before transfer
  • Chronic Neuromuscular (NM) Disease
  • Trauma
  • Burn
  • Previous palliative care consultation in this hospitalization
  • No family or other surrogate decision-maker
  • Family not available
  • Surrogate lacks English proficiency
  • Physician refused permission for research staff to approach the family

Treatment and study plan

Supportive Information Team Group

Behavioral

A minimum of two protocolized, interdisciplinary, informational support meetings led by palliative care clinicians will be arranged with family members or other patient surrogates who participate in decision-making for individual chronically critically ill patients.

Other names: SIT

Primary outcomes

  1. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Time frame: Day 90

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Time frame: Day 18-20

  2. Impact of Events Scale-Revised

    Time frame: Day 90

  3. Discussion of Preferences for Patients Goals of Care

    Time frame: Day 18-20

    Subscale of Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research Toolkit

  4. Quality of Communication

    Time frame: Day 18-20

    Curtis Measure

  5. Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Survey

    Time frame: Day 90

  6. Modified Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research (CHCR) Tool

    Time frame: Day 90

  7. Limitation of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Therapy

    Time frame: Average of 60 days

    Percent of patients with mechanical ventilation, renal replacement, vasopressors, or artificial nutrition withheld or withdrawn

  8. Hospital Length of Stay

    Time frame: Average of 60 days

    Days since randomization

  9. Mortality

    Time frame: Day 90

  10. Physician-Surrogate Discordance Score

    Time frame: day 18-20

  11. Discussion of Preferences for Patients Goals of Care

    Time frame: Day 90

    Subscale of Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research Toolkit

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Other

Collaborators

  • Duke University
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
  • University of North Carolina

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Oct 28, 2010
Registry last updated
Oct 29, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.