Nivolumab and Entinostat
DrugPatients entering phase I will receive one week entinostat without nivolumab (priming phase) before receiving the combination treatment of nivolumab and entinostat.
Other names: Opdivo
NCT Number: NCT03838042
The aim of this trial is to determine preliminary activity of the combination treatment with nivolumab and entinostat in children and adolescents with high risk refractory/relapsed/progressive tumors harboring a high mutational load, focal MYC(N) amplification or ATRT-MYC subgroup as well as tumors with high tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or a tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS).
Interested in participating?
Request Info2 year–21 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
Compared to adult cancers, most pediatric cancers carry a relatively low mutational burden. HDAC inhibition (HDACi) modifies T-cell regulation and can augment response to checkpoint inhibition by reducing the number of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and creating an immunogenic tumor microenvironment including induction of MHCI and neo-antigens. In vitro and in vivo models showed enhanced anti-tumor activity of the combination of checkpoint inhibition and HDACi compared to either agent alone. This provides a strong rationale to combine these drug classes. Checkpoint inhibition results in activation of tumor-associated T cells. It is now becoming increasingly evident that patients with tumors with a high number of tumor infiltrating T cells at baseline show an increased response rate. Additionally, recent clinical data on immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for melanoma patients detected tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) as indicators of an activated adaptive immune response. Their presence has been linked to objective treatment responses in patients with different cancer entities receiving ICI.
Furthermore, MYC- or NMYC-driven (referred to as MYC(N)) malignancies like very high-risk medulloblastomas or very high-risk neuroblastomas still have a dismal outcome. MYC is not only reported to upregulate PD-L1 and thereby a possible biomarker for checkpoint inhibition but also very compelling recent preclinical data strongly suggests that HDAC inhibitors are active against MYC amplified medulloblastoma in vitro and in vivo. In NMYC amplified neuroblastoma cell lines similar observations were made in vitro. In addition, it has been shown recently that the molecular MYC subgroup of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) exhibit a strong T-cell infiltrate in contrast to the SHH-ATRT subtype and are considered immunological "hot" tumors. Taken together, our results suggest that MYC(N)-driven tumors depend on HDAC and we hypothesize that MYC(N) status can serve as a biomarker for response prediction to a combinatorial treatment of checkpoint inhibition and HDAC inhibition.
Pediatric patients aged 2-21 years with refractory/relapsed/progressive high-risk malignancies with a high mutational load (group A), with MYC(N) amplification or from the ATRT-MYC subgroup (group C) as well as patients with high TILs and/or TLS positive (group E) are eligible for this trial. Phase I determines the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the combination of the HDACi entinostat and the checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab for the age groups 6-11 and 12-21 years, respectively. Phase II investigates activity in 3 groups A, C, E for patients in the two age cohorts 2-11 and 12-21 years. The duration of treatment is 12 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days), preceded by 1 priming week.
In addition, a comprehensive accompanying research program investigates PD biomarkers for immune checkpoint and HDAC inhibition.
Clinical trials investigating the combination of nivolumab and entinostat in children have not been reported so far.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients entering phase I will receive one week entinostat without nivolumab (priming phase) before receiving the combination treatment of nivolumab and entinostat.
Other names: Opdivo
Time frame: 5 weeks
A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as any AE according to the definitions and exceptions listed below that is related to the administration of the combination of investigational agents occurring during the priming week and first cycle of combination treatment (first 5 weeks) in phase I of the trial.
A study participant will be considered evaluable for a DLT if at least 2 doses of nivolumab and 4 doses of entinostat were administered during the first 5 weeks (5 weeks normally incorporate the priming week and 1 cycle of planned combination treatment). Participants who discontinue treatment or have treatment delays preventing them from receiving the above defined minimal amount of treatment in the first cycle of combination treatment for reasons unrelated to study drug toxicity, are not evaluable for DLT and will be replaced in enrollment (maximum number of replacement subjects will be 3 per dose level).
Time frame: Change in 24 weeks
Best response (CR or PR) will be based on RANO criteria for all primary CNS tumors and RECIST for non-CNS tumors, defined for each patient as the best response under study combination therapy during the first 6 cycles (assessment every 2 cycles).
Calcified or intra-osseous (osteo)sarcoma target lesions which were progressive before initiation of treatment and show SD on response evaluation (confirmation through a subsequent scan at least 4 weeks later) will be considered as a responder.
Time frame: Phase II: maximum of 48 weeks
DOR will be evaluated for all patients who experienced (confirmed) response. Starting time point will be the time when best response was determined.
Time frame: Phase II: maximum of 48 weeks
DCR will be evaluated in addition, also using iRECIST and iRANO.
Time frame: Phase II: maximum of 12 cycles (each cycle is 28 days)
SD will be evaluated in addition, also using iRECIST and iRANO.
Time frame: 4 years
The event-time endpoint PFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, considering all the patients who started the treatment, whatever their compliance to treatment, including if the treatment was stopped prematurely for a reason other than disease progression. 95%-Confidence intervals will be provided for the Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Phase II: maximum of 12 cycles (each cycle is 28 days)
The event-time endpoint TTR will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, considering all the patients who started the treatment, whatever their compliance to treatment, including if the treatment was stopped prematurely for a reason other than disease progression. 95%-Confidence intervals will be provided for the Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Phase II: maximum of 48 weeks
The event-time endpoint OS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, considering all the patients who started the treatment, whatever their compliance to treatment, including if the treatment was stopped prematurely for a reason other than disease progression. 95%-Confidence intervals will be provided for the Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Time frame: Phase II: maximum of 48 weeks
As a secondary endpoint for patients who continued treatment beyond progression in case of clinical benefit, response as assessed by iRECIST or iRANO will be performed.
Time frame: one week
Time to reach the maximum concentration (hr).
Time frame: one week
The peak plasma concentration of a drug after Administration (ng/mL)
Time frame: one week
The time required for the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value (hr)
Time frame: one week
The integral of the concentration-time curve (ng/mL·hr)
Time frame: one week
The total body clearance will be equal to the renal clearance + hepatic clearance + lung clearance (L/h/m²)
Time frame: At baseline and every odd cycle (Cycle 3 - 12) and every third cycle (Cycle 13 - 24) (each cycle is 28 days).
Assessment of circulating Tumor DNA in peripheral blood.
Time frame: 4 years
Response prediction in a co-clinical PDX model and drug testing program
Time frame: At baseline, after the priming week and after 5 weeks of initiation of therapy
Immune phenotyping (FACS Panel) and Luminex cytokine panel in peripheral blood.
Time frame: 4 years
Analyze mRNA Expression data for Tumor infiltrating immune cell populations
Time frame: 4 years
Analyze gene signature in whole exome data
Time frame: At baseline, after priming week and after 5 weeks of initiation of therapy
Test induction of cryptic transcription start sites
Time frame: 4 years
Determination of SNV load by different methods (WES, Panel-Seq)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Melanie Heiß
CONTACT
Venukah Schäfer
CONTACT
University Hospital Heidelberg
Other
INFORM2 Exploratory Multinational Phase I/II Combination Study of Nivolumab and Entinostat in Children and Adolescents With Refractory High-risk Malignancies (INFORM2-NivEnt)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05480904
ALL, Adult, CNS Tumor
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04706676
Behavior, CNS Tumor
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06840886
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Beverly Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04732065
Astrocytoma, CNS Tumor
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details