Center for Sensory Motor Interaction, Aalborg University
Aalborg East, 9220, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT02808611
An extensive amount of studies indicate that conditioned pain modulation (CPM) test paradigms can be of use to evaluate the efficacy of the endogenous pain inhibition pathway in healthy controls and pain patients. A number of studies indicate that the autonomic nervous system (ANS) responds to painful stimulation by parasympathetic activity withdrawal and up-regulation of sympathetic activity (flight-or-fight mode), but it remains unknown whether these responses predict individual pain susceptibility or CPM efficacy and whether different pain modalities evoke different physiological stress responses, i.e. do individuals with low pain tolerance exhibit more vigorous ANS responses when subjected to controlled acute pain stimuli, and do high ANS responsiveness to pain coincide with altered psychophysical pain levels/CPM efficacy.
This study aims to investigate the effect of ANS responsiveness on CPM paradigms and to investigate if an exogenous, pharmaceutically induced decrease in the sympathetic drive of the ANS will yield decreased CPM efficacy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Aalborg East, 9220, Denmark
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Reduction of the ANS response
Time frame: 1-2 hours after propranolol/placebo and after 10 minutes break.
A test stimuli will be applied and compared with a test stimuli simultaneous a condition stimuli.
Time frame: 1-2 hours after propranolol/placebo and after 10 minutes break.
10 stimuli will be applied and subjects will back asked to rate the pain for each individual stimuli.
Time frame: 1-2 hours after propranolol/placebo and after 10 minutes break.
Two-point Heart-rate variability recording will be conducted using the Polar RS800CX heart rate monitor.
Time frame: 1-2 hours after propranolol/placebo and after 10 minutes break.
Temperatures ranging from 45-48°C will be applied to the forearm in three phases (phase 1: 5 seconds, phase 2: 5 seconds, and phase 3: 20 seconds). The subjects will be asked to assess the pain of the thermal stimuli using the electronic VAS scale.
Kristian Kjær Petersen
Other
Konditionerende Smertestimuli - Sammenligning af Forskellige Test og Konditioneringsmodaliteter
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07470125
Healthy Subjects
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT06818032
Healthy, Healthy Adult
Burlington, Vermont, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00761631
Healthy Subjects
Benton, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02610465
Cardiac-Related Conditions, Healthy Subjects
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details