Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03648151

Influence of PET/CT Radiomic Features on the Outcome of Lung Cancer Patients

Radiomics is an attractive field in objectively quantifying image features, and may overcome the subjectivity of visually interpreting computed tomography (CT), or positron emission tomography (PET). It is reported that the features related to treatment response, outcomes, tumor staging, tissue identification, and cancer genetics. Therefore, the investigators try to explore the key features for the outcome of lung cancer patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Radiomic Features:

PET/CT images, including other kinds of CT serials, were transported into a personal computer. Using the open source software of 3D-Slicer, volumes of interest (VOIs) for primary tumor, or even lymph nodes, was semi-automatically or manually segmented. And then, radiomic features were extracted.

PET Parameters:

Using combined CT VOIs, corresponding PET standard uptake value (SUV, no unit) were measured. For a foci (either tumor, or lymph node), mean, sum and maximum SUV were documented, and were used for training and validating models alongside radiomic features.

Feature Selection:

Data were analyzed by deep learning or random forests method, and top 20 variables were scored by their contribution to the regression (variable importance, VIMP). The generalized features were identified as the same ones between two kinds of image serials (for example, ordinary and thin-section CT, or PET and CT). Additionally, when three or more features met the criterion, a lower value of Akaike information criterion (AIC) which measures the relative quality of statistical models was used to find appropriate features with lower overfitting possibility.

Model Validation:

The developed model was validated internally and externally. The internal indices for independent continuous variable were accuracy (bias and absolute bias) and precision (correlation coefficient and R square), and that for independent classified or survival variable was c-index. The patients enrolled from another medical center were used for external validation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pathologically diagnosed as lung caner.
  • Accepted PET/CT scans at the hospitals either affiliated to Shanxi Medical University or Anhui Medical University
  • Both PET and CT serials can be obtained
  • Can be followed for treatment modalities (including chemotherapy regimens, radiotherapy dose, and et al), survival time and status, and other related information.

Exclusion criteria

  • Simultaneously suffering from the cancers from other tissues and organs
  • Have a history of diabetes, chronic heart diseases, or chronic renal failure

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (OS) of lung cancer patients

    Time frame: The patients were followed to December 31, 2019

    The time from the scan date to death for any reason

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

Other

Collaborators

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Aug 27, 2018
Registry last updated
Jul 23, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.