Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04200677

Influence of Electrode Positioning and Current Type on Fatigue, Force and Discomfort

Introduction: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has the purpose of generating muscle contractions to minimize muscular atrophy and to improve neuromuscular performance. NMES has been performed using monophasic or biphasic currents, applied over a nerve trunk or muscle belly, and both can generate contractions by the peripheral and central nervous system. Pulse width (wide or narrow) is an essential parameter for NMES. Although NMES studies using wide pulses have been performed with monophasic currents, it is known that this current induces discomfort during NMES. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze if biphasic currents have the same effect as monophasic currents using the same parameters.

Objectives:

To compare the effects of NMES with narrow and wide pulse widths associated with monophasic and biphasic currents, applied over a tibial nerve and triceps surae muscles in healthy individuals in terms of muscle fatigue, central and peripheral contribution, voluntary and evoked force and sensory discomfort.

Methods:

A crossover, experimental controlled and randomized study will be developed with healthy male and female (age: 18-45 years). The following dependent variables will be: amplitude of H-reflex and M-wave (single and double pulses), voluntary and evoked triceps surae muscles torque, fatigability (force time integral), perceived discomfort and neuromuscular adaptations. The independent variables will be related to current phase, pulse width and location of electrical stimulation electrodes. There will be a familiarization session followed by 9 sessions with 7 rest days between them (10 weeks). Data will be reported as mean and standard deviation (± SD). Parametric tests will be used for the normally distributed data (Shapiro-Wilk test) that show homogeneous variations (Levene test). A repeated measure mixed-model ANOVA will be performed and, in the case of major effects or significant interactions, the Tukey post-hoc test will be applied. In addition, the power and size of the effect (reported as partial eta square, partial η2) will be calculated. The significance threshold will be set at p <0.05 for all procedures.

Expected results: Biphasic currents will be more comfortable and will generate less muscle fatigue when compared to monophasic currents. There will be less fatigue and greater central contribution when wider pulse currents will be applied over a nerve trunk concerning the application with a wide pulse over a muscle belly.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Electrical Stimulation

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Faculty of Physical Education, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a randomized controlled trial, a crossover study, with healthy male and female participants. The procedures will take place in 10 distinct visits for a 7-day interval.

The following visit in the lab will be:

  • Familiarization session.
  • Monophasic Current (100 Hz) with 1ms pulse width applied to the Tibial Nerve;
  • Biphasic current (100 Hz) with pulse width 0.5ms applied to the Tibial Nerve;
  • Biphasic current (100 Hz) with 1ms pulse width applied to the Tibial Nerve;
  • Biphasic current (100 Hz) with 2ms pulse width applied to the Tibial Nerve;
  • Monophasic (100 Hz) with 1ms pulse width applied to the Triceps Surae Muscle Belly;
  • Biphasic current (100 Hz) with pulse width 0.5ms applied to the Triceps Surae muscle Belly;
  • Biphasic current (100 Hz) with 1ms pulse width applied to the Triceps Surae Muscle Belly;
  • Biphasic current (100 Hz) with 2ms pulse width applied to the Triceps Surae Muscle Belly;
  • Biphasic current (25 Hz) with 0.5ms pulse width applied to the Triceps Surae Muscle Belly.

The dependent variables will be:

  • Muscle fatigability;
  • Central and peripheral contribution (with H-reflex and M-wave amplitude analysis);
  • Maximum voluntary isometric contraction;
  • Force production for plantar flexion evoked by NMES;
  • Perceived discomfort.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Classified as physically active according to the INTERNATIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY;
  • To practice only recreational physical activity;
  • Be at least 3 months without practicing strength training.

Exclusion criteria

  • Present some type of skeletal muscle dysfunction that may interfere with the tests;
  • NMES intolerance in the triceps surae muscle belly or tibial nerve;
  • Use of analgesics, antidepressants, tranquilizers or other centrally acting agents;
  • Cardiovascular or peripheral vascular problems, chronic diseases, neurological or muscular disorders that may hinder the complete execution of the study design by the volunteer.

Treatment and study plan

Monophasic Current (100 Hz) with 1ms pulse width applied to the Tibial Nerve

Other

The participants will perform 36 contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with the following NMES parameters: (Monophasic Current, 100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s)

Biphasic current (100 Hz) with pulse width 0.5ms applied to the Tibial Nerve

Other

The participants will perform 36 contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with the following current parameters: (Biphasic current, 100 Hz, pulse duration 0.5 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s)

Biphasic current (100 Hz) with 1ms pulse width applied to the Tibial Nerve

Other

The participants will perform 36 contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with the following current parameters: (Biphasic current, 100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s)

Biphasic current (100 Hz) with 2ms pulse width applied to the Tibial Nerve

Other

The participants will perform 36 contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with the following current parameters: (Biphasic current, 100 Hz, pulse duration 2 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s)

Monophasic current (100 Hz) with 1ms pulse width applied to the Triceps Surae Muscle Belly

Other

The participants will perform 36 contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with the following current parameters: (Monophasic current, 100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s)

Biphasic current (100 Hz) with pulse width 0.5ms applied to the Triceps Surae muscle Belly

Other

The participants will perform 36 contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with the following current parameters: (Biphasic current, 100 Hz, pulse duration 0.5 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s)

Biphasic current (100 Hz) with 1ms pulse width applied to the Triceps Surae Muscle Belly

Other

The participants will perform 36 contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with the following current parameters: (Biphasic current , 100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s)

Biphasic current (100 Hz) with 2ms pulse width applied to the Triceps Surae Muscle Belly

Other

The participants will perform 36 contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with the following current parameters: (Biphasic current , 100 Hz, pulse duration 2 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s)

Biphasic current (25 Hz) with 0.5ms pulse width applied to the Triceps Surae Muscle Belly

Other

The participants will perform 36 contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation with the following current parameters: (Biphasic current, 25 Hz, pulse duration 0.5 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s)

Primary outcomes

  1. Muscle Fatigue

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of thirty-six contractions evoked by electrical stimulation (1 per week, total of 9 sessions). This outcome will be measured up to 9 weeks. Data will be reported through study completion (4 years).

    Muscle Fatigue will be assessed by Force time integral (area under the force trace), after neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocol.

  2. Muscle Force

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of thirty-six contractions evoked by electrical stimulation (1 per week, total of 9 sessions). This outcome will be measured up to 9 weeks. Data will be reported through study completion (4 years).

    Muscle force will be assessed by muscle force changes, based on the torque generated pre and post neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocol.

  3. Change from Baseline Central contribution (H reflex amplitude) after 15 minutes session of NMES

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of thirty-six contractions evoked by electrical stimulation (1 per week, total of 9 sessions). This outcome will be measured up to 9 weeks. Data will be reported through study completion (4 years).

    Central contribution will be measured before and after 15 minutes (36 contractions) of electrical stimulation in the session.

  4. Change from Baseline Peripheral contribution (M wave amplitude) after 15 minutes session of NMES

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of thirty-six contractions evoked by electrical stimulation (1 per week, total of 9 sessions). This outcome will be measured up to 9 weeks. Data will be reported through study completion (4 years).

    Peripheral contribution will be measured before and after acute session 15 minutes (36 contractions) of electrical stimulation in the session.

  5. Change from Baseline Evoked Torque after 15 minutes session of electrical stimulation

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of thirty-six contractions evoked by electrical stimulation (1 per week, total of 9 sessions). This outcome will be measured up to 9 weeks. Data will be reported through study completion (4 years).

    Evoked Torque will be measured before and after acute session 15 minutes (36 contractions) of electrical stimulation in the session.

  6. Discomfort

    Time frame: At the beginning, middle and end of thirty-six contractions evoked by electrical stimulation (1 per week, total of 9 sessions). This outcome will be measured up to 9 weeks. Data will be reported through study completion (4 years).

    Discomfort sensory will be evaluated by Visual Analogic Scale during and after the evoked torque measurement with NMES. The Visual Analogic Scale assess pain by rating the subjective perceived discomfort of the subject from 0 (no perceived discomfort) to 10 (the most perceived discomfort)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Brasilia

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Influence of Electrode Positioning and Current Type on Muscle Fatigability, Force Generation, Perceived Discomfort and Neuromuscular Adaptations Induced by Neuromuscular Electric Stimulation: Implications on Rehabilitation

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 16, 2019
Registry last updated
May 24, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.