Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00494832

Influence of Dexmedetomidine on the Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery

The purposes of this study are:

1. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct for anesthesia during spine surgery and 2. To investigate the influence of Dexmedetomidine on the evoked potentials.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Use of evoked potentials can significantly improve neurologic outcome after major spine surgery. Modalities of evoked potentials commonly used are Somato-Sensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP's), Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP's), and Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP's).

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an alpha-2 agonist and has been FDA approved as an adjunct sedative agent to general anesthesia. It has been purported to reduce the amount of anesthetic required and potentiate the analgesic effect of opiates. In addition, DEX was shown to have minimal effect on SSEP's and VEP's in both rats and humans. Any decrease in the dose of general anesthesia that improves the monitoring of evoked potentials, supports DEX as an adjunct.

It is known that all anesthetic agents can interfere with the recording of evoked potentials. The choice of anesthetic however, depends on the modality of neurophysiologic monitoring planned for the patient. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and Sevoflurane, a low dose inhalational anesthetic are the usual agents for spine surgery. Both have a dose-related depressant effect on the quality of evoked potentials. As a result, it is common practice for the anesthesiologist to adjust the depth of anesthesia to improve signaling. The use of either anesthetic must accompany continuous infusion of Propofol and an opioid, Remifentanil or Fentanyl. The anesthesiologist then decides whether DEX should be as an adjunct. In our experience, DEX did not impair evoked potentials. In fact, it improved the quality of signals in a few patients. Yet, there are no published data of such effects in medical literature.

We hypothesize that Dexmedetomidine will not influence evoked potentials when used as an adjunct to general anesthesia. Our study is prospective, randomized, double-blinded and will be carried out on a set of anesthetics. We will first evaluate DEX as an adjunct in TIVA, then as an adjunct to Sevoflurane. The probable benefit of DEX may avoid the use of potent inhaled anesthetics which would improve VEP's monitoring. Quality recording of evoked potentials can enhance our ability to detect iatrogenic injury to the spinal cord and vision.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult spine surgery patients requiring evoked potentials monitoring.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age younger than 18 and older than 80 years
  • Patients with moderate neurological deficit
  • ASA grade above 3
  • Any chronic psychiatric disorder
  • Body mass index (BMI) above 35
  • Patients with cortical blindness, cataracts, retinal or optic neuropathy, glaucoma, untreated diabetes, active hepatitis, active coronary artery disease, untreated arrhythmias and patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency

Treatment and study plan

Dexmedetomidine

Drug

10 minutes loading dose of 0.9 mcg/kg

Maintenance dose of 0.6 mcg/kg/hour

Other names: Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride

normal saline

Drug

10 minutes loading dose of 0.9 mcg/kg

Maintenance dose of 0.6 mcg/kg/hour

Other names: 0.9% Sodium Chloride

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in evoked potentials

    Time frame: Duration of surgery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Washington

Other

Collaborators

  • Hospira, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Jul 2, 2007
Registry last updated
Sep 14, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.