Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04499612

Influence of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices on the Hemostatic System

The hemostasis system is one of the many biological systems of the human body, designed to preserve the liquid state of blood and prevent its loss during vascular injuries. The ideal balance between its coagulant and anticoagulant components never occurs. In various diseases and pathological conditions, the balance of the hemostasis system may be disturbed. Shifts towards hypercoagulability lead to the development of hemorrhagic complications, opposite shifts lead to the development of thrombotic complications.

Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are not rare and unique, today doctors meet with them every day. Its more than 1.5 million CIED's implanted every year.

Before surgery these patients are standard cardiology department patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), which develops due to the presence of arrhythmias, coronary heart disease, hypertension, congenital heart disease, myocardial infarction, myocarditis or other diseases and conditions. CHF is the most common, severe and unfavorable prognostic complication of these diseases. With CHF, the balance of the hemostasis system shifts towards hypercoagulation. Patients with CHF have an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, numerous brady- and tachyarrhythmias and other complications.

After CIED implantation, bradyarrhythmia is eliminated, as one of the parts in the pathogenesis of CHF. Patients, especially those with severe symptoms, improve their condition in the early postoperative period. In the long-term period, pacing, on the contrary, may contribute to the progression of CHF. The wrong choice of pacing mode or the place of electrode implantation can lead to desynchronization of the heart chambers, myocardial remodeling and left ventricular dysfunction.

Uncertainty is also observed in relation to the hemostasis system after CIED implantation. On the one hand, correction of bradyarrhythmia and CHF should provide patients with a shift towards hypocoagulability by normalizing the heart rate. On the other hand, trauma to the vessel wall during surgery, further placement of the CIED leads in the vessels, and perioperative stress can lead to even greater shifts towards hypercoagulation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Thromboembolism Arrhythmias, Cardiac Atrial Fibrillation Cardiac Event Cardiovascular Diseases Embolism and Thrombosis Heart Diseases Hematologic Diseases Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases Hemorrhagic Disorders Hemostatic Disorder Hemostatic Disorders Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Vascular Diseases

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Ryazan State Medical University

Ryazan, Ryazan Oblast, Russia

About this study

250 patients of similar age, gender, and ethnicity will be divided into five groups: Group A1-3: 150 patients with indications for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation; Group B: 50 patients with an CIED implanted 8-10 years ago; Group C: 50 patients with diseases similar to group A, but without indications for CIED implantation; Patients will be followed up for 2 years. Patients of group A1-3 will be taken peripheral venous blood to assess the studied parameters of hemostasis (platelet count, plateletcrit, mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, von Willebrand factor, P-selectin, coagulation factor I (FI), coagulation factor II (FII), coagulation factor V (FV), coagulation factor VII (FVII), coagulation factor X (FX), coagulation factor VIII (FVIII), coagulation factor IX (FIX), coagulation factor XI (FXI), coagulation factor XII (FXII), plasminogen, soluble fibrin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), D-dimer, antithrombin III, protein C) and duplex ultrasound of the vessels of the upper and lower extremities before the operation, after 7 days, 1 and 12 months after the operation. Similar procedures will be performed for patients of groups B and C only when included in the study. Echocardiography will be performed on all patients at enrollment, after 12 and 24 months of follow-up.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • for group A1-3: atrioventricular block/sick sinus syndrome/atrial fibrillation with impaired conduction as indications for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation;
  • for group B: atrioventricular block/sick sinus syndrome/atrial fibrillation with impaired conduction and cardiac implantable electronic device implanted 6-12 years ago;
  • for group C: atrioventricular block/sick sinus syndrome/atrial fibrillation with impaired conduction without indications for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

Exclusion criteria

  • active cancer or a remission period of less than 5 years;
  • decompensated somatic pathology;
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding in women.

Treatment and study plan

Cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

Procedure

Patients who have indications will receive cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

Cardiac implantable electronic device replace.

Procedure

Patients who have indications will receive cardiac implantable electronic device replace.

Duplex ultrasound.

Diagnostic Test

Patients will undergo ultrasound examination of the vessels of the upper and lower extremities.

Echocardiography.

Diagnostic Test

Patients will undergo an ultrasound examination of the heart.

Blood sampling.

Diagnostic Test

Patients will be taken venous blood to determine the studied markers of hemostasis system.

Primary outcomes

  1. Development of thromboembolism: venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, arterial thrombosis, arterial thromboembolism, transient ischemic attack, stroke.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after enrollment (according to the study design).

    Development of thromboembolic complications after the cardiac implantable electronic device implantation/replace or thromboembolism in conservative group patients during observation period.

  2. Development of cardiovascular event: myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, atrial fibrillation, decompensation of chronic heart failure.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after enrollment (according to the study design).

    Development of cardiovascular events after the cardiac implantable electronic device implantation/replace or in conservative group patients during observation period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hemostasis system markers deviations.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after enrollment (according to the study design).

    Deviation of investigated markers of the hemostasis system from normal values.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ryazan State Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of the Hemostatic System, Thromboembolic Complications and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Aug 5, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 18, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.