Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05150730

Individuals With Chronic Work-related Musculoskeletal Disease a Multidisciplinary Care Program

Rehabilitation for work-related musculoskeletal disorders involves physical, behavioral, psychological treatment and counseling on how to deal with pain and disability. The study aims to evaluate the profile and indicators on the perception of health, pain intensity, and work ability (WA) of disability with work-related chronic musculoskeletal disease, assisted in a multidisciplinary program of worker health care.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rosimeire Simprini Padula

São Paulo, 12942770, Brazil

About this study

The study design is an intervention pre and post, 88 individuals diagnosed with work-related musculoskeletal disorders were followed up during a multidisciplinary program at the Reference Center for Workers' Health of the Unified Health System (SUS), SP, Brazil. The study was carried out six groups of individuals were followed (16 to 21 meetings; 10 to 19 participants). Sociodemographic, occupational, general health, pain intensity, and work ability (WA) were assessed at the baseline. Participants included has work-related musculoskeletal disorders diagnosis and complaints of chronic pain in one or more regions of the body, of different age groups, education levels, income, and occupational status (unemployed, leave work, or is working). Chronic pain is defined as a persistent or recurrent symptom lasting longer than three months. Criteria whose main diagnosis was a work-related mental disorder or musculoskeletal complaints related to previous injuries resulting from an accident or typical displacement from work, such as amputations and fractures, were excluded.

Outcome measure

  • Pain complains - Body region The diagnoses of musculoskeletal diseases were grouped by body segments: cervical spine, lumbar spine, upper limbs and lower limbs. Pain complaints reported by individuals were also grouped by segments: cervical, lumbar, more than one spinal segment, upper limbs, lower limbs, two areas of the body, three or more body region.
  • Pain intensity To measure pain intensity, the Numerical Rating Scale was used, an instrument that presents itself as a numbered line from zero (no pain) to ten points (maximum pain). Individuals responded about pain in the last seven days and in the last month.
  • Work ability - using two questions (current and future work ability). Based on the Work Ability Index (WA) have been inserted into this script questions about health perception, current and future WA (two years from now).
  • Emotional State
  • Job Satisfaction

Two questions were also added to assess emotional state and job satisfaction. A Likert scale from 0 to 10 was used to answer all questions, and for the perception of health, current WA, future WA, and emotional state, the extremes represented respectively "very bad" and "great", and for satisfaction, 0 meant "totally dissatisfied" and 10 "totally satisfied".

  • Work demand The work demand was also evaluated based on the individual's perception of their work, in which they could refer to a greater physical or mental demand or the perception that their work involved both physical and mental demand, without any predominance.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants included has work-related musculoskeletal disorders diagnosis and complaints of chronic pain in one or more regions of the body, of different age groups, education levels, income, and occupational status (unemployed, leave work, or is working). Chronic pain is defined as a persistent or recurrent symptom lasting longer than three months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants whose main diagnosis was a work-related mental disorder or musculoskeletal complaints related to previous injuries resulting from an accident or typical displacement from work, such as amputations and fractures, were excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Multi professional care

Other

Participants were instructed to respect their pain threshold during body practice and the evolution of the participants happened gradually and individually. Associated with the practice of exercise, workers received information about their disease, chronic pain, guidelines for daily activities, and the importance of physical exercise. In the second hour, the responsible psychologist addressed issues such as the repercussions of illnesses on the individual's social and affective life, self-esteem, self-image, conformism, and self-indulgence after the illness and prospects for the future. Throughout the program, participants also received informative lectures from other professionals, such as social workers, nurses, and dentists.

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency of Musculoskeletal complains

    Time frame: baseline, and through study completion, 1 year (12 months).

    Body region - The complaints reported by the individuals were also grouped by regions: cervical, lumbar spine, more than one segment of the spine, upper limbs, lower limbs, two body region, and three or more regions.

  2. Values of Pain intensity

    Time frame: baseline, and at study completion, 1 year (12 months).

    Numeric Rating Scale - is a line numbered from zero (no pain) to ten points (maximum) pain). Individuals responded about pain in the last seven days and in the last month.

  3. Values of Self-perceived Health

    Time frame: baseline, at study completion, 1 year (12 months).

    A Likert scale from 0 ("very bad") to 10 ("great")

  4. Values of Work ability - current and future

    Time frame: baseline, and at study completion, 1 year (12 months).

    A Likert scale from 0 ("very bad") to 10 ("great")

  5. Values of Emotional status

    Time frame: baseline, and at study completion, 1 year (12months).

    A Likert scale from 0 ("very bad") to 10 ("great")

  6. Values of Job satisfaction

    Time frame: baseline, and at study completion, 1 year (12 months).

    A Likert scale from 0 totally unsatisfied" to 10 "totally satisfied".

  7. Values of Pain intensity

    Time frame: baseline, and two months at the end of intervention (14 months) .

    Numeric Rating Scale - is a line numbered from zero (no pain) to ten points (maximum) pain). Individuals responded about pain in the last seven days and in the last month.

  8. Values of Self-perceived Health

    Time frame: baseline, and two months at the end of intervention (14 months).

    A Likert scale from 0 ("very bad") to 10 ("great")

  9. Values of Work ability - current and future

    Time frame: baseline, and two months at the end of intervention (14 months).

    A Likert scale from 0 ("very bad") to 10 ("great")

  10. Values of Emotional status

    Time frame: baseline, and two months at the end of intervention (14 months).

    A Likert scale from 0 totally unsatisfied" to 10 "totally satisfied".

  11. Values of Job satisfaction

    Time frame: baseline, and two months at the end of intervention (14 months).

    A Likert scale from 0 totally unsatisfied" to 10 "totally satisfied".

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo

Other

Registry information

Official study title

"Self-perceived Health, Pain Intensity, and Work Ability of Individuals With Chronic Work-related Musculoskeletal Disease Followed up in a Multidisciplinary Care Program."

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 9, 2021
Registry last updated
Dec 9, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.