Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100853, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07648992
This study aims to compare individualized anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) dosing versus conventional fixed-dose regimens in unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (URD-PBSCT).
This study notes that URD-HSCT is a key treatment for malignant hematologic diseases and severe bone marrow failure, with rapid expansion in China. However, this study identifies post-transplant CMV infection as a major challenge, adversely affecting survival and quality of life. This study finds that CMV infection compromises immunity and causes multi-organ complications. Given the high costs, long treatment cycles, and limited efficacy of current interventions, this study considers optimizing CMV prevention to be of greater value than expanding treatment options. This study asserts that effective prevention can reduce infection rates and improve overall survival (OS) and long-term prognosis.
This study recognizes that ATG is widely used in URD-HSCT to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but its dosage is significantly linked to CMV risk. This study indicates that inadequate ATG exposure increases GVHD risk, while excessive exposure raises viral reactivation (e.g., CMV, EBV) and may cause relapse. This study thus identifies balancing GVHD prevention and infection control as a key clinical goal. This study cites Remberger et al. (2004), who compared ATG doses (4-10 mg/kg) in 162 URD-HSCT patients, finding lower doses increased acute GVHD (aGVHD) and 10 mg/kg raised infection-related mortality, suggesting 6-8 mg/kg as a balanced range. This study also references Bacigalupo et al. (2001), who found no survival differences across doses but noted higher doses reduced severe aGVHD at the cost of increased infection. Therefore, this study concludes that optimal ATG dosing requires balancing GVHD, infection, and relapse.
This study acknowledges that ATG pharmacokinetics (PK) are complex, influenced by dose, body weight, and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC). This study points out that even with fixed dosing, internal exposure (active ATG-AUC) varies greatly among individuals, indicating that fixed dosing is suboptimal and individualized strategies are needed. This study notes that Admiraal et al. developed an ALC-based individualized ATG model, improving immune reconstitution, reducing viral infections, and enhancing OS. However, this study observes that this model was designed for non-myeloablative conditioning and is not applicable to myeloablative conditioning (MAC), which is standard in China.
To address this, this study states that our team initiated ATG PK studies in 2019. This study explains that under MAC, ALC is nearly eliminated, making traditional models unsuitable. By monitoring active ATG-AUC in 106 haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) patients and using machine learning, this study identified an optimal exposure window of 100-148.5 UE·day/mL. This study found that patients within this window had lower CMV/EBV reactivation without increased GVHD. This study developed a protocol adjusting doses on days -3 and -2 based on ATG concentrations measured on days -5 and -4. This study confirmed through a prospective single-arm study in haplo-HSCT that this regimen reduces CMV/EBV infection and improves disease-free survival (DFS) and OS while maintaining GVHD control.
Given the consistency between URD-PBSCT and haplo-PBSCT in conditioning, GVHD prophylaxis, and CMV prevention-and that CMV infection rates in Chinese URD-PBSCT patients reach 65%-70%-this study extends the individualized ATG protocol to URD-PBSCT to validate its universality across donor sources.
In summary, building on prior haploidentical transplant research, this study applies individualized ATG dosing to URD-PBSCT. This study aims to precisely regulate ATG exposure to reduce CMV infection while maintaining GVHD prophylaxis. This study seeks to improve patient survival and outcomes, laying the foundation for a population PK model and advancing HSCT toward precision medicine.
Interested in participating?
Request Info14 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100853, China
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
3.Patient age < 14 years or > 65 years. 4.Pregnancy of either the donor or the recipient. 5.Presence of mental illness or other conditions that preclude compliance with the protocol.
Patients receiving individualized dosing of ATG + standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
The 1-year GVHD-free and relapse-free survival rate (1-year GRFS) is the proportion of patients who, within one year post-treatment, have not experienced: grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression, or disease relapse or progression.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Overall survival (OS) refers to the time from the start of treatment to the death of the patient for any reason.
Time frame: 180 days post-transplant
+180 days CMV virus reactivation rate refers to the time from randomization to CMV virus reactivation, relapse or death within 180 days post-transplant. The actual incidence rate is calculated as the number of patients with events / total number of cases × 100%.
Time frame: 100 days post-transplant
Acute GVHD incidence refers to the time from randomization to acute GVHD onset, relapse or death within 100 days post-transplant. The actual incidence rate is calculated as the number of patients with events / total number of cases × 100%.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Disease free survival (DFS) refers to the time from treatment to the first lymphoma recurrence.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) refers to the number of patients with hematologic or MRD relapse from randomization to the last follow-up.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Cumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) refers to death due to non-relapse causes while in complete remission (CR), measured as the number of patients with NRM from randomization to the last follow-up.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Treatment-related safety indicators mainly include the cumulative incidence of bacterial infection, viral infection, fungal infection, PTLD, and chronic GVHD from randomization to the last follow-up.
Time frame: 1 years after treatment
Immune reconstitution status refers to the actual incidence rate calculated as the number of patients with immune reconstitution / total number of cases × 100% from randomization to the last follow-up.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Daihong Liu
Other
Application of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin(ATG) Individualized Dosing Model in Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07579065
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Reggio Emilia, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07725263
Agranulocytosis, Anemia
Haikou, Hainan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03000244
Cellular Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Genetic Therapy
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05605574
Behavior, Communication
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details