Standard dosing of IV ganciclovir
DrugIV ganciclovir at standard dosing
NCT Number: NCT06574789
This study is being conducted at seven major children's hospitals in Australia and New Zealand to test a new approach for treating a virus, called cytomegalovirus in children with weakened immune systems. The researchers want to find out if using a web app to customise the dose of a medication called ganciclovir is better at clearing the virus over a six-week period compared to the standard method of giving the medication.
Interested in participating?
Request Info1 month–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Immunocompromised children between 1 months to 18 years with cytomegalovirus viraemia who are admitted to one of the participating sites will be enrolled into the trial if eligible (see eligibility criteria) and randomly allocated into two groups. Children in the 'control- standard dosing group' will receive standard intravenous ganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus viraemia at a standard dosing of at 5mg/kg IV BD. Children in the "intervention: individualised dosing using a web app group" will receive a personalised intravenous ganciclovir dose calculated using an individualised IV ganciclovir dosing app. This approach considers the patient's weight, creatinine level, and target drug exposure, allowing for tailored dosing based on individual pharmacokinetic parameters. The virological clearance by 6 weeks of the children in each of the two groups will be compared.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
IV ganciclovir at standard dosing
IV ganciclovir at a personalised dosing calculated using a ganciclovir dosing web app
Time frame: 42 days
CMV virological clearance by 6 weeks to be compared between the two treatment groups. * Virological clearance defined as two consecutives negative CMV polymerase chain reaction results, or detectable but CMV viral load is less than the lower limit of detection. Separated by at least 72 hours by 6-weeks (42 days) after randomisation.
Time frame: 21 days
The proportion of children who achieve virological clearance before 3-weeks (21 days) to be compared between the two treatment arms. Virological clearance defined as two consecutives negative CMV polymerase chain reaction results, or detectable but CMV viral load is less than the lower limit of detection. Separated by at least 72 hours.
Time frame: 42 days
The proportion of children who develop CMV disease by 6 weeks to be compared between the two treatment groups. CMV disease assessed by the treating clinician based on signs/symptoms of disease followed by microbiological confirmation at the 6-week assessment.
Time frame: 6 months
All-cause mortality by 6 months to be compared between the two treatment groups. All-cause mortality assessed by chart ± telephone review by the research team at 6-month timepoint.
Time frame: 6 months
The proportion of children who develop drug resistant CMV infection by 6 months to be compared between the two treatment groups. Children with refractory or further CMV infections following resolution of the initial infection will be evaluated for CMV-resistance through gene testing (UL97 and UL54).
Time frame: 42 days
The proportion of children with any treatment-related AEs to be compared between the two treatment groups. Assessed at end of treatment or at 6 weeks (whichever is later) by the treating team.
Time frame: 7 days, 42 days, 180 days
Quality of Life (QoL) over the 6-month period following randomisation to be compared between the two treatment groups using the QoL EQ-5D-Y questionnaire, assessed at 7 days, 42 days and 180 days.
The EQ-5D-Y descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, looking after oneself, doing usual activities, having pain or discomfort and feeling worried, sad or unhappy. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems and a lot of problems.
The final question measures how good or bad the participants' health is that day on a scale from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health they can imagine and 0 means the worst health they can imagine.
Time frame: 6 months
The total sum of all hospital and patient/family resources required per patient over the 6-month period to be compared between the two treatment groups.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Alice Lei
CONTACT
Sharelle Joseland
CONTACT
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Other
Acronym: ID-MAGIC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02784756
Cytomegalovirus Viraemia
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT02370758
Cytomegalovirus Viraemia
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details