Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07211269

Individual Differences in Cognitive Control Predict Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback Performance

The goal of this study is to investgate whether individual differences of cognitive control capacity could predict neurofeedback performance and the behavioral effects resulting from successful anterior insula regulation via interoceptive strategy.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Chengdu, 611731, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Shuxia Yao

CONTACT

[email protected]

18111297596

About this study

The experimental protocol comprises two visits with a 3-7 days interval. The first visit includes: (1) completion of standardized psychological questionnaires, (2) pre-test of the heartbeat counting task (HCT), and (3) four validated cognitive control tasks, including the Go/No-Go task, Stroop task, Task-switching task, N-back task. The main task of the second visit is a fMRI task followed by a post-test of the HCT. The MRI scanning protocol includes anatomical scan, two resting-state scans (pre- and post-training), four runs of fMRI neurofeedback training and a transfer run without feedback. During the regulation block of the training task, participants are asked to upregulate the anterior insula activity followed by a pain empathy rating and strategy efficacy rating. All participants receive real-time neurofeedback from the left anterior insula. Scores of questionnaires including Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ, Autism Spectrum Quotient, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Toronto Alexithymia scale, Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire, Interoceptive Confusion Questionnaire, Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Cognitive Flexibility Inventory are also collected before the experiment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy subjects without any past or present psychiatric or neurological disorders

Exclusion criteria

  • History of brain injury Medical or mental illness and color blindness or weakness.
  • The presence of metal in the body or claustrophobia.

Treatment and study plan

Real-time fMRI neurofeedback training

Other

Real-time neurofeedback information is computed using the Turbo Brain voyager (TBV) 4.0 software (Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The Netherlands). Functional images are collected and processed in real time based on contrasts of regulation vs. rest conditions. The BOLD signal of the target region is then transformed into visual bars and displayed to participants via the projector screen while participants keep using regulation strategy (heartbeat interoception in our study) to upregulate the target region.

Primary outcomes

  1. BOLD signal of the anterior insula during neurofeedback training

    Time frame: 1 hour

    The anterior insula activity induced by regulation relative to rest blocks in the neurofeedback training task and transfer task.

  2. Behavioral measurements in the cognitive control tasks

    Time frame: 1 hour

    Response time and accuracy are recorded in the cognitive control tasks (i.e., the Go/No-Go task, Stroop task, Task-switching, N-back task).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain empathy ratings scores

    Time frame: 1 hour

    Subjects were required to rate their empathic feeling towards painful pictures on a Likert Scale ranging from 1-9 (1 = not at all and 9 = very painful) after each block.

  2. Strategy efficacy rating scores

    Time frame: 1 hour

    Subjects were required to rate the strategy efficacy on a Likert Scale ranging from 1-9 (1 = not at all and 9 = very) after each block.

  3. Intero-ceptive accuracy

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    The ratio of participants' perceived number of heartbeat relative to the recorded number of heartbeat in the heartbeat counting task.

  4. Confidence rating scores of interoceptive sensitivity

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Subjects were asked to rate to what extent they can feel their heartbeat based on a Likert Scale ranging from 1-9 (1 = very low and 9 = very high) in the heartbeat counting task.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Keith M Kendrick, Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

86-28-61830811

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Oct 7, 2025
Registry last updated
Oct 7, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.