Faculty of Dentistry
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04848987
The present study was designed to provide further evidence in this particular research prospective, and this study hence aimed to clinically evaluate the 5-years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations. The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performances of the three different resin cement strategies for luting indirect resin composite inlays in MOD Class II restorations for 5-years.
The research question was as follows: Do self-adhesive resin cements in class II restorations present better clinical performances than conventional etch-and-rinse and self-etch resin cements according to the USPHS criteria?
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35516, Egypt
Objective: To clinically evaluate the 5 years adhesion durability of indirect resin composite inlays luted with three different resin cement strategies in MOD Class II restorations.
Materials and Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted following the protocol, 40 patients with three large cavities for each one that indicated for indirect MOD Class II restorations were enrolled in the current study. Then, 120 indirect resin composite inlay restorations (SR Nexco) were placed and luted with three different resin cement strategies; an etch-and-rinse (Variolink N), self-etch (Panavia F2.0) and self-adhesive (RelyX Unicem). Each resin cement was used for luting 20 inlay restorations. A single operator placed all restorations according to the manufacturer's instructions. Immediatelly after placement, the restorations were finished and polished. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and at 1, 3 and 5 years intervals after placement by two independent examiners using modified USPHS criteria. The changes in the USPHS parameters during the 5 years period were analyzed with Fredman test. The baseline scores were compared with those at the recall visits using Wilcoxon signed rank test, where the level of significance was set at p˂0.05.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Etching enamel surface using phosphoric acid
Time frame: 5 years after restoration procedure
Percentage of marginal staining in patients was clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restorations were given the score Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for clinically acceptable and Charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need for replacement.
Mansoura University
Other
Indirect Resin Composite Inlays Cemented With Three Different Luting Strategies
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05383768
Dental Leakage, Stomatognathic Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06377423
Dental Leakage, Stomatognathic Diseases
Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT05161559
Dental Leakage, Stomatognathic Diseases
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03542019
Dental Caries, Dental Leakage
Amman, Jordan
View Trial Details