University Hospital Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, 34295, France
NCT Number: NCT02337140
Since 2002, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has resulted in a dramatic change in the prognosis of patients with aortic valve stenosis illegible to surgery. However, this intervention may induce heavy conduction disorder due to the proximity of the aortic annulus and the conduction pathways. So far, there is no clear recommandation for clinical management of conduction disorder after TAVI. Standard criterion cannot be applied due to the multiple comorbidity factors observed in these patients. As described in conventional aortic valve surgery, a degree of inflammation and ischemia of the conduction pathways may be involved in the first days. This is the reason underlying the systematic implantation of epicardial electrodes. Such temporary back-up pacing is not possible in TAVI patients.
The primary end-point of this study is to confirm that standard criterion for pacing are reliable in post-TAVI conduction disorders and to analyze the contribution of a systematic electrophysiological study (EPS).
In TAVI patients, indications for pacing were persistent high-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) or bundle branch block appearance associated to HV interval longer than 70ms, 24 hours after the procedure.
After a two-month follow-up, clinical and ECG evaluation and 24-hour holter monitoring will be realized in patients without pacemaker and compared to data obtained from the devices in pacemaker-implanted patients (% of ventricular pacing > 1% ; presence of more than 1 AVB episod).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Montpellier, 34295, France
Inclusions will take place from August 2014 to February 2015. We plan to include 165 consecutive patients with TAVI through a femoral approach.
At the inclusion, clinical baseline and electrocardiographic data will be collected. During the procedure, baseline ECG data as well as conduction disorders will be recorded. An EP study will be performed (measure of AH and HV intervals) before and after TAVI. Aortic surface area, transvalvular mean gradient, presence of periprothetic leak and LV ejection fraction will be determined by echocardiography within the first 24 hours.
After the procedure, a 24-hour ECG monitoring will be done in ICU. A pacemaker will be implanted in case of persistent severe conduction disorders at 24 hours post-TAVI . All patients will be implanted with SORIN Group KORA DR devices to benefit from the AAI-SafeR mode and the AVB episodes automated analysis. All implanted pacemakers will be settled with identical parameters to allow appropriate patient data analysis (AAI-SafeR for sinus rhythm patients and VVIR in chronic atrial fibrillation patients).
In patients with 24-hour persistence of bundle branch block onset after TAVI, a repeated EPS with HV recording will be performed. If HV interval is > 70ms, a pacemaker will be implanted and the patient will be added to the pacemaker-implanted patients. In the absence of persistent conduction disorder 24h after the procedure, no specific supervision will be done.
All patients will have a 2-month follow up. At this time, clinical, ECG and echocardiographic data will be collected. Additional 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring will be performed in non-implanted patients and additional device control will be performed in implanted patients. Pacemaker implantation will be confirmed if there is more than 1% of ventricular pacing or at least one DDD mode switch.
In non-implanted patients, the non-indication for pacing was confirmed in the absence of clinical event and 24-hour Holter ECG recording abnormality.
The secondary endpoint of the study is to define a posteriori risk factors for pacemaker implantation after TAVI included in the liste hereafter:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 2 months
Pacemaker implantation will be confirmed if there is more than 1% of ventricular pacing or at least one DDD mode switch in the memories.
In non-implanted patients, the non-indication for pacing was confirmed in the absence of clinical event and 24-hour Holter ECG recording abnormality.
Time frame: 2 months
QRS width (milliseconds), space PR (milliseconds), presence of conduction disorders (atrioventricular block, block right or left branch), axis (degrees), sinus rhythm (yes / no)
Time frame: 2 months
LVEF (in%), aortic valve area (cm2 / m2), aortic regurgitation (grade I / IV)
Time frame: 2 months
CoreValve, Edwards
Time frame: 2 months
high or low relative to the ring plane
Time frame: 2 months
Time frame: 2 months
yes/no
Time frame: 2 months
HV interval measurement before and after the intervention (ms)
Time frame: 2 months
Time frame: 2 months
ischemic heart disease history (specify bypass or angioplasty), cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, obesity, smoking ...), patient age
Time frame: 2 months
creatinine before surgery, troponin after surgery
University Hospital, Montpellier
Other
Indication of Permanent Cardiac Parcing After Tanscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation : Contribution of Electrophysioly Study
Acronym: TAVISTIM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05479188
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Thessaloniki, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT07251660
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
View Trial DetailsNCT02729519
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Montpellier, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07605780
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Brescia, BS, Italy
View Trial Details