Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06467214

Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness

Social isolation is a negative social determinant of health that affects 1-in-5 adults in the U.S. and 43% of Veterans. Social isolation is estimated to cost the nation $6.7 billion annually in federal healthcare spending. Yet, social isolation has rarely been the direct focus of healthcare interventions. The proposed project is a randomized controlled trial that seeks to test the effectiveness of the Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention on social isolation among diverse Veteran groups in primary care clinics. Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness involves three key services delivered by peers via telehealth through individual and group sessions over 8 weeks: 1) peer support, which includes person-centered assessment for social isolation, 2) psychosocial interventions to address social isolation, and 3) navigation (i.e., connecting Veterans to social resources). Findings from this study will contribute to the VA's efforts to address social determinants of health among Veterans and to provide high quality, person-centered, and equitable care to all Veterans.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-2884, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Diana Natividad, BA MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

(317) 988-3114

Jasma Adams, BA MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

Johanne Eliacin, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Marianne Sassi Matthias, PhD MS BA

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Background: Social isolation is a global public health threat and a negative social determinant of health that affects 1 in 5 adults in the U.S. and contributes to $6.7 billion in annual healthcare spending.

Significance: Affecting roughly 43% of Veterans, social isolation is highly prevalent among Veterans, particularly those with a history of mental illness. Social isolation contributes to cardiovascular diseases, dementia, depression, suicidal ideation, and premature death. To date, social isolation remains largely unaddressed as a negative social determinant of health in healthcare systems. Current efforts to address social isolation are limited by lack of diverse participant samples, rigorous methodologies, and involvement of healthcare systems to systematically assess and reduce social isolation.

Innovation and Impact: To address these gaps, the proposed project will test a novel and feasible program to intervene on social isolation among diverse Veteran populations in the Veterans Health Administration healthcare system. The investigators propose to test the effects of the Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention on social isolation among Veterans. The Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention uses an innovative approach by integrating two existing evidence-based care models: peer services and patient navigation to address social isolation among Veterans in Veterans Health Administration primary care clinics. Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention involves three key services delivered by peer specialists via telehealth over 8 weeks: 1) peer support, which includes person-centered assessment of factors driving social isolation; 2) psychosocial interventions to address Veterans' social isolation (e.g., goal setting, supportive therapy, and group-based social engagement activities); and 3) navigation (i.e., connecting Veterans to social resources in the community and the Veterans Health Administration) to help expand their social networks. Because prior social isolation studies have not prioritized inclusion of younger and racially/ethnically diverse samples, the investigators will over sample these groups using stratified random sampling.

Specific Aims: The investigators aim for a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention to an attention control group. Aim1: Test the effects of Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention on social isolation at 2-, 4-, and 8-months from baseline compared to the control group; Aim2: Test the effects of CONNECTED on secondary, health-related outcomes; and Aim 3: Conduct formative and pre-implementation evaluations to inform future implementation processes.

Methodology: Aims 1 and 2 involve delivering the intervention to (N=264) Veterans in Veterans Health Administration primary care clinics. Data from Aims 1 and 2 will be analyzed using general linear models. In Aim 3, the investigators will describe Veterans (n=20) and providers' experiences (N=10) with the intervention using semi-structured interviews to identify barriers and facilitators to the Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention's future implementation. The investigators will also survey peers and peer supervisors (n=20) from VISN10 VA facilities (n=13) and interview a subgroup of survey completers (n=8) to evaluate factors that may affect potential adoption of the Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention in Veterans Health Administration and to identify future implementation strategies. Qualitative data from Aim 3 will be analyzed using an inductive/deductive approach.

Next Steps & Implementation: Should this trial be successful the investigators will work with operational partners to implement the Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention in the Veterans Health Administration. The next step will also involve the evaluation of Increasing Veterans' Social Engagement and Connectedness (CONNECTED) intervention's core elements and its implementation in diverse Veterans Health Administration facilities.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Eligible participants for Aim 1 & Aim 2

  • Must be Veterans at the Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center or its Community-Based Outpatient Clinics who had a primary care encounter in the prior 6 months and
  • Veteran obtained a score 12, indicating social isolation, on the Lubben Social Isolation Scale (LSNS-6), a validated, 6-item social isolation measure, at the time of screening in Aim 1.

Exclusion criteria

For Aim 1 and Aim 2, the investigators will exclude Veterans with

  • Active suicidal ideation needing immediate mental health treatment
  • severe cognitive, hearing or speech impairment,
  • current exacerbation of severe psychiatric symptoms (e.g., active psychosis), or
  • severe illness that makes study participation not feasible.

Treatment and study plan

CONNECTED

Behavioral

CONNECTED is a manualized, peer-led, group-based social isolation intervention for diverse veteran populations in VA primary care settings. It is delivered via videoconference through individual and group sessions over 8 weeks.

VET BEFRIENDING

Behavioral

VET BEFRIENDING (attention control arm) consists of weekly social interactions with a research assistant (RA) over videoconference or phone.

Primary outcomes

  1. Lubben Social Network Scale-6

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8 months

    The Lubben Social Network Scale-6 is a widely used, 6-item, self-reported measure of social isolation. It measures the frequency, size, and closeness of contact from respondents' social network. The scale has been used in both young and older adult populations, in racially diverse groups and in various settings and countries. Items are scored on a 6-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 0 (minimum) to 30 (maximum). Scores ≤ 12 indicate social isolation. The Lubben Social Network Scale-6 has strong internal consistency ( alpha = 0.83) and item reliability. There are no subscales.

Secondary outcomes

  1. UCLA Loneliness Scale Short Form

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8 months

    The UCLA Loneliness Scale Short Form is a 6-item, self-reported measure, rated on a 4-point Likert Scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (often). Items are summed for a total score ranging from 6 (minimum) to 24 (maximum). There is no subscale. The scale has demonstrated internal consistency. Higher scores indicate greater loneliness. The Cronbach coefficient alpha for this sample was 0.90.

  2. General Anxiety Disorder

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8 months

    General Anxiety Disorder-7, a validated self-reported measure of anxiety. It has 7 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale, 0=not at all to 3= nearly every day. The scale has a total summed score of 0 (minimum) to 21 (maximum). It has shown reliability, internal consistency ( = 0.89), and good sensitivity. A meaningful change is indicated by 5 or more points. A total score of 1-4 indicates minimal symptoms, 5-9 mild symptoms, 10-14 moderate symptoms, and 12-21 severe symptoms.

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8 months

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is a self-administered instrument used for screening, diagnosing, and monitoring the severity of depression. It has 9 items rated on a 4-point Likert Scale, ranging from 0=not at all to 3= nearly every day. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score is obtained by adding score for each item, for a total points ranging from 0 (minimum) to 27 (maximum). Total scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cutpoints for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression respectively. The internal reliability of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was excellent, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89.

  4. Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8 months

    Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support scale is self-administered. It has 12-items, measured on a 7-point a Likert scale (1=very strongly disagree) to 7=(very strongly agree). Total scale score is the sum across all 12 items. It can also be calculated as a mean score (divided by 12). Summed total score ranges from 12 (minimum) to 84 (maximum). The scale has high internal consistency ( alpha = .88). There is no established population norms on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. There are 3 subscales. There are 3 subscales, with 4 item each. Their scores are the sum of the items divided by 4. Significant Other subscale (items 1, 2, 5, 10), Family subscale (3, 4, 8, 11), and Friends subscale (6, 7, 9, 12).

  5. Social Connectedness Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8 months

    The Social Connectedness Scale is a widely used 8-item measure that assesses aspects of belongingness, affiliation, and companionship. It is rated on a 6-point Likert scale, 1=strongly disagree to 6=strongly agree. The items are then summed for a total score, ranging from 8 (minimum) to 36 (maximum). A high score indicates more connectedness to others or reflects a greater sense of social connectedness. Internal reliability estimates for the 2 scales were .91 and .82, respectively.

  6. Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener

    Time frame: As indicated by endorsement of suicidal ideation on Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    "The Columbia Protocol, also known as the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, supports suicide risk assessment through a series of simple, plain-language questions that anyone can ask. The answers help users identify whether someone is at risk for suicide, assess the severity and immediacy of that risk, and gauge the level of support that the person needs. The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener evidenced excellent internal consistency (ordinal alpha = .95). Users of the tool ask people:

    Whether and when they have thought about suicide (ideation) What actions they have taken - and when - to prepare for suicide Whether and when they attempted suicide or began a suicide attempt that was either interrupted by another person or stopped of their own volition"

  7. Veterans RAND-12

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8 months

    The Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey is a brief, generic, multi-use, self-administered health survey comprised of 12 items. The instrument is primarily used to measure health related quality of life, to estimate disease burden and to evaluate disease-specific benchmarks with other populations. The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. Its Internal consistency is high (s = .87 to .96).

  8. Life Engagement Test

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8 months

    The Life Engagement Test is a 6-item survey that measures the extent to which a person engages in activities that are valued (alpha = .80)

  9. PTSD symptoms -Life Event Checklist (PCL-5)

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 4, 8 months

    The PCL-5 is a widely used, 20-item self-report questionnaire used to screen for and diagnose probable PTSD. It evaluates the presence and severity of PTSD symptoms over the past month. The scale has strong internal consistency α =.94, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). All items are summed to create a total score that ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores reflect a greater degree of distress or severity of PTSD symptoms. The recommended optimal cut-off score of >33 will be used to indicate probable PTSD.

  10. Life Events Checklist (LEC-5)

    Time frame: Baseline only

    The LEC-5 is a self-report tool designed to assess exposure to potentially traumatic events in adults, such as physical assault, sexual assault, combat, or life-threatening illness. Respondents indicate whether each event: happened to them personally, was witnessed, learned about in a close family member or friend, occurred as part of their job, or does not apply. The LEC-5 does not produce a formal score and is used in combination with the PCL-5 to evaluate PTSD symptoms.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Carrie Ballard, BA AS

CONTACT

[email protected]

(317) 988-9532

Johanne Eliacin, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

(317) 988-5298

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Fed

Registry information

Acronym: CONNECTED

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 20, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 29, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.