Florida State University
Tallahassee, Florida, 32304, United States
NCT Number: NCT06598111
The goal of this experiment is to learn how to effectively increase motivation to reduce dietary restriction among young adults engaging in clinically significant restrictive eating. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* Does imagining a future without restrictive eating increase motivation to reduce restrictive eating? * Does imagining a future without restrictive eating reduce actual restrictive eating behavior? * Is it more motivating to think about long-term benefits of reducing dietary restriction, or to focus on short-term consequences of dietary restriction?
Researchers will compare (1) amplifying the possible benefits of reducing restrictive eating, (2) amplifying the negative consequences of restrictive eating, or (3) both is more effective for increasing motivation to reduce dietary restriction over a one-week period.
Participants will:
* Complete daily measures of eating disorder symptoms and motivation for 7 days * Write a narrative describing a day in the future without restrictive eating and read this narrative aloud daily for 7 days * Be presented with information regarding the negative consequences of dietary restriction daily for 7 days
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tallahassee, Florida, 32304, United States
This study tests whether amplifying the potential benefits of reducing dietary restriction and/or consequences of maintaining dietary restriction increases motivation to address disordered (i.e., restrictive) eating among college students. This is an online study with a between-groups experimental design which takes place over the course of one week. All study procedures are completed online.
Participants are randomized to one of four conditions: Amplified Benefits & Consequences, Amplified Benefits, Amplified Consequences, or a control condition. Baseline measures are completed on the first day of study enrollment, following randomization to experimental condition. Over the subsequent six days, participants receive daily surveys via email every 24 hours and are given 24 hours to complete each survey. In every condition, participants complete daily self-report measures. Depending on condition, participants also completed the following manipulations:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants write a brief, detailed narrative describing a day in their future if they did not restrict their caloric intake and were not concerned about their body weight or shape.
Participants complete the Pros and Cons of Anorexia scale to amplify the consequences of restrictive eating. They are also presented with blurbs about the consequences of restrictive eating.
Participants write a brief narrative considering a future free of concern about finances.
Time frame: Baseline (day 0), day 1, day 2, day 3 day 4, day 5, day 6
Dietary restraint was measured using two items drawn from the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire. Each item was rated on a 1-6 scale ranging from 1 (Not at all/never) to 6 (Markedly/all the time). Scores on each item were averaged to create a single dietary restraint score. Changes in daily scores were used to quantify changes in dietary restraint over time.
Time frame: Baseline (day 0), day 1, day 2, day 3 day 4, day 5, day 6
Motivation was measured using the Readiness and Motivation Questionnaire, which is a self-report measure assessing motivation to change disordered attitudes and behaviors. Items reflect four categories: precontemplation, action, internality, and confidence. Respondents rate each item on a percentage scale ranging from zero to 100. The RMQ was modified to include only items assessing dietary restriction, with one item assessing each of the aforementioned categories. Items were anchored to the last 24 hours. Changes in daily scores were used to quantify changes in motivation over time.
Time frame: Baseline (day 0), day 1, day 2, day 3 day 4, day 5, day 6
Body dissatisfaction was measured using two items drawn from the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire. Each item was rated on a 1-6 scale ranging from 1 (Not at all/never) to 6 (Markedly/all the time). Scores on each item were averaged to create a single body dissatisfaction score. Changes in daily scores were used to quantify changes in body dissatisfaction over time.
Time frame: Baseline (day 0), day 1, day 2, day 3 day 4, day 5, day 6
Shape/weight overvaluation was measured using three items drawn from the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire. Each item was rated on a 1-6 scale ranging from 1 (Not at all/never) to 6 (Markedly/all the time). Scores on each item were averaged to create a single shape/weight overvaluation score. Changes in daily scores were used to quantify changes in shape/weight overvaluation over time.
Florida State University
Other
Amplifying Consequences to Reduce Dietary Restriction: a Proof-of-Concept Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.