Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02005497

Increasing Implementation of Evidence-based Interventions at Low-wage Worksites

The proposed project will answer key questions about implementing evidence-based health promotion interventions at small and low-wage worksites. Small, low-wage worksites will be randomized to receive HealthLinks (a free American Cancer Society program to disseminate evidence-based interventions), HealthLinks+ (which will include creating worksite wellness committees as part of the program), or to serve in a delayed control group. This approach will identify successful strategies for implementing evidence-based interventions at low-wage worksites to improve workers' cancer screening, healthy eating, physical activity, and tobacco cessation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center

Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States

About this study

Cancer and other chronic diseases are leading killers and disablers in the United States, and low-income Americans are at high risk for these diseases. Multiple evidence-based interventions (EBIs) exist to improve chronic disease risk behaviors, such as cancer screening, healthy eating, physical activity, and tobacco cessation, yet EBI reach to community settings is poor. Among community settings for reaching low-income adults, worksites stand out because most low-income adults are employed, but worksite implementation of health-promoting EBIs is low. Half of American workers work in small or low-wage worksites, where implementation of these EBIs and readiness to implement are especially low. Even though decision-makers at these worksites are often motivated to promote worker health, they usually have no dedicated wellness staff and face three major barriers in implementing EBIs: 1) lack of awareness of the potential benefits of EBIs, 2) lack of knowledge to choose EBIs, and 3) lack of financial and personnel resources to implement EBIs. Non-profit organizations and others who would assist these worksites face their own barriers. Organizational readiness to implement EBIs is not well understood, and few validated measures are available, especially for worksites. Without reliable and valid measures of worksite readiness, those who would assist them have difficulty: a) identifying worksites that are ready, and b) helping decision-makers get ready to increase their odds of implementation success. The proposed research will address both sets of barriers and contribute to dissemination and implementation research by testing the efficacy of a worksite EBI dissemination program, HealthLinks, developed in partnership with the American Cancer Society, a non-profit organization operating nationwide. HealthLinks is based on Greenhalgh's diffusion of innovations framework and Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory and addresses small and low-wage worksites' barriers by providing free on-site information and recommendations for EBIs and by providing free on-site programs and temporary staffing to assist implementation. We will test HealthLinks via a 3-arm randomized controlled trial. Worksites will receive either 1) HealthLinks, or 2) an enhanced version of HealthLinks that addresses small worksites' lack of personnel by adding worker wellness committees, or will 3) serve in a delayed control group that receives HealthLinks at study end. We will measure worksites' EBI implementation at baseline, 12 months (at the end of the intervention period), and 24 months (to assess maintenance one year after the intervention ends). This design will test the effectiveness of both HealthLinks and of worker wellness committees. We will also measure the effect of both on workers' health behaviors at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Finally, we will develop, pilot-test, and validate a measure of worksite readiness to implement EBIs.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(for worksites):

  • 20-200 employees
  • In one of the following industries: accommodation and food services; arts, entertainment, and recreation; educational services, health care and social assistance, other services excluding public administration, retail trade
  • Located in King County, Washington State

Exclusion criteria

  • Has a wellness committee
  • Fewer than 20% of workers report to a physical worksite

Treatment and study plan

HealthLinks

Other

Primary outcomes

  1. Worksite implementation of evidence-based health promotion interventions

    Time frame: up to 24 months

    The intervention being tested promotes a package of evidence-based health promotion interventions. The primary outcome is the proportion of these interventions the worksites are implementing at each time-point assessed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Workers' health behaviors related to cancer screening, nutrition, physical activity, and tobacco use

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months

    Workers at participating worksites will complete brief surveys at each time-point assessed that measure their health behaviors related to breast, cervical, and colon cancer screening, healthy eating, physical activity, and tobacco use/cessation.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Washington

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Dec 9, 2013
Registry last updated
Nov 1, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.