Increasing Food Literacy in Preschoolers to Reduce Obesity Risk

Teachers reports of each child's willingness to try and liking of weekly target foods; lab-created measure. Scores for trying (yes/no) and liking (yes/no) are summed to create total scores for each. Scores range from 0 to 26 for trying and liking. Higher scores indicate a higher frequency of trying weekly foods and higher frequency of liking seeking foods.

Observed measure of children's willingness to try 4 novel foods (The Tasting Game; lab-created measure). The child scores 1 point for each bite of food that is tasted or eaten. Scores for each range from 0 (none tasted/eaten) to 3 (all pieces tasted/eaten). Total scores range from 0 to 12, and are created by summing the points obtained for each food item. Higher scores indicate a greater willingness to try foods.

Observed measure of children's ability to name/identify 6 foods using pictures (Food Literacy Scale; lab-created measure). Children receive a score of 0 (incorrect/don't know), 1 (correctly identified on the second pass), or 2 (correctly named on the first pass) points. Total scores range from 0 to 12, and are created by summing the points obtained for each food item. Higher scores indicate higher food literacy or ability to identify foods.

Observed measure of children's ability to differentiate between nutrient- and energy-dense foods using the Snack Selection Protocol (Sigma-Grant et al., 2014). Children receive 1 point for each nutrient-dense food item chosen. Scores range from 0-18, with higher scores indicating nutrient-dense foods being chosen more often energy-dense foods.

Observed measure of children's food choices when given the option to choose a nutrient- vs. energy-dense snack (live-coded; lab-created measure). Children receive a score of either 0 (energy-dense food chosen) or 1 (nutrient-dense food chosen).

Child age- and sex-specific Body Mass Indices (BMI) from measured height and weight. Conditional weight gain (rate of change in children's BMIz), will be calculated as the standardized residual of the linear regression of post-intervention BMIz predicted by baseline BMIz, adjusted for child age and sex.

Children's requests for foods used in the study, as well as general requests for fruits and vegetables (Fruit and Vegetable Survey; lab-created measure).

Measure of food approach and avoidance behaviors (e.g., satiety responsiveness and food enjoyment) measured using the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (Wardle et al., 2001). Response options range from 1 to 5 and subscale scores are calculated by averaging the items within each subscale. Higher scores for any subscale indicate the respondent's perception of a greater degree of the particular eating style in the child.

Measure of children's previous experience and familiarity with target foods using the Children's Food Exposure Questionnaire (lab-created). Scores are calculated by averaging the items within each subscale. Subscale 1 scores range from 0-8 points, subscales 2-6 scores range from 0-3. Higher scores for subscales indicate (1) higher availability of fruits and vegetables; (2) more encouragement to eat fruits and vegetables; (3) more modeling of fruit and vegetable consumption by mothers; (4) more asking for fruits and vegetables by children; (4) children have more barriers to eat fruits and vegetables; (6) and caregivers have more barriers to eat fruits and vegetables respectively.

A lab-created, parent-report measure of children's media use while eating. Response options on this 3-item measure range from 1 to 4. Scores are calculated by averaging the items, with higher scores indicate a higher frequency of the child eating while watching television.

Measure of parents' food-related practices (e.g., coercive vs. responsive feeding practices) using the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (Musher-Eizenman & Holub, 2007). This instrument includes 12 sub scales with response options ranging from 1-5; items are averaged to create each sub scale. Higher scores indicate a greater degree or frequency of use of the food parenting strategy.

Parent/caregiver knowledge about topics such as appropriate portion sizes, number of snacks preschoolers need each day, etc. using an adapted version of a Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire developed by Rapson et al. (2020). This adapted 53-item questionnaire includes forced-choice and open-ended questions. Respondents score 1 point for correct answers on all nutrition knowledge items and 0 points for an incorrect or "choose not to answer" response. Incorrect responses, or responses that are contradictory to nutrition guidelines are also scored as 0 points. A composite score is obtained by summing answers to all nutrition knowledge items. Higher scores indicate a higher levels of nutrition knowledge to support healthy eating/feeding practices for preschool aged children.

Household, adult and child food insecurity and hunger measured using the 18-item U.S. Household Food Security Survey. If there is no missing data, respondents can be categorized based on their sum score across all 18 questions. Categories and their respective scores are as follows: (1) High Food Security: 0-2 points, (2) Marginal Food Security: 3-7 points, (3) Low Food Security: 8-12 points, and (4) Very Low Food Security: 13-18 points. Affirmative items (with responses) are summed to create a raw score, with scores ranging from 0-18 points. Higher scores indicate greater household food insecurity.

Sociodemographic information, parent height and weight (lab-created questionnaire).

Childcare provider knowledge about topics such as appropriate portion sizes, number of snacks preschoolers need each day, etc. measured using an Early Childhood Educator Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire developed by Rapson et al. (2020). This 57-item questionnaire includes forced-choice and open-ended questions. Respondents score 1 point for correct answers on all nutrition knowledge items and 0 points for an incorrect or "choose not to answer" response. Incorrect responses, or responses that are contradictory to nutrition guidelines are also scored as 0 points. A composite score is obtained by summing answers to all nutrition knowledge items. Higher scores indicate a higher levels of nutrition knowledge to support healthy eating/feeding practices for preschool aged children.

Childcare provider mealtime behaviors and feeding practices measured using the About Feeding Children questionnaire (Swindle et al., 2018). This questionnaire contains 31 items and 9 subscales. Higher scores on each of the subscales indicate the degree to which the respondent utilizes the mealtime strategy or agrees with particular mealtime beliefs.

Sociodemographic information, teaching experience, height, weight, physical activity frequency (lab-created questionnaire).

An observational measure of the classroom food and mealtime environment. Response options range from 1 to 4, and scores are calculated by averaging the items within each subscale. Higher scores indicate (1) a higher degree of visuals that support healthy eating; and (2) teacher and child dynamics during mealtime that are consistent with healthy eating practices.

An adapted measure of classroom chaos using the Confusion, Hubbub and Order Scale for classrooms (Wachs et al., 2004). Response options range from 1 to 4, and a total score is calculated by averaging scores for 12 items. Higher scores indicate more chaos, disorganization, and noise level in the classroom.