Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
NCT Number: NCT04076618
The main goal of the proposed study is to compare the effects of weight loss (WL) alone with WL plus weighted vest use or WL plus resistance exercise training (RT) on indicators of bone health and subsequent fracture risk.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
The study team proposes that a 12 month trial in 150 older (60-85 years) adults with obesity (Body mass index or BMI=30-40 kg/m2 OR 27.0-<30 kg/m² and one obesity-related risk factor) randomized to one of three interventions (n=50/group): WL alone (WL; caloric restriction targeting 10% WL); WL plus weighted vest use (WL+Vest); targeting ≥8 hours/day, weight replacement titrated up to 10% WL); or, WL plus structured RT (WL+RT; 3 days/week). Total hip trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) is the primary outcome. This outcome will be complemented by exploratory assessment of several fracture-related risk factors, including: (1) femoral neck and lumbar spine vBMD, cortical thickness, finite element modeling of bone strength, and regional fat and muscle volumes, measured by CT; (2) areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the total hip, femoral neck, lumbar spine, and distal radius; trabecular bone score; and total body fat/lean masses, measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA); (3) muscle function and strength; (4) biomarkers of bone turnover; and (5) bone-regulating hormones/cytokines known to influence bone metabolism during WL. Therefore, the investigators Specific Aims are to:
Aim 1: Determine the effects of WL+Vest compared to WL and WL+RT on 12 month change in total hip trabecular vBMD. Despite similar reductions in total body weight, Hypothesis 1: Participants in the WL+Vest group will show attenuated losses of total hip trabecular vBMD versus WL; and Hypothesis 2: Loss in total hip trabecular vBMD will be no greater in WL+Vest compared to WL+RT.
Aim 2: Explore the effects of WL+Vest compared to WL and WL+RT on the 12 month change in fracture-related risk factors. Despite similar reductions in total body weight, we hypothesize that WL+Vest and WL+RT will demonstrate improvements in fracture-related risk factors compared to WL.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Weighted Vest worn > or = 8 hours per day
Structured exercise training 3 days a week
a 24-week intensive phase (with weekly dietary classes) followed by a 27-week transition phase (with biweekly dietary classes)
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in mg/cm3 during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan; Trabecular Bone Score is a measure of bone architecture that has been shown to be an independent risk factor for fracture. The measure is unitless, and ranges from 1.0-1.6, where an elevated TBS greater than or equal to 1.3 appears to represent strong, fracture-resistant bone architecture, while a low TBS less than or equal to 1.2 reflects weak, fracture-prone bone architecture.
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan; Trabecular Bone Score is a measure of bone architecture that has been shown to be an independent risk factor for fracture. The measure is unitless, and ranges from 1.0-1.6, where an elevated TBS greater than or equal to 1.3 appears to represent strong, fracture-resistant bone architecture, while a low TBS less than or equal to 1.2 reflects weak, fracture-prone bone architecture.
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in g/cm2 during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken during computed tomography (CT) scan
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
Biomarkers of bone turnover measured via blood specimen
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
Biomarkers of bone turnover measured via blood specimen
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measurement taken via urine sample
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in m/s during the 400 meter walk test
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
The SPPB is a measure of balance, walking speed, and ability to stand from a chair. It provides a global measure of overall physical function and is a good predictor of future disability, institutionalization, and mortality in older persons. The SPPB score is calculated by assigning each of the test measures (balance, walking speed, and chair stands) a score from 0 (unable to do) to 4 (best) and then adding these scores together for a total score ranging from 0 to 12. An SPPB score less than 10 identifies persons at higher risk for mobility disability.
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in seconds to assess physical performance; measures the time the participant takes to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured in seconds using the participant's fastest time achieved to climb a 12 step staircase in two trials.
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured using an isokinetic dynamometer with the participant sitting and the hips and knee flexed at 90°. Participants will be asked to extend the knee and push as hard as possible against the resistance pad. Strength is expressed as peak torque (Nm)
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured twice in each hand to the nearest two kg using an isometric Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer with the mean value from the stronger hand used
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) with scores ranging from 0-30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured using the Pittsburgh Fatigability scale, which is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses fatigability, or the rate at which a person experiences mental or physical fatigue in the context of a standardized task. The scale ranges from 0-5, where those who exhibit more fatigability, score of 5, are more likely to limit activities of daily living and to reduce exertion during physical activities.
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
measured using The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instrument is an 8-item short-form that assesses pain and fatigue over the past 7 days. The scale ranges from 1-5, with higher scores indicated the presence of pain and fatigue.
Time frame: 12 months from baseline
The CHAMPS questionnaire is a 40-43-item tool that assesses weekly frequency and duration of a variety of lifestyle physical activities that are appropriate for older adults. The purpose of this questionnaire is to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase lifestyle physical activity among older adults. Physical activities are given a METS score, ranging from 2.0-7.0, where activities with an activities of moderate intensity (METS) score of 3.0 or higher, are considered moderate intensity.
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
measured in Newtons via force-sensing insoles to assess overall limb loading and to determine if participants receive enough loading to prevent bone loss from resistance training and weighted vest use when compared to weight loss alone.
Time frame: 6 months from baseline
overall satisfaction measured by a scale from 1-5 with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Other
Acronym: INVEST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00687115
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05184361
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Cruz Quebrada, Lisbon District, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT07718516
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04364282
Attrition, Body Weight
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details