Sodium Fluoride Toothpaste
DrugVarious fluoride toothpastes containing 1350 ppm F, 1450 ppm F, 1400 ppm F and 250 ppm F
Other names: Fluoride
NCT Number: NCT00708123
This study is to evaluate the effect of fluoride dentifrices on enamel with artificial caries lesions in an in situ model.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–78 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Topical fluorides have been proven to be clinically effective in the prevention of dental caries. It is generally agreed that anti-caries effect of fluoride (F) is mainly by decreasing the rate of enamel demineralization and enhancing the rate of enamel remineralization. An in-situ Surface Micro-hardness (SMH) test is widely used to evaluate enamel demineralization and remineralization during the caries process. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of toothpaste formulations containing fluoride from different sources [sodium fluoride (NaF) and sodium monofluorophosphate (NaMFP)] using an in situ caries model.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Various fluoride toothpastes containing 1350 ppm F, 1450 ppm F, 1400 ppm F and 250 ppm F
Other names: Fluoride
Fluoride free toothpaste (0 ppm F)
Time frame: Baseline to 14 days
%SMHR test was used to assess mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. %SMHR was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. %SMHR was calculated from indentation values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after intra-oral exposure (R) and after in-vitro demineralization (D) using formula: [(D-R)/ (D-B)]*100.
Time frame: Baseline to 14 days
%SMHR test was used to assess mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. %SMHR was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. %SMHR was calculated from indentation values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after intra-oral exposure (R) and after in-vitro demineralization (D) using formula: [(D-R)/ (D-B)]*100.
Time frame: Baseline to 14 days
Enamel fluoride uptake was determined using the microdrill enamel biopsy technique. The amount of fluoride uptake by enamel was calculated based on the amount of fluoride (F) divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as ug F/cm2. The difference between treatments was calculated with respect to fluoride uptake by enamel.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy From the Retention Phase of Fluoride Delivery of Fluoride Toothpastes Using an in Situ Caries Model
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07470125
Healthy Subjects
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT06818032
Healthy, Healthy Adult
Burlington, Vermont, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00761631
Healthy Subjects
Benton, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02610465
Cardiac-Related Conditions, Healthy Subjects
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details