Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
NCT Number: NCT03599726
Safe and independent mobility at home and in the community requires control of walking while accomplishing other functional tasks. A hallmark of healthy control of walking is automaticity, defined as the ability of the nervous system to successfully coordinate movement with minimal use of attention-demanding executive resources [1]. Recent evidence indicates that walking disorders are often characterized by a shift in the locomotor control strategy from healthy automaticity to compensatory executive control. This shift is potentially detrimental to walking performance as an executive control strategy is not optimized for locomotor control and it places excessive demands on a limited pool of cognitive reserve.
Here, the investigators hypothesize that walking automaticity, as measured by the prefrontal cortex activity while walking, will be improved by donepezil (a cholinesterase inhibitor).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–90 year
All sexes
Interventional
Early Phase 1
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
A challenge to studying automaticity is that central nervous system circuitry for locomotion cannot be directly assessed in humans so shifts between automaticity and executive control have been inferred with a dual-task paradigm. If gait slows or deteriorates during a concurrent cognitive task, gait is deemed less automatic and using more cortical control. Recently, a more direct measure of automaticity has been studied with functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). fNIRS is used to measure changes in cortical oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) levels using light-tissue interaction properties of light within the near infrared range, similar to the way the HbO2 is detected with magnetic resonance imaging. Increased oxygenated hemoglobin are related to increased blood flow, which, in turn, reflects increased cortical activity.
A recent study shows higher than normal activation of the prefrontal cortex during usual walking in patients with PD, an indicator of increased cortical control and reduced automaticity. An enhanced understanding of the neurochemistry underlying gait automaticity in PD will have implications for pharmacologic management of gait impairment in PD. If reduced gait automaticity is due to depressed central dopamine, then more aggressive dopaminergic strategies may be in order. On the other hand, if reduced gait automaticity is due to depressed central cholinergic tone (as the investigators hypothesize), then cholinergic strategies will be more effective for optimizing gait in PD. Few studies have explored the positive effects of cholinergic augmentation on gait and falls but none have examined its direct effects on gait automaticity.
Aim I. Examine the effect of donepezil or levodopa on walking automaticity, as measured by prefrontal cortex activity while walking. This study will employ a double-blind, two-way crossover design in which 20 participants with idiopathic PD will be tested either after 14 days of placebo and their regular dose of levodopa or after 14 days of donepezil (5 mg/day oral) and their regular dose of levodopa. Levodopa doses are not determined or controlled by the investigators, as the recruited participants are already on levodopa specific to their own needs. The investigators will measure automaticity by measuring the activity of the prefrontal cortex while walking in single- and dual-task conditions with a wireless fNIRS system. The investigators predict that donepezil plus levodopa will decrease the prefrontal cortex activity, indicating more automaticity, during walking compared to placebo and levodopa.
Aim II. Relate walking automaticity with spatio-temporal measures of walking. In addition to walking automaticity measured with fNIRS while walking, subjects will be equipped with 3 inertial sensors to measure spatio-temporal features of gait, such as stride time, stride length and their variability. The investigators hypothesize that variability of gait will be related to level of prefrontal cortex activity. The investigators predict that variability of gait will not change with levodopa, reflecting prefrontal control of walking. In contrast, the investigators predict that donepezil will improve variability of gait, both with and without a concurrent, cognitive task.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Donepezil 5 mg per day for week 1-2 or 5-6
Other names: Aricept
Placebo 5 mg per day for week 1-2 or 5-6
Time frame: 43 days
Oxygenated hemoglobin changes during walking, compared to standing, will be quantified with a wireless functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Subjects with PD will be tested while walking after 14 days of placebo and their regular dose of levodopa or after 14 days of donepezil (5 mg/day oral) and their regular dose of levodopa, with a two week wash out in between.
Time frame: 43 days
Subjects will be equipped with 3 inertial sensors during walking and turning tasks to measure spatio-temporal features of gait and turning features. The walking will be 2 min long in duration over a path of 9 feet. Stride time variability will be calculated as: mean(stride time)/SD (stride time)*100 of all the gait cycles detected for walking.
Time frame: 43 days
Average gait speed during the walking tasks.
Time frame: 43 days
Average stride length calculated as the mean of all the detected gait cycles.
Time frame: 43 days
Turning will be identified from the yaw angular velocity of the sensor on the waist. Turning velocity is calculated as the peak of the angular velocity during turning.
Time frame: 43 days
Turning will be identified from the yaw angular velocity of the sensor on the waist. Turning duration represents the duration of the turn while walking.
Oregon Health and Science University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06133283
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05766813
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07723027
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Shakargarh, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07361250
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial Details