Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00106080

Improving the Quality of End-of-Life Communication for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a multifaceted intervention to improve the quality of end-of-life communication between patients with COPD and their primary care providers using information about patients preferences for end of life care and how to communicate and use this information to activate patients, family members, and healthcare providers.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Seattle, Washington, 98108, United States

About this study

This project builds on previous work that described preferences important to patients at end-of-life and desire for life-sustaining therapy by incorporating these attributes into a multifaceted intervention designed to improve the quality of end-of-life communication.

Our specific aim was to evaluate a multifaceted intervention to improve the quality of end-of-life communication between patients with moderate or severe COPD and their primary care providers. The intervention is based on self-efficacy theory and includes provider education, local champions and role models, determination of patients individual barriers and facilitators regarding communication about end-of-life care, preferences for communication about end-of-life care and preferences for end-of-life care and using this information to activate patients, family members, and healthcare providers.

For both control and intervention patients we collected the following information which was incorporated into a one-page summary report:

  • Preferences about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and mechanical ventilation
  • Preferences for communication with provider
  • Measure of severity of airflow obstruction
  • Barriers and facilitators to communication
  • Preferences for end-of-life care

The intervention was incorporated into a usual clinic visit. For the upcoming clinic visit, we generated an individualized one-page patient specific feedback form for intervention group patients and providers. Patients and providers in the control group did not receive the form.

The generated one-page feedback form was:

  • Mailed to the patient to share with their surrogate
  • Sent to their provider prior to the clinic visit
  • Provided to the patient prior to their clinic visit

The methods used for this study could be translated into clinic practice and possibly generalized to other chronic life-threatening conditions.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

One or more of the following:

1 Have 3 or more outpatient clinics visits for COPD (ICD-9) in the two years prior to enrollment.

  • Have been hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis (ICD-9) for COPD in the two years prior to enrollment.
  • Active use of inhaled beta-agonist and ipratropium bromide (or equivalent in combination inhalers like Combivent) in the 12 months prior to enrollment.

Plus

  • Have a future visit scheduled in one of the eligible primary care or chest clinics; and
  • Have airflow limitation

Exclusion criteria

  • If they have cognitive dysfunction, language barriers or severe psychiatric disorder that would preclude them from completing the questionnaires. This was assessed initially by the patients provider and by the research assistant during in-person interviews.
  • The provider taking care of their COPD does not participate.
  • Have a new diagnosis of COPD within the last month.

Treatment and study plan

Audit and Feedback

Behavioral

Intervention patients and clinicians received a one-page patient-specific individualized summary, based on questionnaire responses, to stimulate conversations.

Primary outcomes

  1. Effect of Intervention on Quality of Patient Clinician Communication About End-of-Life Care(QOC) Scale

    Time frame: Measured at enrollment and 2 weeks after targeted clinic visit

    The quality of end-of-life communication (QOC) score ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better communication between patients and providers.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of Intervention on Patient Reported Discussions About Treatment Preferences at Their Last Clinic Visit.

    Time frame: Assessed 2 weeks after targeted clinic visit

    We measured the difference between intervention and control group patients reporting having had a discussion with their clinician about treatment preferences at their last clinic visit.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Fed

Registry information

Official study title

Improving the Quality of End-of-Life Communication for Patients With COPD

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Mar 21, 2005
Registry last updated
Oct 11, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.