Koraal
Sittard, L, 6130 PC, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT05857592
In the proposed study, the investigators aim to investigate whether the existing ABAS-3 self-report questionnaire is suitable to be completed meaningfully by individuals who are perceived as having mild intellectual disability (55<IQ<85) based on cognitive impairment. Based on the participants' experiences and researchers' expertise, the investigators develop a 'more inclusive' self-report version. The investigators then look at the extent to which participants indicate that they understand this version better, based on user experiences and limited psychometric research. In doing so, the investigators also compare the outcomes of the self-report and informant-report variant.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sittard, L, 6130 PC, Netherlands
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A self-report questionnaire for assessing level of adaptive functioning
A self-report questionnaire for assessing level of adaptive functioning, adapted to the communication level of the participant
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
Degree to which the qualitative information provided by the participant aligns with the self-reported score on the original version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) questionnaire. Outcomes are 0, scores align, -1, scores are lower than answer would suggest, +1, score is higher than answer would suggest.
Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
Degree to which the qualitative information provided by the participant aligns with the self-reported score on the original version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) questionnaire. Outcomes are 0, scores align, -1, scores are lower than answer would suggest, +1, score is higher than answer would suggest.
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
Level of verbal understanding of questions in the questionnaire - qualitative analysis of answers from cognitive interviews during assessment of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition). Terms and concepts that were misinterpreted, participant utterings of confusion of statements of difficulty
Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
Level of verbal understanding of questions in the questionnaire - qualitative analysis of answers from cognitive interviews during assessment of an adapted version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition). Terms and concepts that were misinterpreted, participant utterings of confusion of statements of difficulty.
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
Level of verbal understanding of the instructions in the questionnaire - original version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition). Number of elements that were correctly identiefied (out of possible 10).
Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
Level of verbal understanding of the instructions in the questionnaire - adapted version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition). Number of elements that were correctly identiefied (out of possible 10).
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
Likert scale rating of the overall difficulty of items of original version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) by participants (from 1. very easy - 5. very difficult)
Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
Likert scale rating of the overall difficulty of items of adapted version of the ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) by participants (from 1. very easy - 5. very difficult)
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
The ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) is an observational scale that measures adaptive behaviour. Both self-report and informant report versions are available. In the context of the current study, a 30-item abbreviated version is used. Composite scores are calculated: a total score and three domain scores (conceptual, social and practical domain). Scores range from 0-90 for the total scale and 0-30 for each domain scale. Higher scores indicate better adaptive functioning.
Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
The ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) is an observational scale that measures adaptive behaviour. Both self-report and informant report versions are available. In the context of the current study, a 30-item abbreviated version is used. Composite scores are calculated: a total score and three domain scores (conceptual, social and practical domain). Scores range from 0-90 for the total scale and 0-30 for each domain scale. Higher scores indicate better adaptive functioning.
The second time participants complete the ABAS (approximately 8 weeks after baseline, T1), an adapted version is used, with language and design adapted to the comprehension level of participants according to the outcomes at baseline (T0).
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
The ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) is an observational scale that measures adaptive behaviour. Both self-report and informant report versions are available. In the context of the current study, a 30-item abbreviated version is used. Composite scores are calculated: a total score and three domain scores (conceptual, social and practical domain). Scores range from 0-90 for the total scale and 0-30 for each domain scale. Higher scores indicate better adaptive functioning.
For the informant-report an adapted version of the original is used; the adaptations for the self-report version are replicated for the informant version.
Time frame: Approximately 8 weeks after baseline (T1)
The ABAS-3 (Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System - Third Edition) is an observational scale that measures adaptive behaviour. Both self-report and informant report versions are available. In the context of the current study, a 30-item abbreviated version is used. Composite scores are calculated: a total score and three domain scores (conceptual, social and practical domain). Scores range from 0-90 for the total scale and 0-30 for each domain scale. Higher scores indicate better adaptive functioning.
For the informant-report an adapted version of the original is used; the adaptations for the self-report version are replicated for the informant version.
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
The SCAF (Screener for Adaptive Functioning) is a screening questionnaire for adaptive functioning for individuals who may have MID or BIF. The SCAF yields a total AF score (min 0 - max 24), with higher scores indicating better adaptive functioning.
Koraal
Other
Adapting Self-report Instruments for People With Intellectual Disability to Improve Cognitive Accessibility - Putting Guidelines to the Test
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05933005
Borderline Intellectual Functioning, Mild Intellectual Disability
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07413016
Mild Intellectual Disability
Troina, EN, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07503262
Mild Intellectual Disability
Troina, EN, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07473479
Mild Intellectual Disability
Troina, Enna, Italy
View Trial Details